Andrea H Kline-Simon1, Raye Z Litten2, Constance M Weisner1,3, Daniel E Falk2. 1. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California. 2. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), Bethesda, Maryland. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) has traditionally been abstinence oriented, but new research and regulatory guidelines suggest that low-risk drinking may also be an acceptable treatment outcome. However, little is known about long-term outcomes for patients who become low-risk drinkers posttreatment. This study explores a posttreatment low-risk drinking outcome as a predictor of future drinking and psychosocial outcomes over 9 years. METHODS:Study participants were adults with AUDs at treatment entry who received follow-up interviews 6 months posttreatment intake (N = 1,061) in 2 large randomized studies conducted at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large private, nonprofit, integrated health system. Six-month drinking status was defined as abstinent, low-risk (nonabstinent, no 5+ drinking days), or heavy drinking (1 or more days of 5+ drinks). Using logistic regression models, we explored the relationship between past 30-day drinking status at 6 months and odds of being abstinent or a low-risk drinker (compared to heavy drinking), and positive Addiction Severity Index psychosocial outcomes over 9 years (9-year follow-up rate of 73%). RESULTS: Abstainers and low-risk drinkers at 6 months had higher odds of recent abstinence/low-risk drinking over 9 years than heavy drinkers; abstainers had better drinking outcomes than low-risk drinkers. Additionally, among those with interview data, 95% of abstainers and 94% of low-risk drinkers at 6 months were abstinent/low-risk drinkers at 9 years; surprisingly, 89% of heavy drinkers at 6 months were also abstinent/low-risk drinkers although still significantly fewer than the other groups. Abstainers and low-risk drinkers at 6 months had better psychiatric outcomes, and abstainers had better family/social outcomes than heavy drinkers; medical outcomes did not differ. Low-risk drinkers and abstainers showed no reliable differences across psychosocial measures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a low-risk drinking outcome may be reasonable over the long-term for some alcohol-dependent individuals receiving addiction treatment.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Treatment for alcohol use disorders (AUDs) has traditionally been abstinence oriented, but new research and regulatory guidelines suggest that low-risk drinking may also be an acceptable treatment outcome. However, little is known about long-term outcomes for patients who become low-risk drinkers posttreatment. This study explores a posttreatment low-risk drinking outcome as a predictor of future drinking and psychosocial outcomes over 9 years. METHODS: Study participants were adults with AUDs at treatment entry who received follow-up interviews 6 months posttreatment intake (N = 1,061) in 2 large randomized studies conducted at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a large private, nonprofit, integrated health system. Six-month drinking status was defined as abstinent, low-risk (nonabstinent, no 5+ drinking days), or heavy drinking (1 or more days of 5+ drinks). Using logistic regression models, we explored the relationship between past 30-day drinking status at 6 months and odds of being abstinent or a low-risk drinker (compared to heavy drinking), and positive Addiction Severity Index psychosocial outcomes over 9 years (9-year follow-up rate of 73%). RESULTS: Abstainers and low-risk drinkers at 6 months had higher odds of recent abstinence/low-risk drinking over 9 years than heavy drinkers; abstainers had better drinking outcomes than low-risk drinkers. Additionally, among those with interview data, 95% of abstainers and 94% of low-risk drinkers at 6 months were abstinent/low-risk drinkers at 9 years; surprisingly, 89% of heavy drinkers at 6 months were also abstinent/low-risk drinkers although still significantly fewer than the other groups. Abstainers and low-risk drinkers at 6 months had better psychiatric outcomes, and abstainers had better family/social outcomes than heavy drinkers; medical outcomes did not differ. Low-risk drinkers and abstainers showed no reliable differences across psychosocial measures. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a low-risk drinking outcome may be reasonable over the long-term for some alcohol-dependent individuals receiving addiction treatment.
Authors: Bridget F Grant; Risë B Goldstein; Tulshi D Saha; S Patricia Chou; Jeesun Jung; Haitao Zhang; Roger P Pickering; W June Ruan; Sharon M Smith; Boji Huang; Deborah S Hasin Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Andrea H Kline-Simon; Constance M Weisner; Sujaya Parthasarathy; Daniel E Falk; Raye Z Litten; Jennifer R Mertens Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Andrea H Kline-Simon; Daniel E Falk; Raye Z Litten; Jennifer R Mertens; Joanne Fertig; Megan Ryan; Constance M Weisner Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Susan E Collins; Véronique S Grazioli; Nicole I Torres; Emily M Taylor; Connor B Jones; Gail E Hoffman; Laura Haelsig; Mengdan D Zhu; Alyssa S Hatsukami; Molly J Koker; Patrick Herndon; Shawna M Greenleaf; Parker E Dean Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2015-02-08 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Caroline M Tanner; Allan L Bernstein; Robin D Fross; Amethyst Leimpeter; Daniel A Bloch; Lorene M Nelson Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Bankole A Johnson; Norman Rosenthal; Julie A Capece; Frank Wiegand; Lian Mao; Karen Beyers; Amy McKay; Nassima Ait-Daoud; Raymond F Anton; Domenic A Ciraulo; Henry R Kranzler; Karl Mann; Stephanie S O'Malley; Robert M Swift Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Katie Witkiewitz; Henry R Kranzler; Kevin A Hallgren; Stephanie S O'Malley; Daniel E Falk; Raye Z Litten; Deborah S Hasin; Karl F Mann; Raymond F Anton Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Dustin C Lee; Nicolas J Schlienz; Erica N Peters; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Eric C Strain; Ryan Vandrey Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2018-11-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Katherine E Watkins; Allison J Ober; Karen Lamp; Mimi Lind; Claude Setodji; Karen Chan Osilla; Sarah B Hunter; Colleen M McCullough; Kirsten Becker; Praise O Iyiewuare; Allison Diamant; Keith Heinzerling; Harold Alan Pincus Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Katharine A Bradley; Jennifer F Bobb; Evette J Ludman; Laura J Chavez; Andrew J Saxon; Joseph O Merrill; Emily C Williams; Eric J Hawkins; Ryan M Caldeiro; Carol E Achtmeyer; Diane M Greenberg; Gwen T Lapham; Julie E Richards; Amy K Lee; Daniel R Kivlahan Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Vanessa A Palzes; Andrea H Kline-Simon; Derek D Satre; Stacy Sterling; Constance Weisner; Felicia W Chi Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Katie Witkiewitz; Megan Kirouac; Corey R Roos; Adam D Wilson; Kevin A Hallgren; Adrian J Bravo; Kevin S Montes; Stephen A Maisto Journal: Psychol Addict Behav Date: 2018-08-30
Authors: Vanessa A Palzes; Andrea H Kline-Simon; Derek D Satre; Stacy Sterling; Constance Weisner; Felicia W Chi Journal: Addiction Date: 2021-07-12 Impact factor: 6.526