Literature DB >> 28074003

DNA Polymerase Beta Germline Variant Confers Cellular Response to Cisplatin Therapy.

Antonia A Nemec1,2, Laura Abriola3, Jane S Merkel3, Elisa de Stanchina4, Michelle DeVeaux5, Daniel Zelterman5, Peter M Glazer6,2, Joann B Sweasy1,2.   

Abstract

Resistance to cancer chemotherapies leads to deadly consequences, yet current research focuses only on the roles of somatically acquired mutations in this resistance. The mutational status of the germline is also likely to play a role in the way cells respond to chemotherapy. The carrier status for the POLB rs3136797 germline mutation encoding P242R DNA polymerase beta (Pol β) is associated with poor prognosis for lung cancer, specifically in response to treatment with cisplatin. Here, it is revealed that the P242R mutation is sufficient to promote resistance to cisplatin in human cells and in mouse xenografts. Mechanistically, P242R Pol β acts as a translesion polymerase and prefers to insert the correct nucleotide opposite cisplatin intrastrand cross-links, leading to the activation of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, removal of crosslinks, and resistance to cisplatin. In contrast, wild-type (WT) Pol β preferentially inserts the incorrect nucleotide initiating mismatch repair and cell death. Importantly, in a mouse xenograft model, tumors derived from lung cancer cells expressing WT Pol β displayed a slower rate of growth when treated with cisplatin, whereas tumors expressing P242R Pol β had no response to cisplatin. Pol β is critical for mediating crosstalk in response to cisplatin. The current data strongly suggest that the status of Pol β influences cellular responses to crosslinking agents and that Pol β is a promising biomarker to predict responses to specific chemotherapies. Finally, these results highlight that the genetic status of the germline is a critical factor in the response to cancer treatment.Implications: Pol β has prognostic biomarker potential in the treatment of cancer with cisplatin and perhaps other intrastrand crosslinking agents. Mol Cancer Res; 15(3); 269-80. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28074003      PMCID: PMC5334281          DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-16-0227-T

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cancer Res        ISSN: 1541-7786            Impact factor:   5.852


  42 in total

1.  Efficiency of extension of mismatched primer termini across from cisplatin and oxaliplatin adducts by human DNA polymerases beta and eta in vitro.

Authors:  Ekaterina Bassett; Alexandra Vaisman; Jody M Havener; Chikahide Masutani; Fumio Hanaoka; Stephen G Chaney
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  Repair and genetic consequences of endogenous DNA base damage in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Deborah E Barnes; Tomas Lindahl
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Interrogation of nucleotide excision repair capacity: impact on platinum-based cancer therapy.

Authors:  Jennifer N Earley; John J Turchi
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  Overexpression of DNA polymerase beta in cell results in a mutator phenotype and a decreased sensitivity to anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Y Canitrot; C Cazaux; M Fréchet; K Bouayadi; C Lesca; B Salles; J S Hoffmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The E295K DNA polymerase beta gastric cancer-associated variant interferes with base excision repair and induces cellular transformation.

Authors:  Tieming Lang; Shibani Dalal; Anna Chikova; Daniel DiMaio; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Population-specific variation in haplotype composition and heterozygosity at the POLB locus.

Authors:  Jennifer Yamtich; William C Speed; Eva Straka; Judith R Kidd; Joann B Sweasy; Kenneth K Kidd
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-01-23

7.  Colon cancer-associated DNA polymerase β variant induces genomic instability and cellular transformation.

Authors:  Antonia A Nemec; Katherine A Donigan; Drew L Murphy; Joachim Jaeger; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Hinge residue I174 is critical for proper dNTP selection by DNA polymerase beta.

Authors:  Jen Yamtich; Daniela Starcevic; Julia Lauper; Elenoe Smith; Idina Shi; Sneha Rangarajan; Joachim Jaeger; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 9.  The DNA damage response and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The Leu22Pro tumor-associated variant of DNA polymerase beta is dRP lyase deficient.

Authors:  Shibani Dalal; Anna Chikova; Joachim Jaeger; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  9 in total

1.  I260Q DNA polymerase β highlights precatalytic conformational rearrangements critical for fidelity.

Authors:  Cary Liptak; Mariam M Mahmoud; Brian E Eckenroth; Marcus V Moreno; Kyle East; Khadijeh S Alnajjar; Ji Huang; Jamie B Towle-Weicksel; Sylvie Doublié; J Patrick Loria; Joann B Sweasy
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The correlation of BER protein, IRF3 with CD8+ T cell and their prognostic significance in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Lin-Ang Wang; Bo Yang; Wen Rao; Hualiang Xiao; Dong Wang; Jun Jiang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Two polymorphic mutations in promoter region of DNA polymerase β in relatively higher percentage of thymic hyperplasia patients.

Authors:  Qingjun Wu; Shan Zhou; Jian Liu; Hongfeng Tong; Yaoguang Sun; Wenxin Tian; Hanbo Yu; Chuan Huang; Donghang Li; Peng Jiao; Chao Ma; Jianping Cai; Dapeng Dai
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 4.  The Role of Natural Polymorphic Variants of DNA Polymerase β in DNA Repair.

Authors:  Olga A Kladova; Olga S Fedorova; Nikita A Kuznetsov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Polymorphic mutations in the polb gene promoter and their impact on transcriptional activity.

Authors:  Qingjun Wu; Yuying Qi; Shuanghu Wang; Jian Liu; Peiwu Geng; Quan Zhou; Wenqian Zhang; Jianping Cai; Bin Hu; Dapeng Dai; Hui Li
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-02-06       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Identification of a DNA damage repair gene-related signature for lung squamous cell carcinoma prognosis.

Authors:  Bin Jia; Ting Gong; Bingsheng Sun; Zhenfa Zhang; Diansheng Zhong; Changli Wang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.223

7.  Nucleotide Excision Repair Factor XPC Ameliorates Prognosis by Increasing the Susceptibility of Human Colorectal Cancer to Chemotherapy and Ionizing Radiation.

Authors:  Liang-Bo Hu; Yin Chen; Xiao-Dong Meng; Pan Yu; Xu He; Jie Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Base Excision Repair in the Immune System: Small DNA Lesions With Big Consequences.

Authors:  Maria Stratigopoulou; Tijmen P van Dam; Jeroen E J Guikema
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Analysis of DNA Polymerases Reveals Specific Genes Expansion in Leishmania and Trypanosoma spp.

Authors:  Ana Poveda; Miguel Ángel Méndez; Vinicio Armijos-Jaramillo
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 5.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.