| Literature DB >> 28079108 |
Jung Chao1, Yuntao Dai2, Hao-Yuan Cheng3, Wing Lam4, Yung-Chi Cheng4, Ke Li5, Wen-Huang Peng6, Li-Heng Pao7,8, Ming-Tsuen Hsieh6, Xue-Mei Qin5, Meng-Shiou Lee6.
Abstract
Uraria crinita is widely used as a popular folk drink; however, little is known about how the post-harvest operations affect the chemical composition and bioactivity of UC. We assessed three drying methods (Oven-drying, Air-drying, Sun-drying), as well as the Oven-drying temperature using metabolomics approaches and bioactivity assays. The samples processed at 40 degree show a greater effect on the levels of estrogen receptor-alpha activity and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 activity, anti-oxidative activity, and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition compared with the other samples. A multivariate analysis showed a clear separation between the 40 degree Oven-dried samples and the other samples, which is consistent with the results of bioactivity assay. These results are ascribed to at least two-fold increase in the concentrations of flavonoids, spatholosineside A and triterpenoids in the oven-dried samples compared with the other groups. The proposed Oven-drying method at 40 degree results in an improved quality of UC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28079108 PMCID: PMC5227699 DOI: 10.1038/srep38763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The 600 MHz 1H NMR spectra of extracts of the roots of Uraria crinita processed by Oven-drying (A) Air-drying in the Shade (B), and Sun-drying (C). The assignments of the metabolites are listed in Table 1. 1, Triterpenoid (with an olean-12-ene skeleton); 2, Leucine; 3, Isoleucine; 4, Valine; 5, Spatholosineside A; 6, Fatty acid; 7, Threonine/Lactate; 8, Alanine; 9, Arginine; 10, Acetate; 11. Proline; 12. Glutamine; 13. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA); 14. Succinate; 15. Citrate; 16. Aspartate; 17. Asparagine; 18. Choline; 19. Betaine; 20. Pinitol; 21. Fructose; 22. β-Glucose; 23. α-Glucose; 24. Sucrose; 25. Unknown 1 (with a para —benzene group); 26. Tyrosine; 27. Apigenin 6-C-β-D- apiofuranosyl (1→2)-α-D-xylopyranoside; 28, Vitexin; 29. Tryptophan; 30. Phenylalanine; 31. Salicylic acid; 32. Adenosine; and 33. Formate.
Assignment of the NMR signals for the Uraria crinita samples.
| Metabolites | Assignment | 1H (multiplicity), coupling constant, multiplicity | 13C | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Triterpenoid (with olean-12-ene skeleton) | Six angular methyl groups | 0.81※, 0.89, 0.92, 0.96,0.99,1.08,1.11 (s) | 19.6, 16.6, 16.0, 32.1, 17.01, 28.9, 32.1 | COSY, JRE, HSQC, HMBC |
| C12-H | 5.23 (br) | 123.5 | |||
| 2 | Leucine | β-CH2 | 1.72 (m) | 46.5 | Database, COSY, HSQC |
| δ-CH3 | 0.98 | 22.4 | |||
| 3 | Isoleucine | γ-CH3 | 1.03 (d, | 17.9 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE, GC-MS |
| δ-CH3 | 0.98 (t) | 14.1 | |||
| 4 | Valine | α-CH2 | 3.60 | 56.7 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| γ-CH3 | 1.01 (d, | 19.14 | |||
| γ‘-CH3 | 1.06 (d, | 24.57 | |||
| 5 | Spatholosineside A | C5-H | 8.07 (d, | 157 | Mao, |
| C6-H | 6.54 (d, | 116.69 | |||
| β-Glc-1H | 4.89(d, | 103 | |||
| α-Rhm-1H | 4.74(br) | 101 | |||
| α-Rhm-6H | 1.14(d, | 17 | |||
| CH3 | 2.46 (s) | 16.0 | |||
| 6 | Fatty acid | CH3 | 0.87 | 16.4 | Fatty acid |
| CH2 | 1.30 | 29.7 | |||
| Double bound | 5.38 (m) | 130 | |||
| =CCH | 2.04 | 23 | |||
| 7 | Threonine/Lactate | β-CH | 4.28 | 69.1 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| γ-CH3 | 1.34 (d, | 22.5 | |||
| 8 | Alanine | α-CH | 3.71 (d, | 53.8 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| β-CH3 | 1.49 (d, J = 7.2), | 17.15 | |||
| 9 | Arginine | β-CH2 | 1.9 (m) | 26.3 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| γ -CH2 | 1.67,1.71 (m) | 24.1 | |||
| δ-CH3 | 3.24 (t)* | 41.96 | |||
| 10 | Acetate | CH3 | 1.92 (s)* | 24.3 | Database, HSQC, HMBC |
| 11 | Proline | α-CH | 4.08 (m) | 64.1 | Database, COSY, HSQC |
| β-CH2 | 2.32–2.38 (m) | 30.0 | |||
| γ -CH2 | 1.95–2.11 (m) | 25.2 | |||
| 12 | Glutamine | α-CH | 3.71 | 55.39 | Database, COSY, HSQC |
| β-CH2 | 2.15 (m) | 29.68 | |||
| γ -CH2 | 2.46 (m) | 34.48 | |||
| α′-CH | 2.70 (d) | ||||
| 13 | γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) | α-CH2 | 2.30 (t)* | 37.3 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| β-CH2 | 1.89 (m) | 26.8 | |||
| γ -CH2 | 3.01 (t) | 42.1 | |||
| 14 | Succinate | CH2 | 2.44 (s) | 35.8 | Database, HSQC |
| 15 | Citrate | α-CH | 2.54 (d) | 48.6 | Database, COSY, JRE HSQC |
| α′-CH | 2.70 (d) | ||||
| 16 | Aspartate | β-CH | 2.63 (dd)* | 37.53 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| β-CH | 2.81 (dd) | 35.20 | |||
| 17 | Asparagine | β-CH | 2.81 (dd) | 35.20 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| β′-CH | 2.95 (dd)* | 35.56 | |||
| 18 | Choline | N-CH3 | 3.21 (s)※ | 54.3 | Database, COSY, HSQC |
| N-CH2 | 4.05 | 70.3 | |||
| CH2OH | 3.55 | 56.2 | |||
| 19 | Betaine | NCH3 | 3.28 (s)* | 53.4 | Database, COSY, HSQC |
| CH2OH | 3.91 (s) | 66.7 | |||
| 20 | Pinitol | 6-OCH3 | 3.61 (s)※ | 62.2 | Database, COSY, HSQC, TOCSY, GC-MS |
| CH-OH | 3.33 | 85.5 | |||
| CH-OH | 3.64 | 74.8 | |||
| CH-OH | 3.72 | 73.4 | |||
| CH-OH | 3.78 | 72.6 | |||
| CH-OH | 3.96 (t) | 74.4 | |||
| 21 | Fructose | C3-H | 4.08 | 82.9 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE, |
| C4-H | 3.96 (br) | 77 | |||
| C5-H | 4.03 | 82.2 | |||
| 22 | β-Glucose | β-C1H | 4.58 (d, | 97.03 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| 23 | α-Glucose | α-C1H | 5.19 (d, | 92.7 | |
| 24 | Sucrose | Glc-C1H | 5.41 (d, | 92.6 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| Fru-C3H | 4.17 (d, | 77.69 | |||
| 25 | U1 ( | 6.73(d, | 103 | HSQC, HMBC | |
| 7.12(d, | 132 | ||||
| 155 | |||||
| 26 | Tyrosine | C2,6 -H | 7.18 (d, | 131.29 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| C3,5 -H | 6.84 (d, | 117 | |||
| β-CH | 3.02 (dd, | 42.3 | |||
| β′-CH | 3.20 (dd, | 42.3 | |||
| 27 | Apigenin 6-C-β-D- apiofuranosyl(1→2)-α-D-xylopyranoside | C3-H | 6.80 (s) | 103 | Mao, |
| C8-H | 6.65 (s) | 94 | |||
| C2′-H, C6′-H | 7.92 (d, | 129.8 | |||
| C3′-H, C5′-H | 7.02 (d, | 116.7 | |||
| β-Xyl-C1-H | 4.55 (br, s) | 73.7 | |||
| α-Api-C1-H | 5.15 (br, s) | 108 | |||
| 28 | Vitexin | C3-H | 6.60 (s) | 105.6 | Mao, |
| C6-H | 6.39 (s) | 99 | |||
| C2′-H, C6′-H | 8.01 (d, | 129.6 | |||
| C3′-H, C5′-H | 7.02 (d, | 117.2 | |||
| Glc-C1-H | 4.55 (d, | 73.8 | |||
| 29 | Tryptophan | C2-H | 7.29 (s)* | 124.9 | Database, COSY, HSQC, JRE |
| C4-H | 7.72 (d, | 119 | |||
| C5-H | 7.14 (t, | 122.5 | |||
| C6-H | 7.22 (t, | 119.7 | |||
| C7-H | 7.46 (d, | 112.3 | |||
| 30 | Phenylalanine | C2,6-H | 7.34 (m) | 129.3 | Database, COSY, HSQC |
| C3,5-H | 7.41 (m) | 129.1 | |||
| C4-H | 7.39 (m) | 133.1 | |||
| 31 | Salicylic acid | C3-H | 6.75 (d, | 115.5 | Mao, |
| C4-H | 7.38 (t, | 135.1 | |||
| C5-H | 6.90 (t, | 119.6 | |||
| C6-H | 7.8 (d, | 131.0 | |||
| 32 | Adenosine | C1′-H | 6.02 (d, | 89.7 | Database, HSQC, JRE |
| C2-H | 8.35 (s)s※ | 152.7 | |||
| C8-H | 8.23 (s) | 142.8 | |||
| 33 | Formate | HC=O | 8.47 (s) | — | Database |
Figure 2Multivariate data analysis of the 1H NMR data obtained from extracts of Uraria crinita processed using the three different drying methods.
(A) PCA score plot. (B) Dendrogram plot using HCA. (C) Plots of the OPLS-DA scores of the Oven-drying and Shade-drying samples. (D) Coefficient-coded loading plots of the Oven-drying and Shade-drying samples. (E) Plots of the OPLS-DA scores of the Oven-drying and Sun-drying samples. (F) Coefficient-coded loading plots of the Oven-drying and Sun-drying samples.
Normalized integral values of the metabolites from the NMR spectra across the extracts from Uraria crinita that were processed by the three different drying methods.
| Metabolites | Normalized integral value (NMR signal × 103) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Shade | Oven | |
| Threonine/Lactate | 415.73 ± 27.66 | 385.51 ± 40.08 | 457.86 ± 30.77 |
| Arginine | 621.33 ± 58.22 | 560.45 ± 100.78 | 1113.02 ± 54.82 |
| γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) | 549.74 ± 36.83 | 620.03 ± 83.73 | 440.37 ± 48.5 |
| Aspartate | 572.5 ± 73.51 | 485.34 ± 158.61 | 926.74 ± 90.1 |
| Asparagine | 2121.02 ± 77.78 | 2056.79 ± 191.38 | 2033.91 ± 182.48 |
| Tyrosine | 14.51 ± 4.47 | 9.83 ± 4.69 | 88.78 ± 25.17 |
| Tryptophan | — | — | 44.91 ± 14.32 |
| Phenylalanine | — | — | 22.99 ± 9.34 |
| Salicylic acid | 16.17 ± 1.04 | 20.6 ± 2.15 | 43.13 ± 7.65 |
| Acetate | 519.17 ± 40.46 | 894.45 ± 89.02 | 948.17 ± 51.51 |
| Formate | 13.55 ± 2.06 | 10.67 ± 1.95 | 23.75 ± 4.00 |
| Glucose | 102.87 ± 11.86 | 66.56 ± 13.39 | 52.32 ± 10.15 |
| Sucrose | 313.26 ± 8.78 | 409.98 ± 20.35 | 52.55 ± 1.71 |
| Pinitol | 2314.26 ± 136.45 | 2525.75 ± 389.88 | 2089.93 ± 116.36 |
| Adenosine | 12.69 ± 1.06 | 8.62 ± 1.19 | 5.14 ± 0.73 |
| Choline | 949.35 ± 48.34 | 948.27 ± 40.55 | 596.77 ± 34.31 |
| Betaine | 141.12 ± 18.1 | 112.61 ± 26.54 | 712.17 ± 28.67 |
| Triterpenoid (with olean-12-ene skeleton) | 388.43 ± 44.28 | 292.6 ± 52.05 | 849.1 ± 62.01 |
| Apigenin glycosides (27+28) | 142.23 ± 19.87 | 104.63 ± 29.64 | 364.54 ± 50.05 |
| Spatholosineside A | 20.86 ± 2.33 | 16.67 ± 2.92 | 58.89 ± 4.41 |
aThe results are shown as means ± SE. The statistical analysis was performed using the independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. The criterion used for statistical significance was p < 0.05.
bp < 0.05, Shade versus Oven.
cp < 0.05, Sun versus Oven.
dp < 0.05, Sun versus Shade.
Figure 3The heatmap of the correlation between the different metabolites in Uraria crinita processed with the different drying methods.
(Red–positive correlation, Blue–negative correlation).
Figure 4Multivariate data analysis of the 1H NMR dataset of extracts of Uraria crinita that had been processed by different Oven-drying temperatures at 40 °C and non-40 °C (55 °C and 70 °C).
(A) Scatter plots of the PCA scores of Uraria crinita processed with Oven-drying at 40 °C, 55 °C and 70 °C. (B) Scatter plots of the OPLS-DA scores of Uraria crinita processed with Oven-drying at 40 °C and non-40 °C (55 °C and 70 °C). (C) Coefficient-coded loading plots of the 40 °C and non-40 °C groups.
Normalized integral values of the metabolites from the NMR spectra across the extracts from Uraria crinita that were processed at different oven temperatures.
| Metabolites | Normalized integral value (NMR signal × 103) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Oven 40 | Oven 55 | Oven 70 | |
| Isoleucine | 148.19 ± 16.63 | 105.97 ± 12.37 | 100.92 ± 10.81 |
| Valine | 157.85 ± 18.47 | 130.66 ± 16.65 | 126.38 ± 9.5 |
| Threonine | 428.92 ± 31.18 | 351.81 ± 23.44 | 338.16 ± 22.63 |
| Alanine | 636.11 ± 54.77 | 608.61 ± 41.08 | 561.4 ± 20.17 |
| Arginine | 1109.5 ± 130.58 | 622.57 ± 51.89 | 616.27 ± 33.47 |
| γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) | 273.28 ± 41.93 | 376.12 ± 38.8 | 364.82 ± 13.23 |
| Proline | 275.52 ± 43.73 | 388.99 ± 48.62 | 416.62 ± 29.7 |
| Aspartate | 754.08 ± 149.08 | 316.24 ± 40.12 | 326.04 ± 11.03 |
| Asparagine | 2401.49 ± 239.57 | 2116.24 ± 146.21 | 2060.3 ± 146.78 |
| Tyrosine | 100.84 ± 20.28 | 33.68 ± 4.42 | 30.96 ± 5.81 |
| Tryptophan | 63.45 ± 9.51 | 21.52 ± 5.49 | 18.63 ± 3.89 |
| Phenylalanine | 23.44 ± 5.13 | 11.8 ± 1.5 | 11.88 ± 1.29 |
| Salicylic acid | 80.55 ± 19.42 | 27.54 ± 4.6 | 27.53 ± 3.26 |
| Acetate | 777.83 ± 101.34 | 616.71 ± 53.75 | 699.62 ± 55.02 |
| Formate | 25.45 ± 22.53 | 21.39 ± 2.15 | 24.8 ± 2.45 |
| Glucose | 256.6 ± 39.13 | 138.71 ± 30.61 | 111.79 ± 5.74 |
| Sucrose | 77.90 ± 16.97 | 321.47 ± 9.44 | 356.25 ± 13.33 |
| Pinitol | 3062.8 ± 270.8 | 2879.45 ± 130.16 | 2944.64 ± 106.18 |
| Myo-inositol | 2829.38 ± 99.04 | 3028.6 ± 134.19 | 3119.85 ± 107.15 |
| Adenosine | 9.42 ± 1.81 | 24.31 ± 1.03 | 26.54 ± 2.04 |
| Choline | 779.35 ± 119.08 | 1239.14 ± 61.01 | 1242.67 ± 57.51 |
| Betaine | 953.93 ± 183.39 | 173.46 ± 18.33 | 178.22 ± 28.46 |
| Triterpenoid (with an olean-12-ene skeleton) | 623.31 ± 154.46 | 292.65 ± 52.92 | 275.17 ± 49.51 |
| Apigenin glycosides (27 + 28) | 461.52 ± 97.94 | 189.01 ± 30.75 | 167.04 ± 29.09 |
| Spatholosineside A | 81.99 ± 9.09 | 29.18 ± 4.53 | 27.36 ± 3.97 |
aThe results are shown as means ± SE. The statistical analysis was performed using the independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. The criterion used for statistical significance was p < 0.05.
bp < 0.05, Oven 55 versus Oven 70; cp < 0.05, Oven 40 versus Oven 70; dp < 0.05, Oven 40 versus Oven 55.
Figure 5Scatter plots of the PCA scores of the 1H NMR dataset of extracts of Uraria crinita that had been processed in different batches, by different drying methods, and at different oven temperatures.
Figure 6The bioactivity of the extracts of dried roots of Uraria crinita from different batches that had been processed by different drying methods at different oven temperatures.
(A) The overall screening test; (B) Estrogen receptor-α (ER-alpha); (C) Nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor (Nrf2); (D) COX-2; (E) DPPH; (F) Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assay.
Figure 7The proposed alterations in the metabolic pathway and an outline of some of the metabolites of Uraria crinita that are affected by Oven-drying at 40 °C compared with Sun-drying and Air-drying in the shade.