| Literature DB >> 28082878 |
María T Ramírez-López1, Rocío Arco2, Juan Decara2, Mariam Vázquez3, Patricia Rivera2, Rosario Noemi Blanco4, Francisco Alén3, Raquel Gómez de Heras4, Juan Suárez5, Fernando Rodríguez de Fonseca3.
Abstract
Maternal malnutrition causes long-lasting alterations in feeding behavior and energy homeostasis in offspring. It is still unknown whether both, the endocannabinoid (eCB) machinery and the lipid metabolism are implicated in long-term adaptive responses to fetal reprogramming caused by maternal undernutrition. We investigated the long-term effects of maternal exposure to a 20% standard diet restriction during preconceptional and gestational periods on the metabolically-relevant tissues hypothalamus, liver, and perirenal fat (PAT) of male and female offspring at adulthood. The adult male offspring from calorie-restricted dams (RC males) exhibited a differential response to the CB1 antagonist AM251 in a chocolate preference test as well as increased body weight, perirenal adiposity, and plasma levels of triglycerides, LDL, VLDL, bilirubin, and leptin. The gene expression of the cannabinoid receptors Cnr1 and Cnr2 was increased in RC male hypothalamus, but a down-expression of most eCBs-metabolizing enzymes (Faah, Daglα, Daglβ, Mgll) and several key regulators of fatty-acid β-oxidation (Cpt1b, Acox1), mitochondrial respiration (Cox4i1), and lipid flux (Pparγ) was found in their PAT. The female offspring from calorie-restricted dams exhibited higher plasma levels of LDL and glucose as well as a reduction in chocolate and caloric intake at post-weaning periods in the feeding tests. Their liver showed a decreased gene expression of Cnr1, Pparα, Pparγ, the eCBs-degrading enzymes Faah and Mgll, the de novo lipogenic enzymes Acaca and Fasn, and the liver-specific cholesterol biosynthesis regulators Insig1 and Hmgcr. Our results suggest that the long-lasting adaptive responses to maternal caloric restriction affected cannabinoid-regulated mechanisms involved in feeding behavior, adipose β-oxidation, and hepatic lipid and cholesterol biosynthesis in a sex-dependent manner.Entities:
Keywords: CB1 receptor; adipose tissue; hypothalamus; lipogenesis; lipoproteins; liver; maternal diet; β-oxidation
Year: 2016 PMID: 28082878 PMCID: PMC5187359 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Behav Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5153 Impact factor: 3.558
Figure 1Experimental design. Two weeks before mating female rats were exposed to 20% caloric restriction up to the gestational day 20 (GD20). Body weight and caloric intake of offspring were monitored from birth (PND0) to adulthood (postnatal weeks 21–23). Feeding behavior (compulsive feeding and feeding response to AM251) was evaluated at adolescence (postnatal weeks 8–9) and adulthood (postnatal weeks 12–13).
Figure 2Body weight (g) and caloric intake (kcal/kg) in dams (A) and their offspring (B–D) in gestation, lactation and/or postweaning periods. Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. (A) Student's t-test. */***P < 0.05/0.001 vs. control dams. (B–D) Bonferrroni post-hoc test: */**P < 0.05/0.01 for CC vs. RC males; #P < 0.05 for CC vs. RC females; &/&&/&&&P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 for CC males vs. females;$/$$/$$$P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 for RC males vs. females.
Figure 3Compulsive feeding (A–D) and feeding response to AM25 (E–H) for chocolate preference (%) and caloric intake (kcal/kg) in offspring in adolescence and/or adulthood. Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Bonferrroni post-hoc test: */**P < 0.05/0.01 vs. respective vehicle males; #/##P < 0.05 for CC vs. RC (vehicle) females; &/&&/&&&P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 for CC males vs. females;$/$$/$$$P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 for RC males vs. females;§P < 0.05 vs. AM251-treated CC females.
Plasma levels of leptin, metabolites, alkaline phosphatase, and hepatic transaminases in adult rat offspring at postnatal weeks 21–23.
| Leptin (ng/mL) | 5.82 ± 0.88 | 12.06 ± 2.13 | 6.07 ± 2.17 | 5.97 ± 1.36 | ns | ns | ns |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 187.33 ± 12.11 | 207.71 ± 19.27 | 169.60 ± 15.65 | 216.00 ± 10.86 | ns | ns | |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 79.50 ± 3.12 | 114.13 ± 9.66 | 82.60 ± 15.96 | 96.50 ± 11.64 | ns | ns | |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 39.00 ± 5.49 | 44.86 ± 2.13 | 37.20 ± 2.53 | 31.13 ± 2.56 | ns | Ns | |
| HDL (mg/dL) | 26.67 ± 3.04 | 4.43 ± 0.81 | 21.60 ± 2.91 | 2.12 ± 0.55 | ns | ||
| LDL (mg/dL) | 12.37 ± 2.79 | 55.67 ± 3.5 | 17.09 ± 8.37 | 37.01 ± 7.55 | ns | Ns | |
| VLDL (mg/dL) | 15.90 ± 0.62 | 22.863 ± 1.93 | 16.52 ± 3.19 | 19.30 ± 2.33 | ns | Ns | |
| Urea (mg/dL) | 27.50 ± 2.89 | 31.25 ± 1.66 | 30.40 ± 2.02 | 34.75 ± 2.07 | ns | ns | |
| Bilirubin (mg/dL) | 0.13 ± 0.02 | 0.30 ± 0.07 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | ns | ns | |
| ALKP (UI) | 73.13 ± 3.39 | 72.14 ± 3.48 | 63.20 ± 7.79 | 65.43 ± 2.30 | ns | ns | |
| γGT (UI) | 10.50 ± 1.01 | 10.86 ± 0.34 | 12.20 ± 0.96 | 11.50 ± 0.93 | ns | ns | Ns |
| AST (UI) | 162.50 ± 33.02 | 138.14 ± 18.33 | 145.00 ± 20.39 | 133.14 ± 1.21 | ns | ns | Ns |
| ALT (UI) | 55.00 ± 3.96 | 69.86 ± 6.82 | 70.40 ± 8.37 | 56.63 ± 7.27 | ns | Ns | |
| AST/ALT | 0.39 ± 0.06 | 0.52 ± 0.03 | 4.05 ± 0.24 | 4.84 ± 0.25 | ns | ns | |
CC, offspring from control-fed dams; RC, offspring from calorie-restricted dams. Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferrroni post-hoc test:
P < 0.05/0.001 vs. CC males;
P < 0.05/0.001 vs. CC females;
P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 vs. RC males; ns, non-significant.
Levels of adiposity in perirenal, perigonadal and abdominal fat of rat adult offspring at postnatal weeks 21–23.
| Perirenal fat (g) | 8.90 ± 0.41 | 12.30 ± 0.64 | 4.82 ± 0.36 | 5.73 ± 0.69 | |||
| Perirenal fat/BW (%) | 1.97 ± 0.08 | 2.47 ± 0.12 | 1.80 ± 0.12 | 2.06 ± 0.19 | ns | ns | |
| Perigonadal fat (g) | 9.32 ± 0.61 | 11.32 ± 0.70 | 6.14 ± 0.67 | 7.2 ± 0.49 | ns | ||
| Perigonadal fat/BW (%) | 2.06 ± 0.12 | 2.27 ± 0.13 | 2.29 ± 0.21 | 2.66 ± 0.14 | ns | Ns | |
| Abdominal fat (g) | 18.22 ± 0.94 | 23.63 ± 1.14 | 10.96 ± 0.96 | 12.95 ± 1.11 | ns | ||
| Abdominal fat/BW (%) | 4.03 ± 0.18 | 4.74 ± 0.20 | 4.15 ± 0.28 | 4.72 ± 0.30 | ns | ns | |
CC, offspring from control-fed dams; RC, offspring from calorie-restricted dams. Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferrroni post-hoc test:
P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 vs. CC males;
P < 0.05/0.001 vs. RC males; ns, non-significant.
Figure 4Effect of prenatal caloric restriction on the gene expression of components of the endocannabinoid system (, liver (B), and perirenal adipose tissue (PAT, C) of male and female offspring at adulthood. Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Bonferrroni post-hoc test: */**/***P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 vs. CC males; #/##/###P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 vs. CC females; $P < 0.05 vs. RC males.
Figure 5Effect of prenatal caloric restriction on the gene expression of enzymes and regulators of the lipogenesis ( and/or perirenal adipose tissue (PAT) (C,D) of male and female offspring at adulthood. Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Bonferrroni post-hoc test: */**/***P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 vs. CC males; #/##/###P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 vs. CC females.
Figure 6Effect of prenatal caloric restriction on the gene expression of the lipid flux and storage regulators and perirenal adipose tissue (PAT) (B) of male and female offspring at adulthood. Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Bonferrroni post-hoc test: */***P < 0.05/0.01/0.001 vs. CC males; #P < 0.05 vs. CC females; $$P < 0.01 vs. RC males.