Literature DB >> 28075228

Impacts of a population-based prostate cancer screening programme on excess total mortality rates in men with prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

Pim J van Leeuwen1, Ries Kranse2, Timo Hakulinen3, Jonas Hugosson4, Teuvo L Tammela5, Stefano Ciatto6, Monique J Roobol7, Marco Zappa8, Harry J de Koning9, Chris H Bangma10, Sue M Moss11, Anssi Auvinen12, Fritz H Schröder10.   

Abstract

Objectives To assess the effect of screening in terms of excess mortality in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Methods A total of 141,578 men aged 55-69 were randomized to systematic screening or usual care in ERSPC sections in Finland, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden. The excess number of deaths was defined as the difference between the observed number of deaths in the prostate cancer (PC) patients and the expected number of deaths up to 31 December 2006. The expected number was derived from mortality of all study participants before a diagnosis with PC adjusted for study centre, study arm and study attendance. The excess mortality rates were compared between the two study arms. Results The PC incidence was 9.25 per 1000 person-years in the intervention arm and 5.49 per 1000 person-years in the control arm, relative risk (RR) 1.69 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-1.76). The excess mortality among men with PC was 0.29 per 1000 person-years in the intervention arm and 0.37 per 1000 person-years in the control arm; the RR for excess mortality was 0.77 (95% CI 0.55-1.08). The absolute risk reduction in the excess mortality was 0.08 per 1000 person-years. The overall mortality was not significantly different between the intervention and the control arms of the study: RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.96-1.01). Conclusions Although the reduction in excess mortality was not statistically significant, the between-arm reduction in excess mortality rate was in line with the previously reported 20% reduction in the disease-specific mortality. This finding indicates that the reduction in PC mortality in the ERSPC trial cannot be due to a bias in cause of death adjudication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 28075228     DOI: 10.1258/jms.2013.012026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  2 in total

1.  A different method of evaluation of the ERSPC trial confirms that prostate-specific antigen testing has a significant impact on prostate cancer mortality.

Authors:  Marco Zappa; Donella Puliti; Jonas Hugosson; Fritz H Schröder; Pim J van Leeuwen; Ries Kranse; Anssi Auvinen; Sigrid Carlsson; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Vera Nelen; Alvaro Paez Borda; Monique J Roobol; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  PSA Testing Use and Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Stage After the 2012 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guideline Changes.

Authors:  Christopher J Magnani; Kevin Li; Tina Seto; Kathryn M McDonald; Douglas W Blayney; James D Brooks; Tina Hernandez-Boussard
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.