Helena H Laroche1, Christine Hradek2, Kate Hansen3, Andrew S Hanks4, David R Just5, Brian Wansink5. 1. Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242. 2. EFNEP and SNAP-Ed, Human Sciences Extension and Outreach, Iowa State University, 104 MacKay Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1122. 3. Community Partner-Muskie Booster, Muscatine, IA 52761. 4. Consumer Analytics and Behavior, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210-1295. 5. Charles H. Dyson School of Applied Economics & Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A previous sales data analysis demonstrated success in selling healthier items at a concession stand. Questions remained regarding student satisfaction and whether the intervention reached non-health-conscious students. METHODS: Cross-sectional anonymous samples of students at a large midwestern high school were surveyed before and after an intervention improved the number of healthier items available at the concession stand. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 301 students preintervention and 314 students postintervention. Satisfaction remained good (3.7 preintervention and 3.6 postintervention). Satisfaction with the variety and taste of foods increased. We compared students who felt having healthy items were important at the concessions to those who did not. Overall satisfaction with concessions did not differ between groups. The latter group (healthy items not important) reported improved satisfaction with food variety (2.8 to 3.1, p = .02) and the former reported improved satisfaction with healthy foods (2.5 to 2.9, p = .03) and overall taste (3.2 to 3.4, p = .02). Of the healthy items not important students 76% reported purchasing at least 1 new healthier food. CONCLUSIONS: Adding healthier foods to school concession stands has positive effects on student satisfaction, sales, and reaches all students whether or not they care about having healthy items available.
BACKGROUND: A previous sales data analysis demonstrated success in selling healthier items at a concession stand. Questions remained regarding student satisfaction and whether the intervention reached non-health-conscious students. METHODS: Cross-sectional anonymous samples of students at a large midwestern high school were surveyed before and after an intervention improved the number of healthier items available at the concession stand. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 301 students preintervention and 314 students postintervention. Satisfaction remained good (3.7 preintervention and 3.6 postintervention). Satisfaction with the variety and taste of foods increased. We compared students who felt having healthy items were important at the concessions to those who did not. Overall satisfaction with concessions did not differ between groups. The latter group (healthy items not important) reported improved satisfaction with food variety (2.8 to 3.1, p = .02) and the former reported improved satisfaction with healthy foods (2.5 to 2.9, p = .03) and overall taste (3.2 to 3.4, p = .02). Of the healthy items not important students 76% reported purchasing at least 1 new healthier food. CONCLUSIONS: Adding healthier foods to school concession stands has positive effects on student satisfaction, sales, and reaches all students whether or not they care about having healthy items available.
Keywords:
adolescence; community health promotion and child health; community-based participatory research; concession stand; diet; school-based health promotion
Authors: Helena H Laroche; Christopher Ford; Kate Hansen; Xueya Cai; David R Just; Andrew S Hanks; Brian Wansink Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Daniel R Taber; June Stevens; Kelly R Evenson; Dianne S Ward; Charles Poole; Matthew L Maciejewski; David M Murray; Ross C Brownson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-07-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jennifer F Lucarelli; Katherine Alaimo; Ellen Mang; Caroline Martin; Richard Miles; Deborah Bailey; Deanne K Kelleher; Nicholas B Drzal; Hui Liu Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.118