Literature DB >> 28082611

Protecting Patients from their Bad Decisions: Rebalancing Rights, Relationships, and Risk.

Emma Cave1.   

Abstract

Patients have a right to autonomy that encompasses making medical decisions that others consider 'bad'. The ambits of this right in law and clinical practice are explored in this article, which describes an expansion of welfare protections across different aspects of medical law and explores their justifications and implications. In England and Wales, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 sets out protections for those who fall within its definition of incapacity. Those who retain capacity are ostensibly free to make decisions others consider unwise. But the decisions of those with borderline capacity; those whose decisions conflict with the public interest in protecting the patient from harm; and those considered 'vulnerable' are, in circumstances explored in this article, susceptible to override. The article explores the effects of these developments on the relationship between patients' autonomy rights and clinicians' responsibilities.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press; all rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; capacity; consent; necessity; paternalism; vulnerability

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28082611      PMCID: PMC5907906          DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fww046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Law Rev        ISSN: 0967-0742            Impact factor:   1.267


  1 in total

1.  The debate regarding maintenance treatment with antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Michael Davidson
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 5.986

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.