Literature DB >> 2808205

Comparative in-vitro activity of meropenem against clinical isolates including Enterobacteriaceae with expanded-spectrum beta-lactamases.

C Chanal1, D Sirot, M Chanal, M Cluzel, J Sirot, R Cluzel.   

Abstract

Meropenem, a new parenteral carbapenem, was tested in vitro by an agar-dilution method against 373 standard strains (aerobes and anaerobes) and against nine expanded-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing strains and their transconjugants (5 CTX-1, 2 CAZ-1, 2 CAZ-2). Meropenem was compared with methicillin, imipenem, piperacillin, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, gentamicin, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin and metronidazole. Meropenem and imipenem exhibited an extended spectrum of activity, with low MICs. Only methicillin-resistant staphylococci, and Pseudomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia were resistant. Of the carbapenems, imipenem was more active against methicillin-susceptible staphylococci, streptococci and Enterococcus faecalis, but meropenem was markedly more active against all the Enterobacteriaceae and some pseudomonads. Both had similar activity against Ps. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp. and anaerobes. The carbapenem MICs were very low for Enterol acteriaceae producing the expanded-spectrum beta-lactamases. Against CTX-1-producing strains resistant to cefotaxime and ceftazidime and against CAZ-1 or CAZ-2-producers highly resistant to ceftazidime meropenem was the most active, with MICs lower (0.03-0.12 mg/l) than those of imipenem (0.06-0.5 mg/l), for wild type producers and their transconjugants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808205     DOI: 10.1093/jac/24.suppl_a.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  7 in total

1.  Roles of beta-lactamases and porins in activities of carbapenems and cephalosporins against Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  L Martínez-Martínez; A Pascual; S Hernández-Allés; D Alvarez-Díaz; A I Suárez; J Tran; V J Benedí; G A Jacoby
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Imipenem and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects.

Authors:  G G Zhanel; A E Simor; L Vercaigne; L Mandell
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07

Review 3.  Meropenem clinical pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J W Mouton; J N van den Anker
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Future directions in antimicrobial chemotherapy.

Authors:  R Janknegt
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-08-21

Review 5.  Meropenem. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; A J Wagstaff; R N Brogden; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Activity of meropenem against imipenem-resistant bacteria and selection in vitro of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  L J Piddock; H L Turner
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Combination effect of meropenem with aminoglycosides and teicoplanin on Pseudomonas and enterococci.

Authors:  A Kropec; S Lemmen; M Wursthorn; F D Daschner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.553

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.