BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is a promising option for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients at risk of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD). However, its effectiveness in terminating ventricular arrhythmias in HCM is yet unresolved. METHODS: Consecutive HCM patients referred for S-ICD implantation were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent one or two attempts of VF induction by the programmer. Successful conversion was defined as any 65J shock that terminated VF (not requiring rescue shocks). Clinical and instrumental parameters were analyzed to study predictors of conversion failure. RESULTS: Fifty HCM patients (34 males, 40±16years) with a mean BMI of 25.2±4.4kg/m2 were evaluated. Mean ESC SCD risk of was 6.5±3.9% and maximal LV wall thickness (LVMWT) was 26±6mm. In 2/50 patients no arrhythmias were inducible, while in 7 (14%) only sustained ventricular tachycardia was induced and cardioverted. In the remaining 41 (82%) patients, 73 VF episodes were induced (1 episode in 14 and >1 in 27 patients). Of these, 4 (6%) spontaneously converted. In 68/69 (98%) the S-ICD successfully cardioverted, but failed in 1 (2%) patient, who needed rescue defibrillation. This patient was severely obese (BMI 36) and LVMWT of 25mm. VF was re-induced and successfully converted by the 80J reversed polarity S-ICD. CONCLUSIONS: Acute DT at 65J at the implant showed the effectiveness of S-ICD in the recognition and termination of VT/VF in all HCM patients except one. Extreme LVH did not affect the performance of the device, whereas severe obesity was likely responsible for the single 65J failure.
BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is a promising option for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients at risk of Sudden Cardiac Death (SCD). However, its effectiveness in terminating ventricular arrhythmias in HCM is yet unresolved. METHODS: Consecutive HCM patients referred for S-ICD implantation were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent one or two attempts of VF induction by the programmer. Successful conversion was defined as any 65J shock that terminated VF (not requiring rescue shocks). Clinical and instrumental parameters were analyzed to study predictors of conversion failure. RESULTS: Fifty HCM patients (34 males, 40±16years) with a mean BMI of 25.2±4.4kg/m2 were evaluated. Mean ESC SCD risk of was 6.5±3.9% and maximal LV wall thickness (LVMWT) was 26±6mm. In 2/50 patients no arrhythmias were inducible, while in 7 (14%) only sustained ventricular tachycardia was induced and cardioverted. In the remaining 41 (82%) patients, 73 VF episodes were induced (1 episode in 14 and >1 in 27 patients). Of these, 4 (6%) spontaneously converted. In 68/69 (98%) the S-ICD successfully cardioverted, but failed in 1 (2%) patient, who needed rescue defibrillation. This patient was severely obese (BMI 36) and LVMWT of 25mm. VF was re-induced and successfully converted by the 80J reversed polarity S-ICD. CONCLUSIONS: Acute DT at 65J at the implant showed the effectiveness of S-ICD in the recognition and termination of VT/VF in all HCM patients except one. Extreme LVH did not affect the performance of the device, whereas severe obesity was likely responsible for the single 65J failure.