Literature DB >> 2808216

In-vitro activity of meropenem against clinical isolates obtained in Canada.

A M Clarke1, S J Zemcov.   

Abstract

The in-vitro activity of meropenem, a new parenteral carbapenem, was compared with that of imipenem, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, piperacillin, gentamicin and, where appropriate, other antibiotics against recent clinical isolates and characterized beta-lactamase producers. MICs were determined by a standard agar dilution procedure and two inocula (10(4) and 10(6) cfu) were used throughout. Meropenem inhibited 90% of isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, indole-positive Proteus spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia marcescens and Providencia stuartii at less than or equal to 0.25 mg/l and was four- to 16-fold more active than imipenem against these species. Against the enteric pathogens Salmonella typhi, Shigella sonnei, Yersinia enterocolitica and Campylobacter jejuni, meropenem was four- to eight-fold more active than imipenem, inhibiting all isolates at less than or equal to 0.03 mg/l. Meropenem was also more active than imipenem against Haemophilus influenzae (MIC90 0.06 mg/l) but had similar activity against the Bacteroides fragilis group (MIC90 0.25 mg/l), against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC90 2 mg/l) and against streptococci. Imipenem was four-fold more active than meropenem against Acinetobacter spp. and two- to eight-fold more active against all species of staphylococci tested. Both meropenem and imipenem were inactive against Ps. (Xanthomonas) maltophilia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808216     DOI: 10.1093/jac/24.suppl_a.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  6 in total

1.  Imipenem and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects.

Authors:  G G Zhanel; A E Simor; L Vercaigne; L Mandell
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07

2.  Distribution of cphA or related carbapenemase-encoding genes and production of carbapenemase activity in members of the genus Aeromonas.

Authors:  G M Rossolini; A Zanchi; A Chiesurin; G Amicosante; G Satta; P Guglielmetti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutics for Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2.

Authors:  Polina A Egorova; Ilya B Bezprozvanny
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Comparative in vitro activity of biapenem, a new carbapenem antibiotic.

Authors:  A M Clarke; S J Zemcov
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Future directions in antimicrobial chemotherapy.

Authors:  R Janknegt
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-08-21

Review 6.  Meropenem. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; A J Wagstaff; R N Brogden; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.