| Literature DB >> 28079130 |
Xiaoliang Chen1,2, Xiaoxiao Lu3, Jiansong Chen1, Di Wu1, Fuman Qiu1, Huali Xiong1, Zihua Pan1, Lei Yang1, Binyao Yang1, Chenli Xie4, Yifeng Zhou5, Dongsheng Huang1, Yumin Zhou1, Jiachun Lu1.
Abstract
It is highly possible that copy number variations (CNVs) in susceptible regions have effects on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) development, while long noncoding RNA (lncRNAs) have been shown to cause COPD. We hypothesized that the common CNV, named nsv823469 located on 6p22.1, and covering lncRNAs (major histocompatibility complex, class I, A (HLA-A) and HLA complex group 4B (HCG4B)) has an effect on COPD risk. This association was assessed through a two-stage case-control study, and was further confirmed with COPD and pulmonary function-based family analyses, respectively. The copy number loss (0-copy/1-copy) of nsv823469 significantly decreased risk of COPD compared with normal (2-copy) (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.69-0.85). The loss allele, inducing copy number loss of nsv823469, has a tendency to transmit to offspring or siblings (P = 0.010) and is associated with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (P = 0.030). Furthermore, the copy number loss of nsv823469 in normal pulmonary tissue decreases the expression levels of HCG4B (r = 0.315, P = 0.031) and HLA-A (r = 0.296, P = 0.044). Our data demonstrates that nsv823469 plays a role in COPD and pulmonary function inheritance by potentially altering expression of HCG4B.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28079130 PMCID: PMC5227687 DOI: 10.1038/srep40060
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Association between the nsv823469 copy numbers and COPD risk in case-control studies.
| Genotype/Allele | Case | Control | Crude | Adjusted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Southern Chinese | 1025 | 1061 | <0.001 | ||
| Co-dominant model | 2895.2 | ||||
| 2-copy | 690 (67.32) | 642 (60.51) | 1.00 (ref.) | 1.00 (ref.) | |
| 1-copy | 232 (22.63) | 244 (23.00) | 0.87 (0.71–1.08) | 0.88 (0.71–1.09) | |
| 0-copy | 103 (10.05) | 175 (16.49) | 0.54 (0.42–0.71) | 0.55 (0.42–0.72) | |
| Additive model | 2876.2 | ||||
| 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 | 0.77 (0.68–0.87) | 0.77 (0.68–0.87) | |||
| Dominant model | 2884.7 | ||||
| (0 + 1) vs. 2 | 0.74 (0.62–0.89) | 0.74 (0.62–0.89) | |||
| Recessive model | 2877.4 | ||||
| (1 + 2) vs. 0 | 1.77 (1.36–2.29) | 1.76 (1.35–2.29) | |||
| Eastern Chinese | 486 | 616 | 0.005 | ||
| Co-dominant model | 1516.3 | ||||
| 2-copy | 333 (68.52) | 374 (60.71) | 1.00 (ref.) | 1.00 (ref.) | |
| 1-copy | 111 (22.84) | 153 (24.84) | 0.82 (0.61–1.08) | 0.89 (0.66–1.21) | |
| 0-copy | 42 (8.64) | 89 (14.45) | 0.53 (0.36–0.79) | 0.53 (0.37–0.77) | |
| Additive model | 1504.4 | ||||
| 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 | 0.75 (0.63–0.90) | 0.76 (0.65–0.91) | |||
| Dominant model | 1509.1 | ||||
| (0 + 1) vs. 2 | 0.71 (0.55–0.91) | 0.73 (0.57–0.94) | |||
| Recessive model | 1504.7 | ||||
| (1 + 2) vs. 0 | 1.85 (1.30–2.65) | 1.81 (1.26–2.60) | |||
| Merged above population | 1511 | 1677 | <0.001 | ||
| Co-dominant model | 4414.8 | ||||
| 2-copy | 1023 (67.70) | 1016 (60.58) | 1.00 (ref.) | 1.00 (ref.) | |
| 1-copy | 343 (22.70) | 397 (23.67) | 0.88 (0.74–1.04) | 0.88 (0.74–1.05) | |
| 0-copy | 145 (9.60) | 264 (15.75) | 0.54 (0.43–0.67) | 0.54 (0.44–0.68) | |
| Additive model | 4383.7 | ||||
| 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 | 0.76 (0.69–0.84) | 0.77 (0.69–0.85) | |||
| Dominant model | 4397.3 | ||||
| (0 + 1) vs. 2 | 0.73 (0.63–0.85) | 0.74 (0.64–0.86) | |||
| Recessive model | 4385.3 | ||||
| (1 + 2) vs. 0 | 1.80 (1.46–2.22) | 1.79 (1.44–2.21) |
aP values of a two-sided χ2 test for genotypes distribution between the cases and controls.
bAdjusted in a logistic regression model with age, sex, smoking, biomass as fuels and drinking.
cAkaike information criterion (AIC) value.
FBAT analysis of the nsv823469 copy numbers in 157 COPD pedigrees families.
| Allele | Afreq | Fam# | S-E(S>) | Var(S) | Z | Logistic regression model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | OR (95% CI) | |||||||
| Loss allele | 0.232 | 48 | 9.917 | 14.862 | 2.572 | 0.010102 | <0.001 | 0.50 (0.34–0.73) |
| Normal allele | 0.768 | 48 | −9.917 | 14.862 | −2.572 | 0.010102 | ||
Abbreviation: fam#: Number of nuclear families informative for the FBAT analysis (at least one parent must be heterozygous). S: Observed transmission for each allele; E(S) = Expected transmission for each allele. Var(S): Variance of the observed transmission for each allele.
aAdjusted by age, sex, smoking, biomass as fuels and drinking under additive model.
The pulmonary function traits on nsv823469 and heritability of it in 391 families.
| Traits | The distribution of lung function traits on nsv823469 | Family based analysis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-copy | 1-copy | 2-copy | Kruskal-Wallis test | qTDT test | |||||
| N | M ± SE | N | M ± SE | N | M ± SE | Z | |||
| FEV1 | 110 | 2.69 ± 0.85 | 279 | 2.35 ± 0.81 | 598 | 2.34 ± 0.81 | 0.001 | ||
| FVC | 110 | 3.24 ± 0.94 | 279 | 2.93 ± 0.9 | 598 | 3.01 ± 0.93 | 0.012 | 1.91 | 0.056 |
| FEV1/FVC | 110 | 0.83 ± 0.07 | 279 | 0.79 ± 0.09 | 598 | 0.77 ± 0.12 | <0.001 | 1.20 | 0.056 |
| FEV1/FEV1-predicted | 110 | 0.85 ± 0.22 | 279 | 0.79 ± 0.16 | 598 | 0.78 ± 0.17 | <0.001 | 1.79 | 0.073 |
Abbrev: Mean ± Standard Error, M ± SE.
aCalculated by Rabinowitz formulas.
Effect of the CNVnsv823469 on FEV1 in total 987 subjects from the 391 families.
| Variants | 2-copy | 1-copy | 0-copy | Kruskal-Wallis test | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | M ± SE | n | M ± SE | n | M ± SE | ||
| Total | 597 | 2.34 ± 0.81 | 280 | 2.35 ± 0.81 | 110 | 2.69 ± 0.85 | 0.001 |
| Sex | |||||||
| Male | 275 | 2.69 ± 0.90 | 126 | 2.77 ± 0.86 | 52 | 3.15 ± 0.83 | 0.003 |
| Female | 322 | 2.05 ± 0.63 | 154 | 2.01 ± 0.56 | 58 | 2.28 ± 0.64 | 0.015 |
| Age | |||||||
| ≤60years | 426 | 2.64 ± 0.71 | 197 | 2.64 ± 0.73 | 82 | 2.91 ± 0.78 | 0.023 |
| >60years | 171 | 1.61 ± 0.60 | 83 | 1.65 ± 0.52 | 28 | 2.04 ± 0.75 | 0.010 |
| Smoking status | |||||||
| Ever smoked | 145 | 2.45 ± 0.90 | 67 | 2.61 ± 0.88 | 24 | 3.16 ± 0.83 | 0.003 |
| Never smoked | 452 | 2.31 ± 0.8 | 213 | 2.26 ± 0.77 | 86 | 2.56 ± 0.82 | 0.020 |
| Pack-years smoked(packs) | |||||||
| ≥20 | 55 | 2.25 ± 0.83 | 27 | 2.23 ± 0.77 | 9 | 2.63 ± 0.87 | 0.528 |
| 0<packs<20 | 90 | 2.58 ± 0.92 | 40 | 2.86 ± 0.87 | 15 | 3.47 ± 0.63 | 0.002 |
| Using biomass as fuels | |||||||
| Ever used | 410 | 2.24 ± 0.74 | 199 | 2.27 ± 0.78 | 80 | 2.52 ± 0.77 | 0.021 |
| Never used | 187 | 2.59 ± 0.95 | 81 | 2.54 ± 0.86 | 30 | 3.13 ± 0.92 | 0.015 |
| Drinking status | |||||||
| Ever drunk | 115 | 2.78 ± 0.75 | 57 | 2.74 ± 0.82 | 31 | 2.87 ± 0.92 | 0.835 |
| Never drunk | 482 | 2.24 ± 0.81 | 223 | 2.24 ± 0.78 | 79 | 2.62 ± 0.82 | 0.001 |
Abbrev: Mean ± Standard Error, M ± SE.
Figure 1The expression of nsv823469 covering gene and lncRNA.
(a) Effect of the CNV copy number on HCG4B; (b) Effect of the CNV copy number on HLA-H; (c) Effect of the CNV copy number on HLA-A; Bars = SD. P value was inferred with the Kruskal-Wallis test. As shown, significant deviation was observed for HCG4B and HLA-A but not HLA-H between different copy number tissues; (d) Correlation between the expression of HCG4B and HLA-A. A significant correlation between HCG4B and HLA-A was observed. The spearman rank correlation test was used.