Literature DB >> 28072524

Common Hits Approach: Combining Pharmacophore Modeling and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Marcus Wieder1,2, Arthur Garon1, Ugo Perricone1,3, Stefan Boresch2, Thomas Seidel1, Anna Maria Almerico3, Thierry Langer1.   

Abstract

We present a new approach that incorporates flexibility based on extensive MD simulations of protein-ligand complexes into structure-based pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening. The approach uses the multiple coordinate sets saved during the MD simulations and generates for each frame a pharmacophore model. Pharmacophore models with the same pharmacophore features are pooled. In this way the high number of pharmacophore models that results from the MD simulation is reduced to only a few hundred representative pharmacophore models. Virtual screening runs are performed with every representative pharmacophore model; the screening results are combined and rescored to generate a single hit-list. The score for a particular molecule is calculated based on the number of representative pharmacophore models which classified it as active. Hence, the method is called common hits approach (CHA). The steps between the MD simulation and the final hit-list are performed automatically and without user interaction. We test the performance of CHA for virtual screening using screening databases with active and inactive compounds for 40 protein-ligand systems. The results of the CHA are compared to the (i) median screening performance of all representative pharmacophore models of protein-ligand systems, as well as to the virtual screening performance of (ii) a random classifier, (iii) the pharmacophore model derived from the experimental structure in the PDB, and (iv) the representative pharmacophore model appearing most frequently during the MD simulation. For the 34 (out of 40) protein-ligand complexes, for which at least one of the approaches was able to perform better than a random classifier, the highest enrichment was achieved using CHA in 68% of the cases, compared to 12% for the PDB pharmacophore model and 20% for the representative pharmacophore model appearing most frequently. The availabilithy of diverse sets of different pharmacophore models is utilized to analyze some additional questions of interest in 3D pharmacophore-based virtual screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28072524     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  18 in total

Review 1.  Generative chemistry: drug discovery with deep learning generative models.

Authors:  Yuemin Bian; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Comparing pharmacophore models derived from crystallography and NMR ensembles.

Authors:  Phani Ghanakota; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Computational Evaluation of Interaction Between Curcumin Derivatives and Amyloid-β Monomers and Fibrils: Relevance to Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Adrian Orjuela; Johant Lakey-Beitia; Randy Mojica-Flores; Muralidhar L Hegde; Isaias Lans; Jorge Alí-Torres; K S Rao
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.472

4.  Computational Identification of Novel Kir6 Channel Inhibitors.

Authors:  Xingyu Chen; Arthur Garon; Marcus Wieder; Marien J C Houtman; Eva-Maria Zangerl-Plessl; Thierry Langer; Marcel A G van der Heyden; Anna Stary-Weinzinger
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 5.  Residue-based pharmacophore approaches to study protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Rojan Shrestha; Jorge Eduardo Fajardo; Andras Fiser
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 6.809

6.  Identification of New Potential APE1 Inhibitors by Pharmacophore Modeling and Molecular Docking.

Authors:  In Won Lee; Jonghwan Yoon; Gunhee Lee; Minho Lee
Journal:  Genomics Inform       Date:  2017-12-29

7.  PyRod Enables Rational Homology Model-based Virtual Screening Against MCHR1.

Authors:  David Schaller; Gerhard Wolber
Journal:  Mol Inform       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.353

8.  The Binding Mode of the Sonic Hedgehog Inhibitor Robotnikinin, a Combined Docking and QM/MM MD Study.

Authors:  Manuel Hitzenberger; Daniela Schuster; Thomas S Hofer
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 9.  Role of Computational Methods in Going beyond X-ray Crystallography to Explore Protein Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Ashutosh Srivastava; Tetsuro Nagai; Arpita Srivastava; Osamu Miyashita; Florence Tama
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Selectivity Challenges in Docking Screens for GPCR Targets and Antitargets.

Authors:  Dahlia R Weiss; Joel Karpiak; Xi-Ping Huang; Maria F Sassano; Jiankun Lyu; Bryan L Roth; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.