| Literature DB >> 28083613 |
Yufeng Yao1, Andrzej Wiśniewski2, Qiangli Ma3, Aneta Kowal4, Irena Porębska4, Konrad Pawełczyk5, Jiankun Yu1, Joanna Dubis6, Natalia Żuk6, Yingfu Li7, Li Shi8, Piotr Kuśnierczyk9.
Abstract
An effective cytotoxic immune response to neoplastic cells requires efficient presentation of antigenic peptides to T lymphocytes by HLA class I (HLA-I) molecules. The HLA-I-bound peptide repertoire depends on antigen-processing machinery molecules. Aminopeptidase residing in endoplasmic reticulum 1 (ERAP1) trims peptides to the optimal length for HLA-I binding. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the ERAP1 gene result in changes in aminopeptidase activity and specificity. This may affect susceptibility to cancer. However, non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has not been studied in this respect. We compared genotype and haplotype frequencies of four coding, nonsynonymous ERAP1 SNPs, rs26653G > C, rs26618T > C, rs30187C > T, and rs27044C > G, in NSCLC occurring in two genetically distant populations, Chinese and Poles. We found associations of all four SNPs with NSCLC in Chinese but not in Poles. The differences in ERAP1-NSCLC associations might be explained by highly significant differences in SNP genotype frequencies between Chinese and Poles (except for rs26618). In accordance with this, the most frequent ERAP1 haplotypes were distributed differently in cases versus controls in Chinese, but not in Poles. Our findings add to the differences between Orientals and Caucasians in genetics of disease susceptibility.Entities:
Keywords: Endoplasmic reticulum aminopeptidase-1; Genetic association; Non-small cell lung carcinoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28083613 PMCID: PMC5334393 DOI: 10.1007/s00005-016-0436-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz) ISSN: 0004-069X Impact factor: 4.291
Comparison of the distribution of four ERAP1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between non-small cell lung cancer patients and healthy control individuals in Chinese and Poles
| SNP | Group | Chinese | Poles | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | GC | CC | GG | GC | CC | ||||
| rs26653 | Patients | 125 (29.8) | 213 (50.7) | 82 (19.5) |
| 172 (54.3) | 120 (37.8) | 25 (7.9) |
|
| [R127P] | Controls | 76 (19.7) | 194 (50.4) | 115 (29.9) | 258 (51.0) | 219 (43.3) | 29 (5.7) | ||
| TT | TC | CC | TT | TC | CC | ||||
| rs26618 | Patients | 189 (45.0) | 195 (46.4) | 36 (8.6) |
| 174 (54.9) | 121 (38.2) | 22 (6.9) |
|
| [I276 M] | Controls | 227 (59.0) | 134 (34.8) | 24 (6.2) | 281 (55.5) | 192 (37.9) | 33 (6.6) | ||
| CC | CT | TT | CC | CT | TT | ||||
| rs30187 | Patients | 137 (32.6) | 203 (48.3) | 80 (19.0) |
| 138 (43.6) | 137 (43.2) | 42 (13.2) |
|
| [K528R] | Controls | 87 (22.6) | 198 (51.4) | 100 (26.0) | 228 (45.0) | 223 (44.1) | 55 (10.9) | ||
| CC | CG | GG | CC | CG | GG | ||||
| rs27044 | Patients | 160 (38.1) | 189 (45.0) | 71 (16.9) |
| 170 (53.6) | 118 (37.2) | 29 (9.2) |
|
| [Q730E] | Controls | 95 (24.7) | 201 (52.2) | 89 (23.1) | 275 (54.3) | 195 (38.6) | 36 (7.1) | ||
Chinese: patients N = 420; controls N = 385. Poles: patients N = 317; controls N = 506
Comparison of the distribution of four ERAP1 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between Chinese and Polish healthy populations
| SNPs | Control groups | Genotypes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GG | GC | CC | |||
| rs26653 | Chinese | 76 (19.7) | 194 (50.4) | 115 (29.9) |
|
| [R127P] | Poles | 258 (51.0) | 219 (43.3) | 29 (5.7) |
|
| TT | TC | CC | |||
| rs26618 | Chinese | 227 (59.0) | 134 (34.8) | 24 (6.2) |
|
| [I276 M] | Poles | 281 (55.5) | 192 (37.9) | 33 (6.6) |
|
| CC | CT | TT | |||
| rs30187 | Chinese | 87 (22.6) | 198 (51.4) | 100 (26.0) |
|
| [K528R] | Poles | 228 (45.0) | 223 (44.1) | 55 (10.9) |
|
| CC | CG | GG | |||
| rs27044 | Chinese | 95 (24.7) | 201 (52.2) | 89 (23.1) |
|
| [Q730E] | Poles | 275 (54.3) | 195 (38.6) | 36 (7.1) |
|
Chinese N = 385; Poles N = 506
Fig. 1LD pattern of the four SNPs genotyped in the ERAP1 gene in Chinese (left) and Poles (right). The plot shows r 2 × 100 value as a pairwise measure of LD. Red shading indicates strong LD