Literature DB >> 28080181

Conceptualizing patient empowerment in cancer follow-up by combining theory and qualitative data.

Anna Thit Johnsen1,2, Nanna Bjerg Eskildsen1, Thora Grothe Thomsen3,4, Mogens Grønvold2,5, Lone Ross2, Clara R Jørgensen6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient empowerment (PE) may be defined as the opportunity for patients to master issues important to their own health. The aim of this study was to conceptualize PE and how the concept manifests itself for cancer patients attending follow-up, in order to develop a relevant and sensitive questionnaire for this population.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A theoretical model of PE was made, based on Zimmerman's theory of psychological empowerment. Patients who were in follow-up after first line treatment for their cancer (n = 16) were interviewed about their experiences with follow-up. A deductive thematic analysis was conducted to contextualize the theory and find concrete manifestations of empowerment. Data were analyzed to find situations that expressed empowerment or lack of empowerment. We then analyzed what abilities these situations called for and we further analyzed how these abilities fitted Zimmerman's theory.
RESULTS: In all, 16 patients from two different hospitals participated in the interviews. PE in cancer follow-up was conceptualized as: (1) the perception that one had the possibility of mastering treatment and care (e.g. the possibility of 'saying no' to treatment and getting in contact with health care when needed); (2) having knowledge and skills regarding, for example treatment, care, plan of treatment and care, normal reactions and late effects, although knowledge and information was not always considered positively; and (3) being able to make the health care system address one's concerns and needs and, for some patients, also being able to monitor one's treatment, tests and care.
CONCLUSION: We conceptualized PE based on Zimmerman's theory and empirical data to contextualize the concept in cancer follow-up. When developing a patient reported outcome measure measuring PE for this group of patients, one needs to be attentive to differences in wishes regarding mastery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28080181     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  4 in total

1.  The impact of using peer interviewers in a study of patient empowerment amongst people in cancer follow-up.

Authors:  Clara R Jørgensen; Nanna B Eskildsen; Thora G Thomsen; Inger D Nielsen; Anna T Johnsen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  User involvement in a Danish project on the empowerment of cancer patients - experiences and early recommendations for further practice.

Authors:  Clara R Jørgensen; Nanna B Eskildsen; Anna T Johnsen
Journal:  Res Involv Engagem       Date:  2018-08-13

3.  Adverse events of targeted therapies reported by patients with cancer treated in primary care.

Authors:  Samuel Roger; Julien Edeline; Boris Campillo-Gimenez; Elodie Ventroux; Marie-Eve Rouge-Bugat; Anthony Chapron
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Defining an enabling environment for those with chronic disease: an integrative review.

Authors:  Valérie Loizeau; Jean-Manuel Morvillers; Dominique Pougheon Bertrand; Kelley Kilpatrick; Monique Rothan-Tondeur
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2021-12-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.