Literature DB >> 28078458

Superiority of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with hand-sewn esophagogastrostomy over total gastrectomy in improving postoperative body weight loss and quality of life.

Tatsuto Nishigori1, Hiroshi Okabe2,3, Shigeru Tsunoda1, Hisashi Shinohara1, Kazutaka Obama1, Hisahiro Hosogi1, Shigeo Hisamori1, Kikuko Miyazaki4, Takeo Nakayama4, Yoshiharu Sakai1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Proximal gastrectomy is not widely performed because the procedure is complicated, particularly under laparoscopy. We developed a simple laparoscopic technique of hand-sewn esophagogastrostomy with an anti-reflux mechanism. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the postoperative body weight loss (BWL) and quality of life (QOL) following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) and laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) in patients with upper gastric cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with stage I upper gastric cancer undergoing LPG or LTG at Kyoto University Hospital between March 2006 and June 2014. The main outcome measures were the % BWL 1 year after gastrectomy, postoperative anastomotic stricture, and reflux esophagitis. Additionally, patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the Post-Gastrectomy Syndrome Assessment Scale (PGSAS)-45 in patients presenting at the outpatient clinic and exhibiting no recurrence.
RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were included in this study (LTG, n = 42 vs. LPG, n = 20). The % BWL at 12 months in the LPG group was less than that in the LTG group (-16.3 vs. -10.7%). Multivariate analysis revealed that LPG was associated with less BWL (P = 0.003). Anastomotic stricture occurred more frequently in the LPG group than in the LTG group (0 vs. 25%). One patient in each group exhibited grade B severity of reflux esophagitis (based on the Los Angeles classification). In the questionnaire survey, LPG was better than LTG in terms of diarrhea and dissatisfaction with symptoms. In terms of reflux symptoms, patients in the LPG group experienced less acid and bile regurgitation symptoms compared with those in the LTG group.
CONCLUSIONS: LPG with hand-sewn esophagogastrostomy results in less postoperative BWL and better QOL than LTG despite higher rates of anastomotic stricture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body weight changes; Laparoscopy; Proximal gastrectomy; Quality of life; Stomach neoplasms; Total gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28078458     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5403-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  29 in total

1.  Gastroenterological Surgery: Stomach.

Authors:  Ichiro Uyama; Hiroshi Okabe; Kazuyuki Kojima; Seiji Satoh; Norio Shiraishi; Koichi Suda; Shuji Takiguchi; Eishi Nagai; Tetsu Fukunaga
Journal:  Asian J Endosc Surg       Date:  2015-08

2.  Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3).

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Ahn; Ju Hee Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Characteristics and clinical relevance of postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS)-45: newly developed integrated questionnaires for assessment of living status and quality of life in postgastrectomy patients.

Authors:  Koji Nakada; Masami Ikeda; Masazumi Takahashi; Shinichi Kinami; Masashi Yoshida; Yoshikazu Uenosono; Yoshiyuki Kawashima; Atsushi Oshio; Yoshimi Suzukamo; Masanori Terashima; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Double-Flap Technique as an Antireflux Procedure in Esophagogastrostomy after Proximal Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Shinji Kuroda; Masahiko Nishizaki; Satoru Kikuchi; Kazuhiro Noma; Shunsuke Tanabe; Shunsuke Kagawa; Yasuhiro Shirakawa; Toshiyoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Trends in reported adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus and gastric cardia in Japan.

Authors:  Martin J Blaser; Daizo Saito
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.566

7.  Postoperative changes in body composition after gastrectomy.

Authors:  Teruo Kiyama; Takashi Mizutani; Takeshi Okuda; Itsuro Fujita; Akira Tokunaga; Takashi Tajiri; Adrian Barbul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Quality of life after gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul J Karanicolas; Dennis Graham; Mithat Gönen; Vivian E Strong; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Intracorporeal esophagojejunal anastomosis after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Okabe; Kazutaka Obama; Eiji Tanaka; Akinari Nomura; Jun-ichiro Kawamura; Satoshi Nagayama; Atsushi Itami; Go Watanabe; Seiichiro Kanaya; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Association between Body Mass Index and Health-Related Quality of Life: The "Obesity Paradox" in 21,218 Adults of the Chinese General Population.

Authors:  Yanbo Zhu; Qi Wang; Guoming Pang; Lin Lin; Hideki Origasa; Yangyang Wang; Jie Di; Mai Shi; Chunpok Fan; Huimei Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  25 in total

1.  Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with oblique jejunogastrostomy.

Authors:  Kimitaka Tanaka; Yuma Ebihara; Yo Kurashima; Yoshitsugu Nakanishi; Toshimichi Asano; Takehiro Noji; Soichi Murakami; Toru Nakamura; Takahiro Tsuchikawa; Keisuke Okamura; Toshiaki Shichinohe; Satoshi Hirano
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Surgical and nutritional outcomes of laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toshiro Tanioka; Rawat Waratchanont; Ryosuke Fukuyo; Toshifumi Saito; Yuya Umebayashi; Emi Kanemoto; Kenta Kobayashi; Masatoshi Nakagawa; Mikito Inokuchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of the prognosis of four different surgical strategies for proximal gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ling Tan; Meng-Ni Ran; Zi-Lin Liu; Ling-Han Tang; Zhou Ma; Zhou He; Zhou Xu; Fang-Han Li; Jiang-Wei Xiao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Protocol for Comparing the Efficacy of Three Reconstruction Methods of the Digestive Tract (Kamikawa Versus Double-Tract Reconstruction Versus Tube-Like Stomach) After Proximal Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Wei Dong Wang; Rui Qi Gao; Tong Chen; Dan Hong Dong; Qin Chuan Yang; Hai Kun Zhou; Jiang Peng Wei; Peng Fei Yu; Xi Sheng Yang; Xiao Hua Li; Gang Ji
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-25

5.  Effect of early oral feeding on length of hospital stay following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a Japanese multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Shimizu; Eiji Oki; Yutaka Tanizawa; Yutaka Suzuki; Susumu Aikou; Chikara Kunisaki; Takashi Tsuchiya; Ryoji Fukushima; Yuichiro Doki; Shoji Natsugoe; Yasunori Nishida; Masaru Morita; Naoki Hirabayashi; Fumihiko Hatao; Ikuo Takahashi; Yasuhiro Choda; Yoshiaki Iwasaki; Yasuyuki Seto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Clinical outcomes of gastric tube reconstruction following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: experience with 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Toyomasu; Erito Mochiki; Toru Ishiguro; Tetsuya Ito; Okihide Suzuki; Kyoichi Ogata; Youichi Kumagai; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Hiroshi Saeki; Ken Shirabe; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Quality of Life After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: Survey Metrics and Implications of Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Yinin Hu; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Analysis of factors contributing to postoperative body weight change in patients with gastric cancer: based on generalized estimation equation.

Authors:  Qiuju Tian; Liyuan Qin; Weiyi Zhu; Shaojie Xiong; Beiwen Wu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Impact of body mass index on quality of life after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ki Bum Park; Byunghyuk Yu; Ji Yeon Park; Oh Kyoung Kwon; Wansik Yu
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 1.859

10.  Development and Validation of a Symptom-Focused Quality of Life Questionnaire (KOQUSS-40) for Gastric Cancer Patients after Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Bang Wool Eom; Joongyub Lee; In Seob Lee; Young-Gil Son; Keun Won Ryu; Sung Geun Kim; Hyoung-Il Kim; Young-Woo Kim; Seong-Ho Kong; Oh Kyoung Kwon; Ji-Ho Park; Ji Yeong An; Chang Hyun Kim; Byoung-Jo Suh; Hong Man Yoon; Myoung Won Son; Ji Yeon Park; Jong-Min Park; Sang-Ho Jeong; Moon-Won Yoo; Geum Jong Song; Han-Kwang Yang; Yun-Suhk Suh; Ki Bum Park; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Dong Woo Shin; Ye Seob Jee; Hye-Seong Ahn; Sol Lee; Jae Seok Min; Haejin In; Ahyoung Kim; Hoon Hur; Hyuk-Joon Lee
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.