Literature DB >> 28082115

Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study.

Giovanni D De Palma1, Mariano C Giglio1, Dario Bruzzese2, Nicola Gennarelli1, Francesco Maione1, Saverio Siciliano1, Benedetta Manzo1, Gianluca Cassese1, Gaetano Luglio1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EndoCuff is a disposable device applied to standard colonoscopes to improve mucosal visualization. Randomized parallel trials have shown that EndoCuff increases the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The primary aim of this study was to compare the ADR between EndoCuff-assisted colonoscopies (EAC) and standard colonoscopies within a randomized back-to-back trial.
METHODS: This was a single-center randomized crossover study (NCT02374515) involving adult patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Participants received back-to-back standard colonoscopies and EACs in a random order, performed by the same endoscopist. All polyps were excised, but only those proven at histology to be adenomas were considered for analysis.
RESULTS: From February 2015 to March 2016, a total of 288 patients were enrolled, and 274 were included in the per-protocol analysis. Compared with standard colonoscopies, EACs increased the ADR (29.6% vs 26.3%; P < .01) and the number of diagnosed adenomas (176 vs 129; P < .01), particularly in the left (73 vs 46; P < .01) and right sides of the colon (83 vs 63; P < .01). EAC increased the detection of adenomas <5 mm (129 vs 84; P < .01), but no difference was found with regard to larger lesions. In 7.3% of patients, findings of EndoCuff shortened the surveillance interval determined by standard colonoscopy findings. EndoCuff caused 7 mucosal erosions (2.5% of patients), requiring a mucosal adrenaline injection in 1 case.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of EndoCuff increases the number of identified adenomas, primarily small adenomas in the left and right sides of the colon. This increases the ADR and allows a better definition of the surveillance program. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02374515.).
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28082115     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  19 in total

1.  Editorial: Cuff- and cap-assisted colonoscopy: More questions than answers.

Authors:  Marcus Hollenbach; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 2.  The Role of Behind Folds Visualizing Techniques and Technologies in Improving Adenoma Detection Rate.

Authors:  K E van Keulen; E Soons; P D Siersema
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Endocuff-assisted versus standard colonoscopy for improving adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  J Wang; C Ye; S Fei
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.699

4.  Linked color imaging improves the visibility of various featured colorectal polyps in an endoscopist's visibility and color difference value.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Yuji Naito; Ritsu Yasuda; Takaaki Murakami; Ryohei Hirose; Kiyoshi Ogiso; Yutaka Inada; Osamu Dohi; Kazuhiro Kamada; Kazuhiko Uchiyama; Osamu Handa; Hideyuki Konishi; Rafiz Abdul Rani; Mitsuo Kishimoto; Eiichi Konishi; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  New device to implement the adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Maddalena Zippi; Wandong Hong; Pietro Crispino; Giampiero Traversa
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 6.  New endoscopes and add-on devices to improve colonoscopy performance.

Authors:  Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Is there a difference in adenoma detection rates between gastroenterologists and surgeons?

Authors:  Adele Hwee Hong Lee; Nuttaradee Lojanapiwat; Vikram Balakrishnan; Raaj Chandra
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2018-06-16

Review 8.  Colonoscopy attachments for the detection of precancerous lesions during colonoscopy: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; Eleftherios Spartalis; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Can technology increase adenoma detection rate?

Authors:  Wee Sing Ngu; Colin Rees
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.409

10.  Efficacy of Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Yoshiki Wada; Masayoshi Fukuda; Kazuo Ohtsuka; Mamoru Watanabe; Yumiko Fukuma; Yoko Wada; Masahiro Wada
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.