Literature DB >> 28080120

A goal bias in action: The boundaries adults perceive in events align with sites of actor intent.

Dani Levine1, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek1, Amy Pace1, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff2.   

Abstract

We live in a dynamic world comprised of continuous events. Remembering our past and predicting future events, however, requires that we segment these ongoing streams of information in a consistent manner. How is this segmentation achieved? This research examines whether the boundaries adults perceive in events, such as the Olympic figure skating routine used in these studies, align with the beginnings (sources) and endings (goals) of human goal-directed actions. Study 1 showed that a group of experts, given an explicit task with unlimited time to rewatch the event, identified the same subevents as one another, but with greater agreement as to the timing of goals than sources. In Study 2, experts, novices familiarized with the figure skating sequence, and unfamiliarized novices performed an online event segmentation task, marking boundaries as the video progressed in real time. The online boundaries of all groups corresponded with the sources and goals offered by Study 1's experts, with greater alignment of goals than sources. Additionally, expertise, but not mere perceptual familiarity, boosted the alignment of sources and goals. Finally, Study 3, which presented novices with the video played in reverse, indicated, unexpectedly, that even when spatiotemporal cues were disrupted, viewers' perceived event boundaries still aligned with their perception of the actors' intended sources and goals. This research extends the goal bias to event segmentation, and suggests that our spontaneous sensitivity toward goals may allow us to transform even relatively complex and unfamiliar event streams into structured and meaningful representations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28080120     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  8 in total

1.  Does semantic knowledge influence event segmentation and recall of text?

Authors:  Kimberly M Newberry; Heather R Bailey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-08

2.  Influences of domain knowledge on segmentation and memory.

Authors:  Kimberly M Newberry; Daniel P Feller; Heather R Bailey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-01-07

3.  The effects of domain knowledge and event structure on event processing.

Authors:  Daniel P Feller; Christopher A Kurby; Kimberly M Newberry; Stephan Schwan; Joseph P Magliano
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-04-06

4.  Semantic knowledge attenuates age-related differences in event segmentation and episodic memory.

Authors:  Barbara L Pitts; Maverick E Smith; Kimberly M Newberry; Heather R Bailey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-09-22

5.  Differential effects of knowledge and aging on the encoding and retrieval of everyday activities.

Authors:  Maverick E Smith; Kimberly M Newberry; Heather R Bailey
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-12-19

6.  Measuring event segmentation: An investigation into the stability of event boundary agreement across groups.

Authors:  Karen Sasmita; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 7.  Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?

Authors:  Lilia Rissman; Asifa Majid
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-12

Review 8.  Studying the Developing Brain in Real-World Contexts: Moving From Castles in the Air to Castles on the Ground.

Authors:  Sam V Wass; Louise Goupil
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.