Literature DB >> 28079145

Galectin-3 as a marker of interstitial atrial remodelling involved in atrial fibrillation.

Diana Hernández-Romero1, Juan Antonio Vílchez2, Álvaro Lahoz1, Ana I Romero-Aniorte1, Eva Jover1, Arcadio García-Alberola1, Rubén Jara-Rubio3, Carlos M Martínez4, Mariano Valdés1, Francisco Marín1.   

Abstract

Remodelling in the atria could appear as a result of hypertension, diabetes or ischaemic heart disease. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a mediator of profibrotic pathways and a potential biomarker of cardiac remodelling. We prospectively recruited consecutive patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. Preoperative Gal-3 levels were determined from serum samples, and the presence of fibrosis was assessed from atrial appendage tissue samples obtained during cardiac surgery. We included 100 patients with aortic valve or ischaemic heart diseases and 15 controls with permanent AF. Gal-3 levels were associated with sex, left atrial volume, previous cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, NYHA and NT-proBNP. We observed differences in serum Gal-3 concentrations between patients and controls with permanent AF (p = 0.020). We performed ROC curves related to fibrosis and established a cutoff point for Gal-3 >13.65 ng/ml. Multivariate analyses showed previous cardiac disease, NYHA scale and high Gal-3 to be independent predictors of fibrosis. After adjustment for confounding factors, atrial fibrosis remained the only independent factor for the development of AF (p = 0.022). High Gal-3 serum levels predict fibrosis of the atrial appendage. NYHA scale and previous cardiac disease were also associated with tissue fibrosis in patients undergoing surgery. Atrial fibrosis was the only independent predictor for post-operative AF occurrence in our model after correcting for confounding factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28079145      PMCID: PMC5228133          DOI: 10.1038/srep40378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Changes in atrial function and structure are known as atrial remodelling, which contributes to the development of atrial fibrillation (AF)1. AF is associated with an increased morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery and a longer hospital length of stay23. A significant association between fibrosis, inflammation, oxidative stress and the development, recurrence and perpetuation of AF has been hypothesized4. AF after cardiac surgery occurs in approximately 20–50% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery5. Numerous predisposing factors such as advanced age, hypertension, diabetes, left atrial enlargement, left ventricular hypertrophy, or intra-operative and post-operative factors such as atrial injury or ischaemia, have been associated with the development of post-operative AF6. Galectin-3 (Gal-3) is a beta-galactoside binding lectin that appears to be a mediator of cardiac fibrosis in a number of recent experimental studies. Gal-3 has been reported as a mediator of profibrotic pathways and as a potential biomarker of adverse cardiac remodelling7. Gal-3 is expressed by activated macrophages and induces cardiac fibroblasts to proliferate and deposit type I collagen in the myocardium89. This protein is linked to areas of fibrosis, suggesting an active role in modulation of the extracellular matrix. Therefore, Gal-3 appears to link pathways of inflammation and fibrosis, and it may contribute to the development of heart failure. Its role in atrial remodelling has scarcely been studied, and it was the main purpose for the present manuscript.

Results

We included 100 patients with predominantly aortic valve (n = 42) or ischaemic heart (n = 58) diseases and 15 controls with permanent AF, all of whom underwent cardiac surgery. Twenty-nine patients (29%) developed post-surgical AF, of whom 13 occurred during the Intensive Care Unit stay. Aortic patients showed a higher rate of AF development than coronary patients (41.5% vs 20.7%, p = 0.026). Patients developing AF had a longer stay in the Intensive Care Unit (p = 0.008) as well as longer overall hospitalization stays (p = 0.005). We observed differences in serum Gal-3 concentrations between patients and controls with permanent AF (14.25 ± 4.15 vs 17.61 ± 6.84 ng/mL; p = 0.020) (Table 1). The maximum and minimum Gal-3 levels were 23.10–7.00 for patients and 24.30–8.00 for controls. No differences between aortic and coronary patients (14.71 ± 4.34 vs 13.91 ± 4.02 ng/mL; p = 0.402) were observed. In a univariate regression model, Gal-3 was significantly associated with age, sex, left atrial volume, previous cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and NYHA functional class. In multivariate analysis, only sex, previous cardiac disease and diabetes mellitus remained independent predictors for Gal-3 values (all p < 0.05; Table 2). We evaluated correlations with NT-proBNP values, an established biomarker of wall stress and cardiac remodelling, and we found a significant positive correlation: r = 0.226, p = 0.045.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics of included patients (n: 100).

Clinical or demographic variable%, mean ± sd or median (IQR)
Age (years)65.1 ± 9.5
Male77
Coronary patient58
Aortic Valvular patient42
Smoking habit23
Hypertension70
Hypercholesterolemia65
Diabetes mellitus47
 DM insulin-dependent12
 DM under oral treatment38
Previous pulmonary chronic obstructive disease8
Previous thyroid disease6
Previous stroke9
NYHA2 (1–2)
EuroSCORE4 (2–5)
Left atrial diameter (mm)40.71 ± 5.80
Left atrial volume (Ellipsoidal; mm3)27.08 ± 8.81
Aortic clamp time (min)46.3 ± 16.8
Cardiopulmonary bypass pump time (min)90.37 ± 28.76
AF development in the Intensive Care Unit13
Total hospitalization time (days)9 (8–16)
Stay in the Intensive Care Unit (days)2 (2–4)
Stay in the Cardiology Department (days)7 (5–14)
Galectin concentration (mg/mL)14.25 ± 4.15

EuroSCORE: The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation. NYHA: New York Heart association functional class.

Table 2

Linear regression (stepwise mode) analysis for the predictors of Galectin-3 values.

 Univariate analysis B-coefficient (95% CI); p valueMultivariate analysis B-coefficient (95% CI); p value
Age0.11 (0.02–0.21); 0.0230.140
Gender, male2.75 (0.65–4.85); 0.0112.88 (0.81–4.95); 0.007
Left atrial volume0.10 (−0.10–0.21); 0.0730.127
Previous cardiac disease−2.56 (−4.67 to −0.45); 0.018−2.19 (−4.31 to −0.07); 0.044
Diabetes mellitus2.37 (0.58–4.17); 0.0102.08 (0.29–3.87); 0.024
Hypertension2.66 (0.69–4.63); 0.0090.050
NYHA scale1.01 (0.−0.35–2.37); 0.1440.151
Smoking habit−0.013 (−2.20–2.18); 0.991 
CrCl−1.06 (−5.84–3.72); 0.660 
Dyslipidaemia0.69 (−1.30–2.67); 0.494 

NYHA: New York Heart association functional class CrCl: Creatinine clearance.

Gal-3 levels as a predictor for atrial fibrosis

When evaluating atrial appendage interstitial fibrosis using Masson’s trichrome as indicated, 5 (4.5%) tissue samples showed low fibrosis (connective tissue infiltration Grade 1), 37 (40.2%) showed medium fibrosis (connective tissue infiltration Grade 2), and 50 (54.3%) showed intensive interstitial fibrosis (connective tissue infiltration Grade 3) (Fig. 1A–D). Eight samples were not evaluable due to different technical reasons. We performed ROC curves related to high-grade fibrosis (AUC: 0.630 ± 0.069 (CI95%: 0.494–0.762); p: 0.06; Fig. 2) and established a cutoff point for Gal-3 >13.65 ng/ml. Univariate analysis showed that age, previous cardiac disease, septal thickness, NYHA scale, creatinine clearance (CrCl) and high Gal-3 were associated with fibrosis (Table 3). Likewise, in multivariate analyses, we observed that previous cardiac disease, NYHA scale and high Gal-3 [OR (95%CI): 4.37 (1.16–16.41), p = 0.029; 2.93 (1.26–6.85), p = 0.013 and 3.29 (1.07–10.11), p = 0.037, respectively] remained independent predictors of fibrosis (Table 3).
Figure 1

Classification of the myocardial fibrosis assessed by Masson’s trichrome staining infiltration grades: grade 0 (A), 1 (B), 2 (C) and 3 (D).

Figure 2

Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) for evaluation of GAL-3 levels related to AF development in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Table 3

Logistic regression analysis for fibrosis presence.

 Univariate analysis OR (95%CI); p valueMultivariate analysis OR (95%CI); p value
Age1.03 (0.99–1.08); p = 0.1051.21 (1.15–3.08); p = 0.523
Gender, male1.15 (0.04–3.09); p = 0.770 
Hypertension1.28 (0.52–3.13); p = 0.580 
Diabetes mellitus1.12 (0.53–2.81); p = 0.622 
Previous cardiac disease2.44 (0.96–6.19); p = 0.0594.37 (1.16–16.41); p = 0.029
Left atrial volume0.99 (0.95–1.04); p = 0.949 
Septum thickness16.85 (2.01–136.36); p = 0.0088.23 (0.30–233.0); p = 0.211
Dyslipidaemia1.58 (0.66–3.76); p = 0.295 
Smoking habit1.03 (0.38–2.79); p = 0.947 
NYHA scale2.05 (1.09–3.83); p = 0.0242.93 (1.26–6.85); p = 0.013
CrCl0.98 (0.96–1.00); p = 0.0620.99 (0.97–1.01); p = 0.689
Galectin-3 >13.65 ng/mL3.33 (1.26–8.76); p = 0.0153.29 (1.07–10.11); p = 0.037

NYHA: New York Heart association functional class CrCl: Creatinine clearance.

Interstitial fibrosis in the prediction of atrial fibrillation occurrence

We also proposed to evaluate the incidence of tissue remodelling in the occurrence of AF in patients after cardiac surgery. Demographic factors including age and sex, clinical variables such as body mass index, left atrial volume, EuroSCORE index or type of surgery, and interstitial atrial fibrosis were associated with AF occurrence in a logistic regression analysis [OR (95%CI): 1.09 (1.00–1.11), p = 0.048; 4.96 (1.84–13.36), p = 0.031; 1.09 (0.98–1.21), p = 0.123; 1.06 (1.00–1.11), p = 0.042, 1.26 (1.03–1.54), p = 0.025; 2.61 (1.08–6.32), p = 0.034 and 2.18 (0.88–5.44), p = 0.094, respectively]. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, only atrial remodelling evaluated as tissue atrial fibrosis remained an independent factor for AF development [OR (95%CI): 3.77 (1.20–11.76), p = 0.022; Table 4] in our multivariate model. When reanalyzing by excluding subsequent confounding factors to avoid a problem of “over-fitting,” only the atrial fibrosis remained as an independent factor (data not shown).
Table 4

Logistic regression for the prediction of AF occurrence.

 UnivariateMultivariate
HR (CI95%)pHR (CI95%)p
Age1.09 (1.00–1.11)0.0481.00 (0.93–1.08)0.951
Male sex4.96 (1.84–13.36)0.0312.14 (0.58–7.88)0.252
Hypertension1.51 (0.56–4.03)0.415  
Hypercholesterolemia2.05 (0.77–5.42)0.150  
Diabetes mellitus1.31 (0.55–3.10)0.546  
Body mass index1.09 (0.98–1.21)0.1231.06 (0.92–1.22)0.443
Indexed left atrial volume1.06 (100–1.11)0.0421.03 (0.96–1.10)0.380
Left ventricular ejection fraction0.99 (0.96–1.03)0.797  
Clamping time0.98 (0.96–1.01)0.235  
Cardiopulmonary pump time0.99 (0.98–1.01)0.679  
Type of surgery (valve surgery vs CABG)2.61(1.08–6.32)0.0342.73(0.63–11.86)0.181
EuroSCORE1.26 (1.03–1.54)0.0251.28 (0.91–1.79)0.150
Interstitial atrial appendage fibrosis2.18 (0.88–5.44)0.0943.77 (1.20–11.76)0.022

CABG: coronary artery bypass grafting; EuroSCORE: The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation; ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARBs: angiotensin receptor blockers; CA: calcium antagonists.

Discussion

Gal-3 has been reported to be a biomarker for cardiac fibrosis. Our results support previous studies since we found a clear association between Gal-3 serum levels and interstitial fibrosis measured in the right atrial appendage obtained by resection. Fibrosis is a result of structural remodelling, and it has been proposed as the main arrhythmogenic substrate perpetuating AF10. In our cohort, 20% of patients showed clinical AF during their hospitalization stay after coronary surgery. This finding is consistent with previous data indicating AF occurrence in approximately 20–50% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery (5). Pre-surgical levels of Gal-3 suggest an active remodelling process in the atrial appendage tissue prior to the surgical intervention. In addition, we also found a positive correlation between Gal-3 and NT-proBNP levels as a biomarker of established wall stress and cardiac remodelling, supporting our hypothesis. In previous studies, we observed that pre-surgical hsTnT11 and vWF levels12 were indicators of ongoing subclinical myocyte damage, endothelial dysfunction and remodelling in the atria. Both biomarkers resulted were therefore associated with AF development in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Here, we found an association between Gal-3 levels and fibrosis when analyzing all the available samples. Our results indicate that Gal-3 pro-fibrotic effects and interstitial atrial remodelling are converging processes in fibrosis development. Whether or not this fibrosis is the responsible cause for AF development, is an assumption that we cannot demonstrate with our results, but is supported by the clear association between fibrosis and AF development. Our data describing higher values of left atrial volume and septal thickness in both patients presenting with intensive fibrosis and in patients who developed AF also reinforce the same idea. In this context, surgery would act as a trigger for the development of AF in a predisposed environment involving highly remodelled tissue. In addition, we found higher Gal-3 levels in a positive control cohort of permanent AF patients, supporting our hypothesis. Recent studies have found a correlation between Gal-3 levels and atrial remodelling, including the extent of left atrial fibrosis and atrial electromechanical properties13. This study is limited by its observational design; we could explore only associations, and no causality is implied. The recruitment protocol did not guarantee the exclusion of patients with previously silent AF from the study. Although Gal-3 level has been proposed as a biomarker of fibrosis in cardiovascular diseases, we cannot ignore possible changes in Gal-3 levels over time. Another limitation is related to the studied tissue samples, as we had no access to left atrial appendage tissue. In conclusion, we can summarize that Gal-3 levels are higher in controls with permanent AF versus patients without previous known AF undergoing cardiac surgery. High Gal-3 serum values predict fibrosis of the right atrial appendage. Other clinical factors such as NYHA scale and previous cardiac disease were also associated with the presence of fibrosis in patients undergoing surgery. Atrial fibrosis was the only independent predictor for post-operative AF occurrence in our model, even after correcting for confounding factors.

Methods

Patients

We prospectively recruited consecutive patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass from November 2010 until February 2012. We excluded patients with previous AF (paroxysmal or permanent), unstable angina, hepatic or renal failure (creatinine clearance <50 ml/min), and chronic inflammatory or neoplasic diseases. Patients undergoing urgent surgery and those with a previous history of pacemakers, infectious endocarditis and those undergoing AF-related surgery were also excluded. We documented AF during the post-operative period in the Intensive Care Unit by continuous 3-derivations telemetry and by a Holter device once the patient was in the hospitalization cardiac surgery unit. Holter monitoring was extended until a maximum of 10 days after surgery. In addition, a 12 derivations electrocardiogram was performed in symptomatic patients and daily during the hospitalization. AF development was defined as an episode of AF lasting for more than 2 minutes in any of the ECG registries. All echocardiographic measurements were performed off-line by the same accredited cardiologist who was unaware of clinical and laboratory data14. Left atrial volume was calculated according to the ellipsoid model that assumes that the left atrium can be adequately represented as a prolate ellipsoid with a volume of 4p⁄3(L⁄2)(D1⁄2)(D2⁄2), where L is the long-axis (ellipsoid) and D1 and D2 are the orthogonal short-axis dimensions15. Left atrial volume calculations were indexed to body surface area calculated according to Gehan and George16. The study was carried out according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca. All the included patients gave informed consent to participation.

Blood samples and laboratory assays

Venepuncture was performed the morning of cardiac surgery with the patient fasting for >12 hours. We collected samples immediately before cardiac surgery. Plasma fractions were obtained by centrifugation for 15 minutes at 3500 × g. Aliquots were stored at −40 °C to allow batch analysis in a blinded fashion. Preoperative Gal-3 levels were determined in defrosted serum samples by ELFA (Enzyme-Linked Fluorescent Assay) in a MiniVidas analyzer (BioMérieux®, France). The inter-assay and intra-assay coefficients of variation were 6.5% and 1.6%, respectively. The measured range was 3.3–100 ng/mL, the lower limit of detection was 2.2 ng/mL and the limit of quantification was 3.3 ng/mL. Levels of preoperative NT-proBNP were measured as described elsewhere11.

Obtaining and staining right atrial appendage tissue

Atrial appendage tissue was obtained during surgery by cannulation for the extracorporeal circulation. This cannulation was performed directly into the right atria with non-absorbable suture in a “tobacco bag” shape. To provide adequate cannula apposition, the bag was opened and cut. The remaining appendage tissue was collected for the tissue study objectives. All recruited subjects gave their informed consent to participate in the study. All surgical procedures were performed under cardiopulmonary bypass, with mild hypothermia (30 °C), cardioplegic arrest of the heart and left ventricular (LV) venting through the right superior pulmonary vein. We used anterograde and retrograde cold intermittent blood cardioplegia (Cardi-Braun®; B-Braun, Inc., Barcelona, Spain) for myocardial protection. The tissue samples were processed, paraffin embedded and cut into 2–3 μm sections. For histochemical evaluation of connective tissue infiltration within the myocardial tissues, a Masson’s trichrome staining was performed on sections from affected specimens by an automatized staining system (Dako Artisan, Dako, Carpinteria, California, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The degree of connective tissue infiltration was measured using a qualitative scale from 0 to 3 (0 was negative; 1, mild; 2, medium; and 3, high infiltration) at the location within the tissue (perivascular or interstitial fibrosis). All assessments were blinded and performed twice to ensure the repeatability of the results. The analysis was made using an Axio Scope A1 transmitted-light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are presented as counts (percentages), while continuous variables are presented as the mean ± SD (standard deviation) or median (25th–75th percentiles), as appropriate. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check for normal distribution of continuous data. Variables associated with Gal-3 values were studied by linear regression analysis (stepwise mode). We constructed areas under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve for Gal-3 related to high grade fibrosis. The cutoff point with the best sensitivity and specificity was chosen for each case, as assessed by ROC curves. Gal-3 levels were dichotomized as ‘low’ or ‘high’ according to whether the circulating levels were under or over the calculated threshold (cutoff). This dichotomy for Gal-3 levels was assessed via the logistic regression model to explore the overall association between fibrosis in tissues obtained by myectomy and Gal-3 values. We considered fibrosis to be intensive when the degree of connective tissue infiltration was 2 or 3 with Masson’s trichrome stain. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the predictive variables for AF development including fibrosis. All p values < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Hernández-Romero, D. et al. Galectin 3 as marker of interstitial atrial remodeling involved in atrial fibrillation. Sci. Rep. 7, 40378; doi: 10.1038/srep40378 (2017). Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  15 in total

1.  Report on the European Association of Echocardiography accreditations in echocardiography: December 2003-September 2006.

Authors:  Kevin F Fox; Bogdan A Popescu; Sophie Janiszewski; P Nihoyannopoulos; A G Fraser; F J Pinto
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-12-18

Review 2.  Recommendations for chamber quantification.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack Shanewise; Scott Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William Stewart
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-02-02

Review 3.  Atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation: mechanisms and implications.

Authors:  Stanley Nattel; Brett Burstein; Dobromir Dobrev
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-04

4.  Estimation of human body surface area from height and weight.

Authors:  E A Gehan; S L George
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1970-08

5.  The Association of Serum Galectin-3 Levels with Atrial Electrical and Structural Remodeling.

Authors:  Muhammed U Yalcin; Kadri M Gurses; Duygu Kocyigit; Hande Canpinar; Ugur Canpolat; Banu Evranos; Hikmet Yorgun; Mehmet L Sahiner; Ergun B Kaya; Tuncay Hazirolan; Lale Tokgozoglu; Mehmet A Oto; Necla Ozer; Dicle Guc; Kudret Aytemir
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-03-27

Review 6.  Galectin-3 in cardiac remodeling and heart failure.

Authors:  Rudolf A de Boer; Lili Yu; Dirk J van Veldhuisen
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2010-03

7.  Von Willebrand factor is associated with atrial fibrillation development in ischaemic patients after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Diana Hernández-Romero; Álvaro Lahoz; Vanessa Roldan; Eva Jover; Ana I Romero-Aniorte; Carlos M Martinez; Rubén Jara-Rubio; José María Arribas; Arcadio Garcia-Alberola; Sergio Cánovas; Mariano Valdés; Francisco Marín
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  [Epidemiology and new predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary surgery].

Authors:  José M Arribas-Leal; Domingo A Pascual-Figal; Pedro L Tornel-Osorio; Francisco Gutiérrez-García; Julio J García-Puente del Corral; Víctor G Ray-López; Mariano Valdés-Chavarrí; Ramón Arcas-Meca
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.753

9.  Independent risk factors for atrial fibrillation in a population-based cohort. The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  E J Benjamin; D Levy; S M Vaziri; R B D'Agostino; A J Belanger; P A Wolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Electrical, contractile and structural remodeling during atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Maurits Allessie; Jannie Ausma; Ulrich Schotten
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 10.787

View more
  19 in total

1.  Association of plasma-soluble ST2 and galectin-3 with cardiovascular events and mortality following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Dipal M Patel; Heather Thiessen-Philbrook; Jeremiah R Brown; Eric McArthur; Dennis G Moledina; Sherry G Mansour; Michael G Shlipak; Jay L Koyner; Peter Kavsak; Richard P Whitlock; Allen D Everett; David J Malenka; Amit X Garg; Steven G Coca; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 2.  β-Adrenoceptor activation affects galectin-3 as a biomarker and therapeutic target in heart disease.

Authors:  Xiao-Jun Du; Wei-Bo Zhao; My-Nhan Nguyen; Qun Lu; Helen Kiriazis
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-07       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Biomarkers in the clinical management of patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure.

Authors:  Ioanna Koniari; Eleni Artopoulou; Dimitrios Velissaris; Mark Ainslie; Virginia Mplani; Georgia Karavasili; Nicholas Kounis; Grigorios Tsigkas
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 4.  Role of oxidative stress-related biomarkers in heart failure: galectin 3, α1-antitrypsin and LOX-1: new therapeutic perspective?

Authors:  Valter Lubrano; Silvana Balzan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.396

5.  Molecular Imaging for In Vivo Tracking and Detection of Galectin Binding Partners.

Authors:  Thais Canassa De Leo; Sofia Nascimento Dos Santos; Emerson Soares Bernardes; Richard D Cummings; Sean R Stowell; Marcelo Dias-Baruffi
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

6.  Mechanisms responsible for increased circulating levels of galectin-3 in cardiomyopathy and heart failure.

Authors:  My-Nhan Nguyen; Yidan Su; Donna Vizi; Lu Fang; Andris H Ellims; Wei-Bo Zhao; Helen Kiriazis; Xiao-Ming Gao; Junichi Sadoshima; Andrew J Taylor; Julie R McMullen; Anthony M Dart; David M Kaye; Xiao-Jun Du
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Galectin-3 level predicts response to ablation and outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and systolic heart failure.

Authors:  Nicolas Clementy; Bruno Garcia; Clémentine André; Arnaud Bisson; Nazih Benhenda; Bertrand Pierre; Anne Bernard; Laurent Fauchier; Eric Piver; Dominique Babuty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Circulating Cardiac Biomarkers in Diabetes Mellitus: A New Dawn for Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Alexander E Berezin; Alexander A Berezin
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.945

9.  Noninvasive biomarker-based risk stratification for development of new onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Farhan Rizvi; Mahek Mirza; Susan Olet; Melissa Albrecht; Stacie Edwards; Larisa Emelyanova; David Kress; Gracious R Ross; Ekhson Holmuhamedov; A Jamil Tajik; Bijoy K Khandheria; Arshad Jahangir
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 4.164

10.  Are the atrial natriuretic peptides a missing link predicting low-voltage areas in atrial fibrillation? Introducing the novel biomarker-based atrial fibrillation substrate prediction (ANP) score.

Authors:  Timm Seewöster; Petra Büttner; Samira Zeynalova; Gerhard Hindricks; Jelena Kornej
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.