Literature DB >> 2808202

Activity of meropenem, against gram-positive bacteria.

F H Kayser1, G Morenzoni, A Strässle, K Hadorn.   

Abstract

A new carbapenem antibiotic, meropenem, was shown to be active against a large number of Gram-positive bacteria. The drug inhibited penicillinase-positive and -negative, methicillin-susceptible staphylococci equally well. Among the comparative antimicrobials examined, only N-formimidoyl-thienamycin (imipenem) was two to four times more active than meropenem. Compared with vancomycin or methicillin, meropenem was 10-20 times more active. Strains of 11 species of streptococci were highly susceptible to meropenem; the geometric mean MICs of the drug for these species ranged from 0.01 to 0.04 mg/l. The agent, however, only had moderate activity against Enterococcus faecalis (mean MIC 5 mg/l) and Ent. faecium (mean MIC 11.6 mg/l). Among Corynebacterium jeikeium, strains were encountered that showed susceptibility to meropenem but resistance to imipenem and other beta-lactams. Strains of other corynebacteria, Rhodococcus equi, Erysopelothrix rhusiopathiae, Listeria monocytogenes, and Bacillus spp. all were highly susceptible to meropenem (mean MICs 0.04-0.17 mg/l). Although methicillin-resistant staphylococci were inhibited by concentrations of 1-2 mg/l of meropenem in agar dilution tests, such strains showed heteroresistance in population studies, as is typical for all beta-lactam antibiotics. In addition, the biochemical correlate of methicillin-resistance, penicillin-binding protein 2', showed low affinity for meropenem, similar to that for imipenem. Meropenem was as bactericidal as imipenem and comparative bactericidal antimicrobials in killing-curve experiments. Strains of Ent. faecium, C. jeikeium, and L. monocytogenes were killed at a slower rate than streptococci or staphylococci.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2808202     DOI: 10.1093/jac/24.suppl_a.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  6 in total

1.  Imipenem and meropenem: Comparison of in vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials and adverse effects.

Authors:  G G Zhanel; A E Simor; L Vercaigne; L Mandell
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07

2.  Serum bactericidal activities and comparative pharmacokinetics of meropenem and imipenem-cilastatin.

Authors:  M Dreetz; J Hamacher; J Eller; K Borner; P Koeppe; T Schaberg; H Lode
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Heteroresistance to meropenem in carbapenem-susceptible Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Alexandros Ikonomidis; Evangelia Neou; Vassiliki Gogou; Georgia Vrioni; Athanassios Tsakris; Spyros Pournaras
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Pharmacokinetics of meropenem compared to imipenem-cilastatin in young, healthy males.

Authors:  I Nilsson-Ehle; M Hutchison; S J Haworth; S R Norrby
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Meropenem. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; A J Wagstaff; R N Brogden; H M Bryson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  The Chemical Relationship Among Beta-Lactam Antibiotics and Potential Impacts on Reactivity and Decomposition.

Authors:  Jonathan Turner; Alyssa Muraoka; Michael Bedenbaugh; Blaine Childress; Lauren Pernot; Mark Wiencek; Yuri K Peterson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.