Literature DB >> 28083218

Bibliometrics as a Tool for Supporting Prospective R&D Decision-Making in the Health Sciences: Strengths, Weaknesses and Options for Future Development.

Sharif Ismail, Edward Nason, Sonja Marjanovic, Jonathan Grant.   

Abstract

Bibliometric analysis is an increasingly important part of a broader "toolbox" of evaluation methods available to research and development (R&D) policymakers to support decision-making. In the US, UK and Australia, for example, there is evidence of gradual convergence over the past ten years towards a model of university research assessment and ranking incorporating the use of bibliometric measures. In Britain, the Department of Health (England) has shown growing interest in using bibliometric analysis to support prospective R&D decision-making, and has engaged RAND Europe's expertise in this area through a number of exercises since 2005. These range from the macro-level selection of potentially high impact institutions, to micro-level selection of high impact individuals for the National Institute for Health Research's faculty of researchers. The aim of this study is to create an accessible, "beginner's guide" to bibliometric theory and application in the area of health R&D decision-making. The study also aims to identify future directions and possible next steps in this area, based on RAND Europe's work with the Department of Health to date. It is targeted at a range of audiences, and will be of interest to health and biomedical researchers, as well as R&D decision-makers in the UK and elsewhere. The study was completed with funding support from RAND Europe's Health R&D Policy Research Unit with the Department of Health.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 28083218      PMCID: PMC4945260     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rand Health Q        ISSN: 2162-8254


  7 in total

1.  The impact of Cochrane Systematic Reviews: a mixed method evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research.

Authors:  Frances Bunn; Daksha Trivedi; Phil Alderson; Laura Hamilton; Alice Martin; Steve Iliffe
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-27

2.  Macular disease research in the United Kingdom 2011-2014: a bibliometric analysis of outputs, performance and coverage.

Authors:  Pamela Royle; Norman Waugh
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-12-30

3.  Comparative Performance of Adult Social Care Research, 1996-2011: A Bibliometric Assessment.

Authors:  David Campbell; Grégoire Côté; Jonathan Grant; Martin Knapp; Anji Mehta; Molly Morgan Jones
Journal:  Br J Soc Work       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 4.  Older Adults and Digital Society: Scientific Coverage.

Authors:  José Álvarez-García; Amador Durán-Sánchez; María de la Cruz Del Río-Rama; Ronny Correa-Quezada
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Inequalities in COVID-19 inequalities research: Who had the capacity to respond?

Authors:  Joan Benach; Lucinda Cash-Gibson; Diego F Rojas-Gualdrón; Álvaro Padilla-Pozo; Juan Fernández-Gracia; Víctor M Eguíluz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Tracing ovarian cancer research in Morocco: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Khalid El Bairi; Ouissam Al Jarroudi; Said Afqir
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-05-07

7.  Temporal trend of research related to gun violence from 1981 to 2018 in the United States: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Lung-Chang Chien; Maxim Gakh; Courtney Coughenour; Ro-Ting Lin
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.