Literature DB >> 28079727

How Supervisor Experience Influences Trust, Supervision, and Trainee Learning: A Qualitative Study.

Leslie Sheu1, Jennifer R Kogan, Karen E Hauer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Appropriate trust and supervision facilitate trainees' growth toward unsupervised practice. The authors investigated how supervisor experience influences trust, supervision, and subsequently trainee learning.
METHOD: In a two-phase qualitative inductive content analysis, phase one entailed reviewing 44 internal medicine resident and attending supervisor interviews from two institutions (July 2013 to September 2014) for themes on how supervisor experience influences trust and supervision. Three supervisor exemplars (early, developing, experienced) were developed and shared in phase two focus groups at a single institution, wherein 23 trainees validated the exemplars and discussed how each impacted learning (November 2015).
RESULTS: Phase one: Four domains of trust and supervision varying with experience emerged: data, approach, perspective, clinical. Early supervisors were detail oriented and determined trust depending on task completion (data), were rule based (approach), drew on their experiences as trainees to guide supervision (perspective), and felt less confident clinically compared with more experienced supervisors (clinical). Experienced supervisors determined trust holistically (data), checked key aspects of patient care selectively and covertly (approach), reflected on individual experiences supervising (perspective), and felt comfortable managing clinical problems and gauging trainee abilities (clinical). Phase two: Trainees felt the exemplars reflected their experiences, described their preferences and learning needs shifting over time, and emphasized the importance of supervisor flexibility to match their learning needs.
CONCLUSIONS: With experience, supervisors differ in their approach to trust and supervision. Supervisors need to trust themselves before being able to trust others. Trainees perceive these differences and seek supervision approaches that align with their learning needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28079727     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001560

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  10 in total

1.  Trusted to Learn: a Qualitative Study of Clerkship Students' Perspectives on Trust in the Clinical Learning Environment.

Authors:  Nathan C Karp; Karen E Hauer; Leslie Sheu
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Trust, power and learning in workplace-based assessment: The trainee perspective.

Authors:  Damian J Castanelli; Jennifer M Weller; Elizabeth Molloy; Margaret Bearman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 7.647

3.  Influence of Clinical Competency Committee Review Process on Summative Resident Assessment Decisions.

Authors:  Daniel J Schumacher; Beth King; Michelle M Barnes; Sean P Elliott; Kathleen Gibbs; Jon F McGreevy; Javier Gonzalez Del Rey; Tanvi Sharma; Catherine Michelson; Alan Schwartz
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-08

4.  An act of performance: Exploring residents' decision-making processes to seek help.

Authors:  Iris Jansen; Renée E Stalmeijer; Milou E W M Silkens; Kiki M J M H Lombarts
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  New graduate doctors' preparedness for practice: a multistakeholder, multicentre narrative study.

Authors:  Lynn V Monrouxe; Alison Bullock; Gerard Gormley; Kathrin Kaufhold; Narcie Kelly; Camille Emilie Roberts; Karen Mattick; Charlotte Rees
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  How Trainees Come to Trust Supervisors in Workplace-Based Assessment: A Grounded Theory Study.

Authors:  Damian J Castanelli; Jennifer M Weller; Elizabeth Molloy; Margaret Bearman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 7.840

7.  How preceptors develop trust in continuity clinic residents and how trust influences supervision: A qualitative study.

Authors:  John C Penner; Karen E Hauer; Katherine A Julian; Leslie Sheu
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2021-12-16

8.  Will Any Road Get You There? Examining Warranted and Unwarranted Variation in Medical Education.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Jennifer R Kogan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 7.840

9.  Making Sense of Trainee Performance: Entrustment Decision-Making in Internal Medicine Program Directors.

Authors:  Katherine A Gielissen; Samantha L Ahle; Thilan P Wijesekera; Donna M Windish; Danya E Keene
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2020-08-31

10.  Patterns of direct observation and their impact during residency: general practice supervisors' views.

Authors:  Chris B T Rietmeijer; Daniëlle Huisman; Annette H Blankenstein; Henk de Vries; Fedde Scheele; Anneke W M Kramer; Pim W Teunissen
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 6.251

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.