Literature DB >> 28083350

Quantitative Evaluation of the Impact of the Healthy Communities Initiative in Cincinnati.

Soeren Mattke, Hangsheng Liu, Samuel Hirshman, Saw Htay Wah, Sydne Newberry.   

Abstract

Metropolitan Cincinnati residents have traditionally had among the highest health care costs in the United States, yet little evidence exists that residents are getting their money's worth, especially in terms of preventive and primary care. Recently, large employers, health plans, and health care providers in the Cincinnati area joined with community organizations in an effort to improve health care and population health, as well as reduce health care costs by focusing on five priority areas: coordinated primary care, health information exchange, quality improvement, public reporting and consumer engagement, and payment innovations. Spearheaded by General Electric (GE) Cincinnati, the resulting Healthy Communities Initiative in Cincinnati was implemented in 2009. In 2012, GE asked RAND Health Advisory Services to assess progress over the first three years of the initiative. Overall, the findings were largely inconclusive because of a concomitant marketwide shift to high-deductible health policies (which are known to have profound effects on care-seeking behavior) and the early stage of the intervention. However, there were some encouraging signs that better care coordination bears fruit, such as less illness-related work loss and fewer avoidable hospital admissions and readmissions. These early impacts suggest that the initiative may succeed in improving care, lowering cost, and improving health status if given sufficient time.

Year:  2015        PMID: 28083350      PMCID: PMC5158259     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rand Health Q        ISSN: 2162-8254


  4 in total

1.  Commentary on "Penetrating the 'black box': financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services," by Douglas A. Conrad and Jon B. Christianson.

Authors:  Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  How do doctors behave when some (but not all) of their patients are in managed care?

Authors:  Sherry Glied; Joshua Graff Zivin
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Association between participation in a multipayer medical home intervention and changes in quality, utilization, and costs of care.

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Eric C Schneider; Meredith B Rosenthal; Kevin G Volpp; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effects of managed care on the length of time that elderly patients spend with physicians during ambulatory visits: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

Authors:  Peifeng Hu; David B Reuben
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.983

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.