Literature DB >> 28076866

Biophysically Motivated Regulatory Network Inference: Progress and Prospects.

Tarmo Äijö1, Richard Bonneau.   

Abstract

Thanks to the confluence of genomic technology and computational developments, the possibility of network inference methods that automatically learn large comprehensive models of cellular regulation is closer than ever. This perspective focuses on enumerating the elements of computational strategies that, when coupled to appropriate experimental designs, can lead to accurate large-scale models of chromatin state and transcriptional regulatory structure and dynamics. We highlight 4 research questions that require further investigation in order to make progress in network inference: (1) using overall constraints on network structure such as sparsity, (2) use of informative priors and data integration to constrain individual model parameters, (3) estimation of latent regulatory factor activity under varying cell conditions, and (4) new methods for learning and modeling regulatory factor interactions. We conclude that methods combining advances in these 4 categories of required effort with new genomic technologies will result in biophysically motivated dynamic genome-wide regulatory network models for several of the best-studied organisms and cell types.
© 2017 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28076866     DOI: 10.1159/000446614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  9 in total

Review 1.  How to deal with parameters for whole-cell modelling.

Authors:  Ann C Babtie; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  High-Dimensional Bayesian Network Inference From Systems Genetics Data Using Genetic Node Ordering.

Authors:  Lingfei Wang; Pieter Audenaert; Tom Michoel
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  IncGraph: Incremental graphlet counting for topology optimisation.

Authors:  Robrecht Cannoodt; Joeri Ruyssinck; Jan Ramon; Katleen De Preter; Yvan Saeys
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Parameter uncertainty quantification using surrogate models applied to a spatial model of yeast mating polarization.

Authors:  Marissa Renardy; Tau-Mu Yi; Dongbin Xiu; Ching-Shan Chou
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Leveraging chromatin accessibility for transcriptional regulatory network inference in T Helper 17 Cells.

Authors:  Emily R Miraldi; Maria Pokrovskii; Aaron Watters; Dayanne M Castro; Nicholas De Veaux; Jason A Hall; June-Yong Lee; Maria Ciofani; Aviv Madar; Nick Carriero; Dan R Littman; Richard Bonneau
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Condition-Specific Modeling of Biophysical Parameters Advances Inference of Regulatory Networks.

Authors:  Konstantine Tchourine; Christine Vogel; Richard Bonneau
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Parametric and non-parametric gradient matching for network inference: a comparison.

Authors:  Leander Dony; Fei He; Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Stochastic simulation and statistical inference platform for visualization and estimation of transcriptional kinetics.

Authors:  Gennady Gorin; Mengyu Wang; Ido Golding; Heng Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multi-model and network inference based on ensemble estimates: avoiding the madness of crowds.

Authors:  Michael P H Stumpf
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.118

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.