Literature DB >> 28082333

The cerebrovascular response to lower-body negative pressure vs. head-up tilt.

Anne-Sophie G T Bronzwaer1,2, Jasper Verbree3, Wim J Stok2,4, Mat J A P Daemen5, Mark A van Buchem3, Matthias J P van Osch3, Johannes J van Lieshout6,2,4,7.   

Abstract

Lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) has been proposed as a MRI-compatible surrogate for orthostatic stress. Although the effects of LBNP on cerebral hemodynamic behavior have been considered to reflect those of orthostatic stress, a direct comparison with actual orthostasis is lacking. We assessed the effects of LBNP (-50 mmHg) vs. head-up tilt (HUT; at 70°) in 10 healthy subjects (5 female) on transcranial Doppler-determined cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv) in the middle cerebral artery and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) as estimated from the blood pressure signal (finger plethysmography). CPP was maintained during LBNP but decreased after 2 min in response to HUT, leading to an ~15% difference in CPP between LBNP and HUT (P ≤ 0.020). Mean CBFv initially decreased similarly in response to LBNP and for HUT, but, from minute 3 on, the decline became ~50% smaller (P ≤ 0.029) during LBNP. The reduction in end-tidal Pco2 partial pressure (PetCO2 ) was comparable but with an earlier return toward baseline values in response to LBNP but not during HUT (P = 0.008). We consider the larger decrease in CBFv during HUT vs. LBNP attributable to the pronounced reduction in PetCO2 and to gravitational influences on CPP, and this should be taken into account when applying LBNP as an MRI-compatible orthostatic stress modality.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Lower-body negative pressure (LBNP) has the potential to serve as a MRI-compatible surrogate of orthostatic stress but a comparison with actual orthostasis was lacking. This study showed that the pronounced reduction in end-tidal Pco2 together with gravitational effects on the brain circulation lead to a larger decline in cerebral blood flow velocity in response to head-up tilt than during lower-body negative pressure. This should be taken into account when employing lower-body negative pressure as MRI-compatible alternative to orthostatic stress.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cerebral hemodynamics; gravity; orthostatic stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28082333     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00797.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  10 in total

Review 1.  Systemic and cerebral circulatory adjustment within the first 60 s after active standing: An integrative physiological view.

Authors:  Mark P M Harms; Ciáran Finucane; Laura Pérez-Denia; Stephen P Juraschek; Veera K van Wijnen; Lewis A Lipsitz; Johannes J van Lieshout; Wouter Wieling
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.145

2.  Influence of head-up tile and lower body negative pressure on the internal jugular vein.

Authors:  Shigehiko Ogoh; Ai Hirasawa; Shigeki Shibata
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-05

3.  Lower body negative pressure to safely reduce intracranial pressure.

Authors:  Lonnie G Petersen; Justin S Lawley; Alexander Lilja-Cyron; Johan C G Petersen; Erin J Howden; Satyam Sarma; William K Cornwell; Rong Zhang; Louis A Whitworth; Michael A Williams; Marianne Juhler; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Support Vector Machine Based Monitoring of Cardio-Cerebrovascular Reserve during Simulated Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Björn J P van der Ster; Frank C Bennis; Tammo Delhaas; Berend E Westerhof; Wim J Stok; Johannes J van Lieshout
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Effect of acute hypoxemia on cerebral blood flow velocity control during lower body negative pressure.

Authors:  Noud van Helmond; Blair D Johnson; Walter W Holbein; Humphrey G Petersen-Jones; Ronée E Harvey; Sushant M Ranadive; Jill N Barnes; Timothy B Curry; Victor A Convertino; Michael J Joyner
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-02

Review 6.  Central Hypovolemia Detection During Environmental Stress-A Role for Artificial Intelligence?

Authors:  Björn J P van der Ster; Yu-Sok Kim; Berend E Westerhof; Johannes J van Lieshout
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Cuff-Method Thigh Arterial Occlusion Counteracts Cerebral Hypoperfusion Against the Push-Pull Effect in Humans.

Authors:  Changyang Xing; Yuan Gao; Xinpei Wang; Wenjuan Xing; Yunnan Liu; Yujia Lei; Xing Zhang; Shu Zhang; Lijun Yuan; Feng Gao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Non-linear Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Interaction in Response to Lower-Body Negative Pressure.

Authors:  Ajay K Verma; Da Xu; Amanmeet Garg; Anita T Cote; Nandu Goswami; Andrew P Blaber; Kouhyar Tavakolian
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Acute reduction in posterior cerebral blood flow following isometric handgrip exercise is augmented by lower body negative pressure.

Authors:  Takuro Washio; Jennifer R Vranish; Jasdeep Kaur; Benjamin E Young; Keisho Katayama; Paul J Fadel; Shigehiko Ogoh
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-10

10.  Detecting central hypovolemia in simulated hypovolemic shock by automated feature extraction with principal component analysis.

Authors:  Björn J P van der Ster; Berend E Westerhof; Wim J Stok; Johannes J van Lieshout
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-11
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.