Literature DB >> 28078944

Rethinking the relationship between socio-economic status and health: Making the case for sociological theory in health inequality research.

Emil Øversveen1, Håvard T Rydland1, Clare Bambra2, Terje A Eikemo1.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study is to analyse previous explanations of social inequality in health and argue for a closer integration of sociological theory into future empirical research.
METHODS: We examine cultural-behavioural, materialist, psychosocial and life-course approaches, in addition to fundamental cause theory. Giddens' structuration theory and a neo-materialist approach, inspired by Bruno Latour, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari, are proposed as ways of rethinking the causal relationship between socio-economic status and health.
CONCLUSIONS: Much of the empirical research on health inequalities has tended to rely on explanations with a static and unidirectional view of the association between socio-economic status and health, assuming a unidirectional causal relationship between largely static categories. We argue for the use of sociological theory to develop more dynamic models that enhance the understanding of the complex pathways and mechanisms linking social structures to health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Social inequalities in health; fundamental cause theory; health inequalities research; medical sociology; neo-materialism; public health research; social determinants; sociological theory; structuration theory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28078944     DOI: 10.1177/1403494816686711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  9 in total

1.  The benefits of a historical-dialectical ontology to critical mental health promotion research.

Authors:  Shari Laliberte; Colleen Varcoe
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.483

2.  Association of Income With the Incidence Rates of First Psychiatric Hospital Admissions in Finland, 1996-2014.

Authors:  Kimmo Suokas; Anna-Maija Koivisto; Christian Hakulinen; Riittakerttu Kaltiala; Reijo Sund; Sonja Lumme; Olli Kampman; Sami Pirkola
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 25.911

3.  Value, transparency, and inclusion: A values-based study of patient involvement in musculoskeletal research.

Authors:  E Bradshaw; K Whale; A Burston; V Wylde; R Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Integrating Sex/Gender into Environmental Health Research: Development of a Conceptual Framework.

Authors:  Gabriele Bolte; Katharina Jacke; Katrin Groth; Ute Kraus; Lisa Dandolo; Lotta Fiedel; Malgorzata Debiak; Marike Kolossa-Gehring; Alexandra Schneider; Kerstin Palm
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  A Theoretical Perspective on Why Socioeconomic Health Inequalities Are Persistent: Building the Case for an Effective Approach.

Authors:  Lisa Wilderink; Ingrid Bakker; Albertine J Schuit; Jacob C Seidell; Ioana A Pop; Carry M Renders
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Alienation: A useful concept for health inequality research.

Authors:  Emil Øversveen; Conor A Kelly
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Nordic research on health inequalities: A scoping review of empirical studies published in Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2000-2021.

Authors:  Jon Ivar Elstad; Kristian Heggebø; Espen Dahl
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Beyond Behaviour: How Health Inequality Theory Can Enhance Our Understanding of the 'Alcohol-Harm Paradox'.

Authors:  Jennifer Boyd; Clare Bambra; Robin C Purshouse; John Holmes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 9.  Innovative technologies and social inequalities in health: A scoping review of the literature.

Authors:  Daniel Weiss; Håvard T Rydland; Emil Øversveen; Magnus Rom Jensen; Solvor Solhaug; Steinar Krokstad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.