Literature DB >> 28080157

Detection of recurrence in early stage endometrial cancer - the role of symptoms and routine follow-up.

Mette Moustgaard Jeppesen1, Ole Mogensen2, Dorte Gilså Hansen3, Maria Iachina4, Malene Korsholm1, Pernille Tine Jensen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Considerable controversy remains as to the optimal organization of endometrial cancer follow-up. AIM: To evaluate the relationship between the way recurrence was detected and survival after treatment for endometrial cancer. Further, to identify characteristics associated with a pre-scheduled examination in women with symptomatic recurrence.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: All women with early stage endometrial cancer during 2005-2009 were included in a population-based historical cohort derived from the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database. Women diagnosed with recurrence within three years after primary surgery and the mode of recurrence detection were identified from hospital charts: asymptomatic recurrence detected at regular follow-up, symptomatic recurrence detected at regular follow-up or symptomatic recurrence detected in between follow-up. Survival of women with symptomatic and asymptomatic disease was compared. Furthermore, characteristics associated with self-referral as compared to presenting symptoms at regular follow-ups were identified using univariate analyses.
RESULTS: In total, 183 cases of recurrence (7%) were identified in the cohort of 2612 women. Of these, 65.5% were symptomatic with vaginal bleeding as the most prevalent symptom. Asymptomatic women had a significantly better three-year survival rate compared to symptomatic women (80.3% vs. 54.3%, p < 0.01). A total of 2.3% of the entire population had an asymptomatic recurrence. Women diagnosed at a pre-scheduled visit due to symptoms had a higher educational level (p = 0.03) and more often high-risk disease (p = 0.02) than symptomatic women diagnosed at regular follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Early stage endometrial cancer carries a low risk of recurrence. Survival appears to be superior in asymptomatic patients, but length-time bias, i.e. the effect of aggressive tumor biology in symptomatic recurrences, may bias results in non-randomized controlled trials. Well educated patients with symptoms of recurrence more often sought medical attendance compared to less educated counterparts. This should be considered if patient-initiated follow-up is the standard care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28080157     DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1267396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  6 in total

1.  Factors associated with survival after relapse in patients with low-risk endometrial cancer treated with surgery alone.

Authors:  Nazli Topfedaisi Ozkan; Mehmet Mutlu Meydanlı; Mustafa Erkan Sarı; Fuat Demirkiran; Ilker Kahramanoglu; Tugan Bese; Macit Arvas; Hanifi Şahin; Ali Haberal; Husnu Celik; Gonca Coban; Tufan Oge; Omer Tarik Yalcin; Özgür Akbayır; Baki Erdem; Ceyhun Numanoğlu; Nejat Özgül; Gökhan Boyraz; Mehmet Coşkun Salman; Kunter Yüce; Murat Dede; Mufit Cemal Yenen; Salih Taşkın; Duygu Altın; Uğur Fırat Ortaç; Hülya Aydın Ayık; Tayup Şimşek; Tayfun Güngör; Kemal Güngördük; Muzaffer Sancı; Ali Ayhan
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.401

2.  ATX‑LPA axis facilitates estrogen‑induced endometrial cancer cell proliferation via MAPK/ERK signaling pathway.

Authors:  Guo Zhang; Yuan Cheng; Qi Zhang; Xiaoping Li; Jingwei Zhou; Jianliu Wang; Lihui Wei
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.952

3.  Cost-Consequence Analysis Alongside a Randomised Controlled Trial of Hospital Versus Telephone Follow-Up after Treatment for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Padraig Dixon; Kinta Beaver; Susan Williamson; Chris Sutton; Pierre Martin-Hirsch; William Hollingworth
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.561

4.  Healthcare utilisation in general practice and hospitals in the year preceding a diagnosis of cancer recurrence or second primary cancer: a population-based register study.

Authors:  Linda Aagaard Rasmussen; Henry Jensen; Line Flytkjær Virgilsen; Alina Zalounina Falborg; Henrik Møller; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Sociodemographic, personal, and disease-related determinants of referral to patient-reported outcome-based follow-up of remote outpatients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Liv Marit Valen Schougaard; Annette de Thurah; Jakob Christensen; Kirsten Lomborg; Helle Terkildsen Maindal; Caroline Trillingsgaard Mejdahl; Jesper Medom Vestergaard; Trine Nøhr Winding; Karin Biering; Niels Henrik Hjollund
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Patient-initiated follow-up of early endometrial cancer: a potential to improve post-treatment cardiovascular risk?

Authors:  Racheal Louise Johnson; Cheng Choy
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 2.344

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.