Literature DB >> 28072449

A survival guide to Landsat preprocessing.

Nicholas E Young1, Ryan S Anderson1, Stephen M Chignell1,2, Anthony G Vorster1,2, Rick Lawrence3, Paul H Evangelista1,2.   

Abstract

Landsat data are increasingly used for ecological monitoring and research. These data often require preprocessing prior to analysis to account for sensor, solar, atmospheric, and topographic effects. However, ecologists using these data are faced with a literature containing inconsistent terminology, outdated methods, and a vast number of approaches with contradictory recommendations. These issues can, at best, make determining the correct preprocessing workflow a difficult and time-consuming task and, at worst, lead to erroneous results. We address these problems by providing a concise overview of the Landsat missions and sensors and by clarifying frequently conflated terms and methods. Preprocessing steps commonly applied to Landsat data are differentiated and explained, including georeferencing and co-registration, conversion to radiance, solar correction, atmospheric correction, topographic correction, and relative correction. We then synthesize this information by presenting workflows and a decision tree for determining the appropriate level of imagery preprocessing given an ecological research question, while emphasizing the need to tailor each workflow to the study site and question at hand. We recommend a parsimonious approach to Landsat preprocessing that avoids unnecessary steps and recommend approaches and data products that are well tested, easily available, and sufficiently documented. Our focus is specific to ecological applications of Landsat data, yet many of the concepts and recommendations discussed are also appropriate for other disciplines and remote sensing platforms.
© 2017 The Authors. Ecology, published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc., on behalf of the Ecological Society of America.

Keywords:  atmospheric correction; change detection; decision tree; ecology; image; normalization; radiometric correction; remote sensing; review; satellite; topographic correction; workflow

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28072449     DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  Exploring Built-Up Indices and Machine Learning Regressions for Multi-Temporal Building Density Monitoring Based on Landsat Series.

Authors:  R Suharyadi; Deha Agus Umarhadi; Disyacitta Awanda; Wirastuti Widyatmanti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Lockdown effects on total suspended solids concentrations in the Lower Min River (China) during COVID-19 using time-series remote sensing images.

Authors:  Hanqiu Xu; Guangzhi Xu; Xiaole Wen; Xiujuan Hu; Yifan Wang
Journal:  Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf       Date:  2021-01-11

3.  Both real-time and long-term environmental data perform well in predicting shorebird distributions in managed habitat.

Authors:  Erin E Conlisk; Gregory H Golet; Mark D Reynolds; Blake A Barbaree; Kristin A Sesser; Kristin B Byrd; Sam Veloz; Matthew E Reiter
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 6.105

4.  Patterns of human-wildlife conflict and compensation practices around Daxueshan Nature Reserve, China.

Authors:  Cheng Huang; Xue-You Li; Liu-Jun Shi; Xue-Long Jiang
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2018-05-31

5.  Mapping canopy nitrogen-scapes to assess foraging habitat for a vulnerable arboreal folivore in mixed-species Eucalyptus forests.

Authors:  Benjamin Wagner; Patrick J Baker; Ben D Moore; Craig R Nitschke
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  An invasive species erodes the performance of coastal wetland protected areas.

Authors:  Junlin Ren; Jianshe Chen; Changlin Xu; Johan van de Koppel; Mads S Thomsen; Shiyun Qiu; Fangyan Cheng; Wanjuan Song; Quan-Xing Liu; Chi Xu; Junhong Bai; Yihui Zhang; Baoshan Cui; Mark D Bertness; Brian R Silliman; Bo Li; Qiang He
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Variability and uncertainty in forest biomass estimates from the tree to landscape scale: the role of allometric equations.

Authors:  Anthony G Vorster; Paul H Evangelista; Atticus E L Stovall; Seth Ex
Journal:  Carbon Balance Manag       Date:  2020-05-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.