Literature DB >> 28079781

Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation for Pain Relief During Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Juan F Lisón1, Juan J Amer-Cuenca, Silvia Piquer-Martí, Vicente Benavent-Caballer, Gemma Biviá-Roig, Alejandro Marín-Buck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pain-relieving effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) during office-based hysteroscopy without sedation.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to the active TENS, placebo TENS, or control group. The active TENS intervention consisted of a varying high-frequency (80-100 Hz), 400-microseconds, individually adjusted, high-intensity TENS application with two self-adhesive electrodes placed parallel to the spinal cord at the T10-L1 and S2-S4 levels. In the placebo group, participants were connected to the TENS unit but delivering no electrical stimulation. The primary outcome was self-reported pain intensity (0-100 mm) measured on a visual analog scale at several stages (entry, contact, biopsy, and residual). The minimum clinically relevant difference for the visual analog scale has been previously reported as 10 mm. Sample size was calculated to provide 80% power to show a 10-mm difference (α=0.0125) in the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included duration of the procedure, vital parameters, vasovagal symptoms, and participant satisfaction index (0-10 rating scale).
RESULTS: A total of 138 women (46 per group) participated in the study between January 2016 and April 2016. No differences were found between groups regarding age, weight, body mass index, parity status, menopausal status, or previous hysteroscopy status. Visual analog scale scores highlighted a decrease in pain in the active TENS group compared with the placebo group (entry: -11 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] -17 to -5; contact: -21.9 mm, 95% CI -30 to -13.9; biopsy: -30.5 mm, 95% CI -47.1 to -13.8, P<.001). Moreover, the reduction in pain reached the minimum clinically relevant difference. Regarding satisfaction, results also revealed differences between active TENS and placebo groups (1.3, 95% CI 0.5-2.2, P=.001).
CONCLUSION: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain and increases patient satisfaction during office hysteroscopy without sedation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02647008.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28079781     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Updates in office hysteroscopy: a practical decalogue to perform a correct procedure.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Simone Bruni; Benito Chiofalo; Gaetano Riemma; Ricardo Bassil Lasmar
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-02-01

Review 2.  Characterising the Features of 381 Clinical Studies Evaluating Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Relief: A Secondary Analysis of the Meta-TENS Study to Improve Future Research.

Authors:  Mark I Johnson; Carole A Paley; Priscilla G Wittkopf; Matthew R Mulvey; Gareth Jones
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.948

3.  Warm distension fluid reduces pain severity in office hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Selim Gulucu; Bulent Cakmak
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.526

4.  Effects of high-frequency, high-intensity transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation versus intravenous opioids for pain relief after hysteroscopy: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Birgitta Platon; Sven-Egron Thörn; Clas Mannheimer; Paulin Andréll
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-07-28

5.  Randomized controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain relief during transvaginal oocyte retrieval using conscious sedation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Queenie Ho Yan Wong; Man Wa Lui; Sofie Shuk Fei Yung; Jennifer Ka Yee Ko; Raymond Hang Wun Li; Ernest Hung Yu Ng
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pancreatic cancer related pain.

Authors:  Lihua He; Keping Tan; Xianming Lin; Hui Yi; Xueliang Wang; Jiangsong Zhang; Jietao Lin; Lizhu Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Use of electroanalgesia and laser therapies as alternatives to opioids for acute and chronic pain management.

Authors:  Paul F White; Ofelia Loani Elvir Lazo; Lidia Galeas; Xuezhao Cao
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-12-21

8.  A Comparative Study between Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Fentanyl to Relieve Shoulder Pain during Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trail.

Authors:  Zahra Asgari; Zahra Tavoli; Reihaneh Hosseini; Masoomeh Nataj; Fatemeh Tabatabaei; Fatemeh Dehghanizadeh; Hosein Haji-Amoo-Assar; Mahdi Sepidarkish; Ali Montazeri
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in the Emergency Department for Pain Relief: A Preliminary Study of Feasibility and Efficacy.

Authors:  Casey A Grover; Mia Potter McKernan; Reb J H Close
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.