Literature DB >> 28082154

Lead Aprons Are a Lead Exposure Hazard.

Kevin M Burns1, Jamie M Shoag2, Sukhraj S Kahlon3, Patrick J Parsons4, Polly E Bijur5, Benjamin H Taragin6, Morri Markowitz7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether lead-containing shields have lead dust on the external surface.
METHODS: Institutional review board approval was obtained for this descriptive study of a convenience sample of 172 shields. Each shield was tested for external lead dust via a qualitative rapid on-site test and a laboratory-based quantitative dust wipe analysis, flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). The χ2 test was used to test the association with age, type of shield, lead sheet thickness, storage method, and visual and radiographic appearance.
RESULTS: Sixty-three percent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56%-70%) of the shields had detectable surface lead by FAAS and 50% (95% CI: 43%-57%) by the qualitative method. Lead dust by FAAS ranged from undetectable to 998 μg/ft2. The quantitative detection of lead was significantly associated with the following: (1) visual appearance of the shield (1 = best, 3 = worst): 88% of shields that scored 3 had detectable dust lead; (2) type of shield: a greater proportion of the pediatric patient, full-body, and thyroid shields were positive than vests and skirts; (3) use of a hanger for storage: 27% of shields on a hanger were positive versus 67% not on hangers. Radiographic determination of shield intactness, thickness of interior lead sheets, and age of shield were unrelated to presence of surface dust lead.
CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-three percent of shields had detectable surface lead that was associated with visual appearance, type of shield, and storage method. Lead-containing shields are a newly identified, potentially widespread source of lead exposure in the health industry.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Occupational safety; patient safety; radiation protection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28082154     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  3 in total

1.  Quality Assurance of Personal Radiation Shield for Kilovoltage Photon: A Multicentre Experience.

Authors:  Omemh Bawazeer
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-03-24

2.  Increased lead concentrations in the hairs of radiographers in general hospitals.

Authors:  Mao-Chin Hung; Peter Chang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Evaluating the X-ray-Shielding Performance of Graphene-Oxide-Coated Nanocomposite Fabric.

Authors:  Serhat Süha Türkaslan; Şule Sultan Ugur; Banu Esencan Türkaslan; Nicholas Fantuzzi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.623

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.