PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Given the policy shifts toward extended work lives, it is critically important to address barriers that older workers may face in attaining and maintaining satisfactory work. This article presents a scoping review of research addressing ageism and its implications for the employment experiences and opportunities of older workers. DESIGN AND METHODS: The five-step scoping review process outlined by Arksey and O'Malley was followed. The data set included 43 research articles. RESULTS: The majority of articles were cross-sectional quantitative surveys, and various types of study participants (older workers, human resource personnel/manager, employers, younger workers, undergraduate students) were included. Four main themes, representing key research emphases, were identified: stereotypes and perceptions of older workers; intended behavior toward older workers; reported behavior toward older workers; and older workers' negotiation of ageism. IMPLICATIONS: Existing research provides a foundational evidence base for the existence of ageist stereotypes and perceptions about older workers and has begun to demonstrate implications in relation to intended behaviors and, to a lesser extent, actual behaviors toward older workers. A few studies have explored how aging workers attempt to negotiate ageism. Further research that extends beyond cross-sectional surveys is required to achieve more complex understandings of the implications of ageism and inform policies and practices that work against ageism.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Given the policy shifts toward extended work lives, it is critically important to address barriers that older workers may face in attaining and maintaining satisfactory work. This article presents a scoping review of research addressing ageism and its implications for the employment experiences and opportunities of older workers. DESIGN AND METHODS: The five-step scoping review process outlined by Arksey and O'Malley was followed. The data set included 43 research articles. RESULTS: The majority of articles were cross-sectional quantitative surveys, and various types of study participants (older workers, human resource personnel/manager, employers, younger workers, undergraduate students) were included. Four main themes, representing key research emphases, were identified: stereotypes and perceptions of older workers; intended behavior toward older workers; reported behavior toward older workers; and older workers' negotiation of ageism. IMPLICATIONS: Existing research provides a foundational evidence base for the existence of ageist stereotypes and perceptions about older workers and has begun to demonstrate implications in relation to intended behaviors and, to a lesser extent, actual behaviors toward older workers. A few studies have explored how aging workers attempt to negotiate ageism. Further research that extends beyond cross-sectional surveys is required to achieve more complex understandings of the implications of ageism and inform policies and practices that work against ageism.
Authors: Jonathan K Fan; Robert A Macpherson; Peter M Smith; M Anne Harris; Monique A M Gignac; Christopher B McLeod Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2021-06
Authors: Martine Lagacé; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Lise Van de Beeck; Caroline D Bergeron; Philippe Rodrigues-Rouleau; Audrey St-Amour Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-16 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Fiona G Kouyoumdjian; Evgeny M Andreev; Rohan Borschmann; Stuart A Kinner; Andres McConnon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-14 Impact factor: 3.240