Literature DB >> 28078060

Natural Killer Cell Subsets and IL-2, IL-15, and IL-18 Genes Expressions in Chronic Kidney Allograft Dysfunction and Graft Function in Kidney Allograft Recipients.

S Assadiasl1, A Sepanjnia1, B Aghili1, M Nafar2, P Ahmadpoor2, F Pourrezagholi2, M Parvin3, A Shahlaee4, M H Nicknam5, A Amirzargar5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While acute rejection and early graft loss rates have decreased substantially over the past four decades, progressive chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) still remains a common cause of late graft loss in kidney transplant recipients.
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to investigate the percentage of natural killer (NK) cell subsets and IL-2, 15 and 18 genes expression in two groups of CAD and well-function graft (WFG) recipients.
METHODS: 30 renal allograft recipients with biopsy-proven interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and impaired renal function, and 30 sex- and age-matched WFG patients were enrolled in this study. The percentage of NK cell subsets including NK CD56bright and NK CD56dim cells were determined by flowcytometry; IL-2, IL-15, and IL-18 genes expressions were assessed by real-time PCR.
RESULTS: Compared to WFG patients, there was a significant (p<0.05) increase in the percentage of NK CD56bright cells in CAD patients. However, the difference in percentage of NK CD56dim cells or CD56dim/CD56bright ratio between the studied groups was not significant. In addition, IL-2, 15 and 18 genes expressions were almost similar in CAD and WFG patients.
CONCLUSION: We found higher percentages of NK CD56bright subset in kidney transplant recipients with CAD without considerable changes in related cytokines' gene expression, suggesting a possible defect of NK cells maturation in these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic allograft dysfunction; Interleukin gene expression; Natural killer cells

Year:  2016        PMID: 28078060      PMCID: PMC5219582     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Organ Transplant Med        ISSN: 2008-6482


INTRODUCTION

Kidney allograft transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal diseases. Both antigen-dependent (e.g., HLA mismatch) and antigen-independent risk factors (e.g., ischemia reperfusion injury [IRI]) can result in inflammation, tissue damage, and initiation of graft failure [1]. Many studies in the context of solid organ transplantation suggest a considerable role for innate immunity, particularly natural killer (NK) cells and related cytokines, in allograft damages. However, the exact mechanisms have not yet been fully understood [2]. NK cells phenotypically express CD16 and CD56 in the absence of TCR/CD3 complex. Considering the amount of CD56 expression, NK cells are classified as CD56bright and CD56dim cells, but the expression of CD56 is not steady and changes during different stages of maturation. Mature NK cells express NKG2D, low levels of CD56, and high levels of surface CD16. While around 90% of human peripheral blood NK cells are CD56dim and regarded as the classical cytotoxic NK cell subset, the remaining 10%, the so-called CD56bright subset, display low cytotoxic capacity and produce high levels of IFNγ and TNFα [3]. NKCD56dim cells produce cytolytic molecules, like perforin, granzyme, and granulyzin, to eliminate unfamiliar allograft cells [4]. But, recent studies have shown presence of regulatory NK cell subsets in stable grafts, indicating a unique role for NK cells in maintenance of homeostasis, introducing them as active participants in rejection or acceptance of transplanted organs [5]. NK cells effect on dendritic cells maturation and activation has been investigated in some studies [6, 7]. For instance, it has been shown that early events following kidney transplantation involving NK-DC interaction via KIR-HLA-C immune synapse and NK cells cytolytic activity against donor-derived APCs influence the transplant outcome [8]. Tissue biopsy is the gold-standard diagnostic test for determining chronic allograft damages, but its invasiveness and consequential side effects limit its feasibility in clinic. Therefore, there is a growing tendency to replace biopsy with a battery of tests for biomarkers in peripheral blood and urine. A combination of NK cells percentages and ratio might be an eligible candidate for the new test [9]. In addition, manipulating the number and activity of NK cell subsets to find new immunomodulatory strategies seems to be helpful. In this study we investigated NK CD3neg CD16dim CD56bright and CD3neg CD16bright CD56dim subsets among two groups of patients—a group with chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) with biopsy-proven interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA), and another group of recipients with stable graft function (WFG) in order to find any correlations between clinical status and NK cells counts and ratio in their peripheral blood.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients Sixty adult renal transplant recipients, who had received kidney allograft between six months and five years prior to our study, were enrolled in this study. They included 30 patients with biopsy-proven CAD and 30 patients with clinically well-function graft (WFG). The patients with CAD (n=30) had had a progressive deterioration in their allograft function with 15% or more irreversible rise in creatinine within 1–3 months and proteinuria >1 g/24 h [9]. Consequently, they were biopsied where the pathologic lesions (IF/TA) were reported in all of them [10, 11]. Those with WFG (n=30) were selected according to their sex, age and time post-transplantation in order to be pair-matched with CAD patients. They were normal in clinical examination and their serum creatinine levels were ≤1 mg/dL, they had proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h and their Cockcroft creatinine clearance was >80 mL/min [9]. They had no registered history of acute rejection episodes. Since these patients presented no deterioration in their graft function, and protocol biopsies are not routine in our centers, no biopsy was taken for this group. None of the enrolled patients had diagnosed with infectious diseases at the sampling time. The protocol conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences. All patients gave written informed consent prior to the inclusion in our study. Flowcytometry For staining of CD3neg CD16dim CD56bright and CD3neg CD16bright CD56dim NK cells, we used FITC anti-human CD16, APC anti-human CD56, and PE anti-human CD3 (eBioscience, San Diego, USA). FITC conjugate mouse IgG1, mouse IgG1 isotype control PE, and mouse IgG1 isotype control APC (eBioscience, San Diego, USA) were also used as isotype negative controls. Flowcytometry was performed by FACSCalibur (BD FacsCalibur Becton Dickinson, USA) instrument and data were analyzed by CellQuest Pro software. RNA Isolation and Real-Time PCR RNAs were isolated from PBMC using high pure RNA isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instruction. RNA quality was assessed by NanoDrop1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and samples with A260/A280 ratio of 1.8–2.2, and A260/A230 ratio of 2–2.2 were considered “acceptable.” RNA samples reverse transcription to cDNA was performed by transcriptor first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). cDNA quality was also evaluated by NanoDrop1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and samples with A260/A280 ratio of 1.7–2 were stored at 70 °C until use. Gene expression assay was performed by real-time PCR using TaqManprobs and specific primers supplied by ABI (ABI, Applied BiosystemStepOnePlus). The endogenous control was housekeeping gene, β-actin. Relative gene expression was calculated by standard curve method using ∆∆Ct value for each amplified patient sample and cDNA from a healthy control. Data were analyzed by Applied BiosystemStepOne software v2.1 [12]. Statistical Analysis Data were presented as mean±SD. Comparison between groups was performed by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and one-way ANOVA tests. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Demographic and basic characteristics of studied groups are shown in Table 1. Regarding the percentage of NK cell subsets in lymphocyte population, CAD group presenting higher percentages of NK CD56bright cells compared to the WFG recipients (p<0.05). However, no difference was observed in NK CD56dim cells frequency or CD56dim/CD56bright ratio between the two groups (Table 2).
Table 1

Patients’ demographics and clinical data: patients with chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) and patients with well-function graft (WFG)

ParameterGroup
CAD (n=30)WFG (n=30)
Mean±SD age in (yrs)39.4±13.339.1±12.3
Male:Female19:1119:11
Cadaver/living donor15:1517:13
Mean±SD Cockcroft creatinine clearance (mL/min)34.4±13.196.3±14.1
Mean±SD time post-transplantation (months)41.0±17.841.0±17.8
IS protocol:*
CsA, MMF, Steroids 22 (73%)26 (87%)
Tac, Aza, Steroids 5 (17%) 3 (10%)
Rapa, MMF, Steroids 3 (10%) 1 (3%)

IS: immunosuppressive, Aza: azathioprine, CsA: cyclosporine-A, MMF: mycophenolate mofetil, Tac: tacrolimus

Table 2

Frequency of NK CD56dim and NK CD56bright cells in CAD and WFG recipients

CAD (n=30)WFG (n=30)p value
NK56dim (%)7.7±3.47.0±3.80.375
NK56bright (%)1.3±1.80.9±1.50.039
NK56dim/NK56bright15.0±15.818.5±31.40.508
Patients’ demographics and clinical data: patients with chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) and patients with well-function graft (WFG) IS: immunosuppressive, Aza: azathioprine, CsA: cyclosporine-A, MMF: mycophenolate mofetil, Tac: tacrolimus Frequency of NK CD56dim and NK CD56bright cells in CAD and WFG recipients Frequency of NK CD56dim and NK CD56bright cells and NK CD56dim/NK CD56bright ratio were also evaluated in CAD patients with different pathological grades of IF/TA. Despite a mild decrease in NK CD56dim cell percentage and a subtle rise of NK CD56bright among recipients with advanced pathology, there was no significant difference between CAD patients with different grades of IF/TA (Table 3).
Table 3

Frequency of NK CD56dim and NK CD56bright cells in different grades of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy

Grade I (n=8)Grade II (n=16)Grade III (n=6)p value
NK56dim (%)8.2±3.07.8±4.06.8±2.40.223
NK56bright (%)0.6±0.51.8±2.31.2±0.90.280
NK56dim/NK56bright20.8±16.211.9±14.216.3±19.80.678
Frequency of NK CD56dim and NK CD56bright cells in different grades of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy Comparison of IL-2, IL-15, and IL-18 genes expression between the studied groups showed no significant variation between patients with CAD and WFG (Table 4).
Table 4

Gene expression of interleukins 2, 15, and 18 in CAD and WFG patients

CAD (n=30)WFG (n=30)p value
IL-20.04±0.140.13±0.300.163
IL-1534.4±97.305.81±17.710.506
IL-186.46±12.852.67±3.000.871
Gene expression of interleukins 2, 15, and 18 in CAD and WFG patients According to the inclusion criteria set, none of patients had infectious diseases at time of sampling. However, a number of patients had past medical history of CMV positivity (IgM and IgG antibody to CMV). Therefore, the correlation between CMV positivity history and NK cells subsets frequency was evaluated in these patients. NK CD56dim cells level was significantly higher among WFG patients with history of CMV positivity compared with CMV-negative patients (p=0.025) (Table 5).
Table 5

Frequency of NK CD56dim and NK CD56bright cells in CAD and WFG groups according to CMV antigen positivity

CAD (n=30)
WFG (n=30)
CMV(n=20)CMV+ (n=10)p valueCMV(n=23)CMV+ (n=7)p value
NK56dim (%)8.26±3.536.66±3.080.1096.21±3.889.67±2.230.025
NK56bright (%)1.27±1.651.52±2.200.7130.90±1.620.79±0.840.783
NKdim/NKbright18.08±18.269.04±7.000.54219.63±35.9915.10±11.430.266
Frequency of NK CD56dim and NK CD56bright cells in CAD and WFG groups according to CMV antigen positivity No significant difference was observed in NK CD56dim and NK CD56bright cell percentages among renal allograft recipients receiving different immunosuppressive regimes including cyclosporine (Sandimmune), tacrolimus, and rapamycin.

DISCUSSION

NK cells, an important part of innate immunity, play a critical role in host defense against intracellular microorganisms and tumor cells by exerting cytotoxic activity and producing cytokines like INF-γ [13]. The NK cells controversial role in transplantation has been also considered in order to find a way to modulate their various activities for reaching better allograft survival [14]. Some of well-known disadvantages of presence of NK cells in allograft are killing donor cells according to the “missing self” theory [1], activating T cells via INF-γ secretion and OX40-OX40L interaction [15, 16], contribution to antibody-mediated injuries by antibody-dependent cytotoxicity (ADCC) mechanism [17], and predisposing endothelial damage because of MICA recognition by NKG2D on NK cells, which results in enhanced cytotoxicity [18, 19]. On the other hand, there are studies in favor of NK cells positive effects on allograft. For instance, Laffont, et al, showed that NK cells can prevent T cells direct activation by killing donor APCs [20]. Rabinovich, et al, showed perforin-mediated killing of T cells by NK cells [21]. Recent studies also indicate involvement of these cells in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell regulation [22, 23]. The role of NK cells in inducing chronic allograft vasculopathy has also been shown in a study [24]. Furthermore, new findings suggest therapeutic modalities that interfere with NK cells function in order to selectively modulate their cytolytic activity against donor APCs and help inducing tolerance, especially in highly immunogenic transplants [6]. In the present study, we investigated NK cell subsets in two sex- and age-matched groups of renal allograft recipients with different transplantation outcomes within similar post-transplantation intervals. Regarding the two major peripheral NK cell subsets, the CD56bright NK cell subset was found to be significantly increased in CAD patients in comparison with WFG patients. However, there was a similar percentage of NK CD56dim in studied groups. Although this finding can be partially explained by the effect of immunosuppressive drugs on development of NK cells, other probable underlying causes have to be investigated. We also analyzed NK CD56dim/NK CD56bright cells ratio, and found that it was also similar in WFG and CAD recipients. We could not find any association between advanced and mild pathological grades of IF/TA and NK subsets percentage. There are evidence for the effect of various cytokines on NK cell maturation and activation; for example, IL-2 helps NK CDbright cells to produce INF-γ [25], and IL-1, IL-2, IL-12, IL-15 and IL-18 contribute to NK CDdim cells cytolytic activity [26, 27]. IL-2 and IL-12 cytokines genes polymorphism have been investigated in various immunologic disorders [28, 29]. Therefore, we evaluated gene expression of a cytokine profile to find any differences between WFG recipients and patients with CAD. Nevertheless, IL-2, IL-15, and IL-18 genes represented similar ranges of expression in these groups. There are also studies indicating inhibitory effect of cyclosporine-A on NK cells global activation [30]. Some researchers showed that cyclosporine-A reduces the number of NK CD56dim cells and causes a significant increase in NK CD56bright subset frequency [31, 32]. However, considering prior evidence about this issue, we did not find any significant correlation between immunosuppressive regimens and peripheral NK cell repertoire of kidney transplant recipients, probably because of low study power. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated a significant increase in NK CD56bright cells among CAD patients with biopsy-proven IF/TA lesions without considerable alteration in related cytokines gene expression in comparison with WFG recipients, suggesting a possible defect in NK cell maturation in these patients. Nonetheless, larger detailed studies are required to further assess the function and relevance of NK cells in renal transplantation long-term outcomes.
  31 in total

1.  The unexpected effect of cyclosporin A on CD56+CD16- and CD56+CD16+ natural killer cell subpopulations.

Authors:  Hongbo Wang; Bartosz Grzywacz; David Sukovich; Valarie McCullar; Qing Cao; Alisa B Lee; Bruce R Blazar; David N Cornfield; Jeffrey S Miller; Michael R Verneris
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  NK cells: elusive participants in transplantation immunity and tolerance.

Authors:  Ronald G Gill
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 7.486

3.  NK cell patrolling and elimination of donor-derived dendritic cells favor indirect alloreactivity.

Authors:  Kym R Garrod; Feng-Chun Liu; Luette E Forrest; Ian Parker; Sang-Mo Kang; Michael D Cahalan
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy.

Authors:  Brian J Nankivell; Richard J Borrows; Caroline L-S Fung; Philip J O'Connell; Richard D M Allen; Jeremy R Chapman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Renal transplant immunosuppression impairs natural killer cell function in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Olivier Morteau; Samkeliso Blundell; Aron Chakera; Sophia Bennett; Charita M Christou; Philip D Mason; Richard J Cornall; Christopher A O'Callaghan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Natural killer cell activity in renal transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine.

Authors:  X E Gui; C R Rinaldo; M Ho
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Banff 2013 meeting report: inclusion of c4d-negative antibody-mediated rejection and antibody-associated arterial lesions.

Authors:  M Haas; B Sis; L C Racusen; K Solez; D Glotz; R B Colvin; M C R Castro; D S R David; E David-Neto; S M Bagnasco; L C Cendales; L D Cornell; A J Demetris; C B Drachenberg; C F Farver; A B Farris; I W Gibson; E Kraus; H Liapis; A Loupy; V Nickeleit; P Randhawa; E R Rodriguez; D Rush; R N Smith; C D Tan; W D Wallace; M Mengel
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  NK cells promote transplant tolerance by killing donor antigen-presenting cells.

Authors:  Guang Yu; Xuemin Xu; Minh Diem Vu; Elizabeth D Kilpatrick; Xian Chang Li
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  The Peripheral NK Cell Repertoire after Kidney Transplantation is Modulated by Different Immunosuppressive Drugs.

Authors:  Christine Neudoerfl; Bernadett J Mueller; Cornelia Blume; Kerstin Daemen; Maja Stevanovic-Meyer; Jana Keil; Frank Lehner; Hermann Haller; Christine S Falk
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  KIR and HLA-C interactions promote differential dendritic cell maturation and is a major determinant of graft failure following kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Raj Hanvesakul; Chandrashekhar Kubal; Jason Moore; Desley Neil; Mark Cook; Simon Ball; David Briggs; Paul Moss; Paul Cockwell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Immune monitoring as prerequisite for transplantation tolerance trials.

Authors:  K Behnam Sani; B Sawitzki
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Decreased NK cell immunity in kidney transplant recipients late post-transplant and increased NK-cell immunity in patients with recurrent miscarriage.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Mostafa Aly; Haihao Wang; Hristos Karakizlis; Rolf Weimer; Christian Morath; Ruben Jeremias Kuon; Bettina Toth; Gerhard Opelz; Volker Daniel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.