| Literature DB >> 28071724 |
Jin Liu1,2,3, Defang Li1,2,3,4, Lei Dang1,2,3,4, Chao Liang1,2,3, Baosheng Guo1,5, Cheng Lu2,6, Xiaojuan He1,6, Hilda Y S Cheung1,4, Bing He1,2,3, Biao Liu1,2,3,6, Fangfei Li1,2,3, Jun Lu1,2,3, Luyao Wang1, Atik Badshah Shaikh1,3, Feng Jiang1,2,3, Changwei Lu1, Songlin Peng1,7, Zongkang Zhang8, Bao-Ting Zhang8, Xiaohua Pan1,9, Lianbo Xiao1,10, Aiping Lu1,2,3,4,5,6,10, Ge Zhang1,2,3,4,5,10.
Abstract
The role of osteoclastic miRNAs in regulating osteolytic bone metastasis (OBM) of breast cancer is still underexplored. Here, we examined the expression profiles of osteoclastogenic miRNAs in human bone specimens and identified that miR-214-3p was significantly upregulated in breast cancer patients with OBM. Consistently, we found increased miR-214-3p within osteoclasts, which was associated with the elevated bone resorption, during the development of OBM in human breast cancer xenografted nude mice (BCX). Furthermore, genetic ablation of osteoclastic miR-214-3p in nude mice prevent the development of OBM. Conditioned medium from MDA-MB-231 cells dramatically stimulated miR-214-3p expression to promote osteoclast differentiation. Mechanistically, a series of in vitro study showed that miR-214-3p directly targeted Traf3 to promote osteoclast activity and bone-resorbing activity. In addition, osteoclast-specific miR-214-3p knock-in mice showed remarkably increased bone resorption when compared to the littermate controls, which was attenuated after osteoclast-targeted treatment with Traf3 3'UTR-containing plasmid. In BCX nude mice, osteoclast-targeted antagomir-214-3p delivery could recover the TRAF3 protein expression and attenuate the development of OBM, respectively. Collectively, inhibition of osteoclastic miR-214-3p may be a potential therapeutic strategy for breast cancer patients with OBM. Meanwhile, the intraosseous TRAF3 could be a promising biomarker for evaluation of the treatment response of antagomir-214-3p.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28071724 PMCID: PMC5223164 DOI: 10.1038/srep40487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Elevated miR-214-3p level associates with increased bone resorption in bone specimens from breast cancer patients.
(a) The miR-214-3p level and (b) mRNA levels of TRAP and CTSK in bone specimens from breast cancer patients and cancer-free individuals with fracture (Control). (c) The correlation analysis between miR-214-3p level and TRAP (or CTSK) mRNA level in bone tissue. Note: miR-214-3p levels were normalized to U6 and osteoclast marker genes mRNA levels were normalized to Gapdh. *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.
Figure 2Elevated osteoclastic miR-214-3p level associates with increased bone resorption in bone specimens from BCX nude mice.
(a) The osteoclastic miR-214-3p levels (upper left), Oc.S/BS in proximal tibia (upper middle), serum CTX-I levels (upper right) and the representative images of TRAP staining in proximal tibia (bottom) were examined (n = 12 for each group). Scale bar: 100 μm. Arrow indicates TRAP-positive cells. The levels of miR-214-3p were normalized to the mean value of control group. (b) The correlation analysis between osteoclastic miR-214-3p level and Oc.S/BS and between osteoclastic miR-214-3p level and serum CTX-I levels was performed, respectively. Note: miR-214-3p levels were normalized to U6 and osteoclast marker genes mRNA levels were normalized to Gapdh. *P < 0.05 when compared to Week 1 in BCX mice.
Figure 3Genetic ablation of osteoclastic miR-214-3p prevents osteolytic bone metastasis in BCX nude mice.
Q-PCR analysis of the miR-214-3p levels (a) and the TRAP and CTSK mRNA levels (b) in osteoclasts and non-osteoclasts isolated from bone marrow cells by MACS. (c) ELISA assay of serum CTX-I levels. (d) The representative images of TRAP staining in distal femur. Scale bar: 100 μm (e) Bone histomorphometric analysis for Oc.S/BS and N.Oc/B.Pm in proximal tibia. (f) The representative bioluminescence imaging showing the degree of metastasis. (g) The number of nude mice with/without bone metastasis in the forelimb, hind limb and spine area detected by bioluminescence imaging. (h) The bioluminescence signal intensity at the sites of bone metastasis (left) and non-bone metastasis (right). (i) The representative micro-CT images showing the osteolytic bone lesion at distal femur. Scale bar: 1 mm (j) The number of osteolytic lesion at distal femur. Note: n = 8 for each group. (a,b) CKO: osteoclast-specific miR-214-3p knockout nude mice, WT: Wild-type nude mice. (c–j) WT: WT nude mice with BCX, CKO: CKO nude mice with BCX. Data were means ± s.d. **P < 0.01.
Figure 4MiR-214-3p targets Traf3 to functionally promote osteoclast differentiation in vitro.
(a) Sequence alignments between miR-214-3p and candidate binding sites in the 3′UTR of Traf3. (b) Schematic diagram illustrating the design of luciferase reporters with the WT Traf3 3′ UTR (WT 3′ UTR) or the site-directed mutant Traf3 3′ UTR (3′ UTR-Mut). The sequences of agomir-214-3p and a agomir-214-3p mutant (agomir-214-Mut) are also shown. Luc, luciferase. (c) The relationship between miR-214-3p level (top) and the mount of TRAF3 protein (bottom) during osteoclast differentiation in RAW264.7 cells. (d) The effects of agomir-214-3p and agomir-214-Mut on Traf3 mRNA levels (top) and the amount of TRAF3 protein (bottom) in RAW 264.7 cells. (e) The effect of agomir-214-3p and mutated agomir-214-3p on luciferase activity in RAW 264.7 cells transfected with either the WT the mutant Traf3 3′ UTR reporter (left) or Traf3 3′ UTR reporter (right). (f) The effect of antagomir-214-3p on luciferase activity in RAW 264.7 cells transfected with either the WT Traf3 3′ UTR reporter or the mutant Traf3 3′ UTR reporter. (g) Real-time PCR analysis of Trap and Ctsk mRNA levels (top) and western blot analysis of TRAF3 protein (bottom) in RAW264.7 cells after blockade of miR-214-3p binding to Traf3 by overexpression of WT Traf3 3′UTR (UTR). (h) Trap and Ctsk mRNA levels in RAW264.7 cells after the indicated treatment. The results from a scrambled control siRNA (siRNA-NC) and a mock transfection are also shown. (i) Western blot analysis of whole cell lysates of osteoclasts transfected with antagomir-214-3p and cultured with RANKL for 5 days. Note: All data are the mean ± s.d. from three independent experiments. *P < 0.05, NS, not significant.
Figure 5The elevated miR-214-3p within osteoclast targets TRAF3 to promote osteoclastic bone resorption in vivo.
(a) Q-PCR analysis of the mRNA levels of osteoclast marker genes in bone tissue. (b) ELISA analysis of serum CTX-1 level from OC-miR-214-3p and WT mice. (c) Western blot analysis of the protein expression of TRAF3 in bone tissues. (d) In vitro bone resorption activity assay showing the bone resorption pit surface of the osteoclasts differentiated from bone marrow macrophages (BMMs) derived from either OC-miR-214-3p mice or WT mice. (e) The micro-CT analysis for the BMD and BV/TV of the proximal tibia from the indicated group after treatment. (f) The representative micro-CT images for the trabecular micro-architecture in proximal tibia. Scale bar: 1 mm. Note: n = 8~10 for each group. (g) Bone histomorphometric analysis for Oc.S/BS and N.Oc/B.Pm in proximal tibia. (h) The representative TRAP staining images for the trabecular bone in proximal tibia. Scale bar: 100 μm. Arrow indicates TRAP+ cells. Note: n = 6 for each group. Data were means ± s.d. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. OC-214: OC-miR-214-3p mice; WT: age-matched littermates; BS: mice that were sacrificed before treatment as baseline; PBS: mice treated with PBS as blank control; Veh: mice treated with (D-Asp)8-liposome alone; 3′UTR-Mut: mice treated with (D-Asp)8-liposome-mutant Traf3 3′UTR plasmid; 3′UTR: mice treated with (D-Asp)8-liposome-Traf3 3′UTR plasmid.
Figure 6The effects of antagomir-214 delivered by (D-Asp8)-liposome on osteolytic bone metastasis in nude mice with breast cancer xenografts.
(a) A schematic diagram illustrating the experimental design. (b) ELISA analysis of serum CTX-1 level in mice from the indicated group after treatment. (c) The representative images for TRAP staining in the proximal tibiae bone sections from the indicated group after treatment. Arrow heads indicate osteoclasts. Scale bar: 50 μm. (d) The bone histomorphometric analysis for Oc.S/BS and N.Oc/B.Pm in the proximal tibiae bone sections from the indicated group after treatment. (e) The representative bioluminescence imaging showing the degree of metastasis in mice from the indicated group after treatment. (f) The bioluminescence signal intensity at the sites of bone metastasis (left) and non-bone metastasis (right) in the mice from the indicated group after treatment. (g) Representative micro-CT images showing the osteolytic bone lesion at proximal tibiae from the indicated group after treatment. Arrowheads indicate the osteolytic bone lesions. Scale bar = 1 mm. (h) The number of osteolytic lesion at proximal tibiae from the indicated group after treatment. Note: n = 12 for each group. The data were presented as the mean ± s.d., **P < 0.01. Control: nude mice without breast cancer xenografts, Model: breast cancer xenografted nude mice (BCX mice) administrated with PBS, Veh: BCX mice administrated with (D-Asp)8-liposome, NC: BCX mice administrated with (D-Asp)8-liposome-antagomir negative control, AMO: BCX mice administrated with (D-Asp8)-liposome-antagomir-214-3p.