Julien Boetto1,2, Franck Bielle2,3,4,5, Marc Sanson2,4,6, Matthieu Peyre2,4,7, Michel Kalamarides2,4,7. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier University Medical Center, Montpellier, France. 2. INSERM U1127, Paris, France. 3. Department of Neuropathology, APHP, Hôpital de La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. 4. Sorbonne Universités, UPMC, Paris, France. 5. OncoNeuroTek, Paris, France. 6. Department of Neurology, APHP, Hôpital de La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, APHP, Hôpital de La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Abstract
Background: Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors in adults. Identification of SMO and AKT1 mutations in meningiomas has raised the hope for targeted therapies. It would be useful to know the precise frequency of these mutations in anatomical subgroups and clarify their prognostic value. Methods: We used the Sanger sequencing technique to characterize 79 samples of olfactory groove meningiomas for SMO (L412F and W535L) and AKT1E17K mutations. We reviewed clinical data to assess the prognostic value of these mutations in this anatomical subgroup. Results: Out of the 79 patients with olfactory groove meningiomas, we identified targetable mutations in 34 patients (43%) (22 patients [28%] with SMO mutation-L412F almost exclusively-and 12 patients [15%] with AKT1 mutation). Meningiomas in the SMO-mutant group had an overall 36% recurrence rate, significantly higher than in the AKT1-mutant group (16%) and in the "SMO and AKT1 wildtype" group (11%) (χ2 test, P = .04). All late recurrences (after 5 y) occurred in the SMO-mutant group. Among grade I meningiomas, the SMO-mutant group was identified as having a significantly poorer prognosis. World Health Organization histological grade II (P = .006) and incomplete resection (P = .001) were independently associated with shorter recurrence-free survival. Conclusion: Molecular diagnosis of SMOL412F/W535L and AKT1E17K mutations improves prognostic evaluation in olfactory groove meningiomas and opens new therapeutic perspectives with SMO or AKT inhibitors for recurrent cases.
Background: Meningiomas are the most common primary intracranial tumors in adults. Identification of SMO and AKT1 mutations in meningiomas has raised the hope for targeted therapies. It would be useful to know the precise frequency of these mutations in anatomical subgroups and clarify their prognostic value. Methods: We used the Sanger sequencing technique to characterize 79 samples of olfactory groove meningiomas for SMO (L412F and W535L) and AKT1E17K mutations. We reviewed clinical data to assess the prognostic value of these mutations in this anatomical subgroup. Results: Out of the 79 patients with olfactory groove meningiomas, we identified targetable mutations in 34 patients (43%) (22 patients [28%] with SMO mutation-L412F almost exclusively-and 12 patients [15%] with AKT1 mutation). Meningiomas in the SMO-mutant group had an overall 36% recurrence rate, significantly higher than in the AKT1-mutant group (16%) and in the "SMO and AKT1 wildtype" group (11%) (χ2 test, P = .04). All late recurrences (after 5 y) occurred in the SMO-mutant group. Among grade I meningiomas, the SMO-mutant group was identified as having a significantly poorer prognosis. World Health Organization histological grade II (P = .006) and incomplete resection (P = .001) were independently associated with shorter recurrence-free survival. Conclusion: Molecular diagnosis of SMOL412F/W535L and AKT1E17K mutations improves prognostic evaluation in olfactory groove meningiomas and opens new therapeutic perspectives with SMO or AKT inhibitors for recurrent cases.
Authors: J Kros; K de Greve; A van Tilborg; W Hop; H Pieterman; C Avezaat; R Lekanne Dit Deprez; E Zwarthoff Journal: J Pathol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Thomas Kaley; Igor Barani; Marc Chamberlain; Michael McDermott; Katherine Panageas; Jeffrey Raizer; Leland Rogers; David Schiff; Michael Vogelbaum; Damien Weber; Patrick Wen Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Guilherme M Xavier; Maisa Seppala; William Barrell; Anahid A Birjandi; Finn Geoghegan; Martyn T Cobourne Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: M H Ruttledge; J Sarrazin; S Rangaratnam; C M Phelan; E Twist; P Merel; O Delattre; G Thomas; M Nordenskjöld; V P Collins Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1994-02 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Richard G Everson; Yuuri Hashimoto; Jacob L Freeman; Tiffany R Hodges; Jason Huse; Shouhao Zhou; Joanne Xiu; David Spetzler; Nader Sanai; Lyndon Kim; Santosh Kesari; Andrew Brenner; Franco De Monte; Amy Heimberger; Shaan M Raza Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mark W Youngblood; Danielle F Miyagishima; Lan Jin; Trisha Gupte; Chang Li; Daniel Duran; Julio D Montejo; Amy Zhao; Amar Sheth; Evgeniya Tyrtova; Koray Özduman; Francesco Iacoangeli; Matthieu Peyre; Julien Boetto; Matthew Pease; Timuçin Avşar; Anita Huttner; Kaya Bilguvar; Türker Kilic; M Necmettin Pamir; Nduka Amankulor; Michel Kalamarides; E Zeynep Erson-Omay; Murat Günel; Jennifer Moliterno Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 12.300