Jasmin Jensen1, Cindy Weng2, Holly L Spraker-Perlman3. 1. 1 Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children , Honolulu, Hawaii. 2. 2 Study Design and Biostatistics Center, School of Medicine, University of Utah , Salt Lake City, Utah. 3. 3 Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of Utah , Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bereavement support is a core tenet of palliative care that may prove difficult for clinicians as it is time-consuming, emotionally charged, and not emphasized in pediatrics training. This project is intended to describe the opinions, knowledge, and practice of bereavement care among pediatric oncologists to identify gaps in clinical care. PROCEDURES: An internet-based survey instrument was pilot tested, refined, and distributed to pediatric oncologists in the United States. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.2. RESULTS: Electronic surveys were distributed to 2,061 pediatric oncologists and 522 surveys (25%) were fully completed. Participants were asked how likely they are to engage in particular bereavement activities (phone calls, condolence cards, memorial services, family meetings, or referrals for counseling) following the death of a pediatric cancer patient. Eighty-two percent of participants, at least, sometimes engage in at least one of these activities. Being female, an attending physician, and increased time in clinical practice were predictive of active participation in bereavement care. Nearly all participants (96%) believe that bereavement care is part of good clinical care, while 8% indicate that bereavement support is not their responsibility. Lack of time and resources were the biggest barriers to providing bereavement support. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pediatric oncologists engage in clinical practices to support bereaved families. Lack of time and physical resources pose significant barriers to clinician's efforts. Additional supports should be explored to increase pediatric oncology physician uptake of bereavement care practices.
BACKGROUND: Bereavement support is a core tenet of palliative care that may prove difficult for clinicians as it is time-consuming, emotionally charged, and not emphasized in pediatrics training. This project is intended to describe the opinions, knowledge, and practice of bereavement care among pediatric oncologists to identify gaps in clinical care. PROCEDURES: An internet-based survey instrument was pilot tested, refined, and distributed to pediatric oncologists in the United States. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9.2. RESULTS: Electronic surveys were distributed to 2,061 pediatric oncologists and 522 surveys (25%) were fully completed. Participants were asked how likely they are to engage in particular bereavement activities (phone calls, condolence cards, memorial services, family meetings, or referrals for counseling) following the death of a pediatric cancerpatient. Eighty-two percent of participants, at least, sometimes engage in at least one of these activities. Being female, an attending physician, and increased time in clinical practice were predictive of active participation in bereavement care. Nearly all participants (96%) believe that bereavement care is part of good clinical care, while 8% indicate that bereavement support is not their responsibility. Lack of time and resources were the biggest barriers to providing bereavement support. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of pediatric oncologists engage in clinical practices to support bereaved families. Lack of time and physical resources pose significant barriers to clinician's efforts. Additional supports should be explored to increase pediatric oncology physician uptake of bereavement care practices.
Authors: Mary Jo Gilmer; Terrah L Foster; Kathryn Vannatta; Maru Barrera; Betty Davies; Mary S Dietrich; Diane L Fairclough; Jamie Grollman; Cynthia A Gerhardt Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2012-07-10 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Anthony L Back; Jessica P Young; Ellen McCown; Ruth A Engelberg; Elizabeth K Vig; Lynn F Reinke; Marjorie D Wenrich; Barbara B McGrath; J Randall Curtis Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-03-09
Authors: Santiago Borasino; Wynne Morrison; Jordan Silberman; Robert M Nelson; Chris Feudtner Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2008-11-17 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; William J Gradishar; Michael Kosty; Daniel Satele; Helen Chew; Leora Horn; Ben Clark; Amy E Hanley; Quyen Chu; John Pippen; Jeff Sloan; Marilyn Raymond Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kathleen L Meert; Susan Eggly; Robert A Berg; David L Wessel; Christopher J L Newth; Thomas P Shanley; Rick Harrison; Heidi Dalton; Amy E Clark; J Michael Dean; Allan Doctor; Carol E Nicholson Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Susan Eggly; Kathleen L Meert; John Berger; Jerry Zimmerman; K J S Anand; Christopher J L Newth; Rick Harrison; Joseph Carcillo; J Michael Dean; Douglas F Willson Journal: J Palliat Care Date: 2013 Impact factor: 2.250
Authors: Kirk D Henny; Christopher C Duke; Angelica Geter; Zaneta Gaul; Chantell Frazier; Jennifer Peterson; Kate Buchacz; Madeline Y Sutton Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-11
Authors: Emily Morell Balkin; James N Kirkpatrick; Beth Kaufman; Keith M Swetz; Lynn A Sleeper; Joanne Wolfe; Elizabeth D Blume Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Kirk D Henny; Christopher C Duke; Kate Buchacz; John T Brooks; Taraz Samandari; Madeline Y Sutton Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-10-31 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Brian T Cheng; Michael Rost; Eva De Clercq; Louisa Arnold; Bernice S Elger; Tenzin Wangmo Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 4.452