Literature DB >> 28072579

Development of advanced signal processing and source imaging methods for superparamagnetic relaxometry.

Ming-Xiong Huang1, Bill Anderson, Charles W Huang, Gerd J Kunde, Erika C Vreeland, Jeffrey W Huang, Andrei N Matlashov, Todor Karaulanov, Christopher P Nettles, Andrew Gomez, Kayla Minser, Caroline Weldon, Giulio Paciotti, Michael Harsh, Roland R Lee, Edward R Flynn.   

Abstract

Superparamagnetic relaxometry (SPMR) is a highly sensitive technique for the in vivo detection of tumor cells and may improve early stage detection of cancers. SPMR employs superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION). After a brief magnetizing pulse is used to align the SPION, SPMR measures the time decay of SPION using super-conducting quantum interference device (SQUID) sensors. Substantial research has been carried out in developing the SQUID hardware and in improving the properties of the SPION. However, little research has been done in the pre-processing of sensor signals and post-processing source modeling in SPMR. In the present study, we illustrate new pre-processing tools that were developed to: (1) remove trials contaminated with artifacts, (2) evaluate and ensure that a single decay process associated with bounded SPION exists in the data, (3) automatically detect and correct flux jumps, and (4) accurately fit the sensor signals with different decay models. Furthermore, we developed an automated approach based on multi-start dipole imaging technique to obtain the locations and magnitudes of multiple magnetic sources, without initial guesses from the users. A regularization process was implemented to solve the ambiguity issue related to the SPMR source variables. A procedure based on reduced chi-square cost-function was introduced to objectively obtain the adequate number of dipoles that describe the data. The new pre-processing tools and multi-start source imaging approach have been successfully evaluated using phantom data. In conclusion, these tools and multi-start source modeling approach substantially enhance the accuracy and sensitivity in detecting and localizing sources from the SPMR signals. Furthermore, multi-start approach with regularization provided robust and accurate solutions for a poor SNR condition similar to the SPMR detection sensitivity in the order of 1000 cells. We believe such algorithms will help establishing the industrial standards for SPMR when applying the technique in pre-clinical and clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28072579      PMCID: PMC5797703          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa553b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  21 in total

1.  Sources on the anterior and posterior banks of the central sulcus identified from magnetic somatosensory evoked responses using multistart spatio-temporal localization.

Authors:  M X Huang; C Aine; L Davis; J Butman; R Christner; M Weisend; J Stephen; J Meyer; J Silveri; M Herman; R R Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Multistart algorithms for MEG empirical data analysis reliably characterize locations and time courses of multiple sources.

Authors:  C Aine; M Huang; J Stephen; R Christner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Magnetorelaxometry procedures for quantitative imaging and characterization of magnetic nanoparticles in biomedical applications.

Authors:  Maik Liebl; Frank Wiekhorst; Dietmar Eberbeck; Patricia Radon; Dirk Gutkelch; Daniel Baumgarten; Uwe Steinhoff; Lutz Trahms
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.411

4.  Magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Lutz Trahms
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.411

5.  A parietal-frontal network studied by somatosensory oddball MEG responses, and its cross-modal consistency.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Roland R Lee; Gregory A Miller; Robert J Thoma; Faith M Hanlon; Kim M Paulson; Kimberly Martin; Deborah L Harrington; Michael P Weisend; J Christopher Edgar; Jose M Canive
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A biomagnetic system for in vivo cancer imaging.

Authors:  E R Flynn; H C Bryant
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Imaging of Her2-targeted magnetic nanoparticles for breast cancer detection: comparison of SQUID-detected magnetic relaxometry and MRI.

Authors:  Natalie L Adolphi; Kimberly S Butler; Debbie M Lovato; T E Tessier; Jason E Trujillo; Helen J Hathaway; Danielle L Fegan; Todd C Monson; Tyler E Stevens; Dale L Huber; Jaivijay Ramu; Michelle L Milne; Stephen A Altobelli; Howard C Bryant; Richard S Larson; Edward R Flynn
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source localization: model order and limits of source resolution.

Authors:  S Supek; C J Aine
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Detection of breast cancer cells using targeted magnetic nanoparticles and ultra-sensitive magnetic field sensors.

Authors:  Helen J Hathaway; Kimberly S Butler; Natalie L Adolphi; Debbie M Lovato; Robert Belfon; Danielle Fegan; Todd C Monson; Jason E Trujillo; Trace E Tessier; Howard C Bryant; Dale L Huber; Richard S Larson; Edward R Flynn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.