Literature DB >> 28070821

Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of standardized antifactor Xa-based unfractionated heparin protocols in obese versus non-obese patients.

Manuel Isherwood1, Michelle L Murphy2, Angela L Bingham3, Laura A Siemianowski2, Krystal Hunter2, James M Hollands3.   

Abstract

Recent data have suggested that standard unfractionated heparin (UFH) protocols may over-anticoagulate obese patients. The goal of this retrospective study was to observe differences in anticoagulation parameters and safety outcomes for standardized antifactor Xa UFH protocols in obese and non-obese populations. Obese patients (N = 148) were identified over a 20-month period and matched to 148 non-obese patients based on age, gender, and admission date. Patients were included if they were on one of three approved UFH protocols [high (target antifactor Xa 0.3-0.7 IU/mL), moderate (0.3-0.5 IU/mL), or low (0.1-0.2 IU/mL) dose] for ≥24 consecutive hours and had ≥1 antifactor Xa level drawn during the infusion. Groups were compared for doses at first and second consecutive therapeutic antifactor Xa level, major bleeding, and in-hospital mortality. Obese patients required a significantly lower mean weight-based infusion rate to attain first therapeutic antifactor Xa level compared to non-obese patients in both the high dose (19.45 vs. 15.29 units/kg/h, p < 0.001) and the moderate dose populations (15.0 vs. 12.94 units/kg/h, p = 0.003). Similarly, patients in both the high and moderate dose populations had significant differences in mean infusion rates to attain second consecutive therapeutic antifactor Xa levels. There was no difference between infusion rates for the primary outcomes in the low dose population. There was no difference between groups in major bleeding or mortality outcomes. Similar to data using UFH protocols based on activated partial thromboplastin time, obese patients require lower weight-based UFH doses to attain therapeutic anticoagulation. Institutions using or changing to antifactor Xa based protocols may need to modify protocols for obese patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulation; Antifactor Xa; Body mass index; Heparin; Obesity; Patient safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28070821     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-016-1466-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  13 in total

Review 1.  Antifactor Xa levels versus activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin.

Authors:  Jeremy W Vandiver; Thomas G Vondracek
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 4.705

2.  Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium.

Authors:  Roxana Mehran; Sunil V Rao; Deepak L Bhatt; C Michael Gibson; Adriano Caixeta; John Eikelboom; Sanjay Kaul; Stephen D Wiviott; Venu Menon; Eugenia Nikolsky; Victor Serebruany; Marco Valgimigli; Pascal Vranckx; David Taggart; Joseph F Sabik; Donald E Cutlip; Mitchell W Krucoff; E Magnus Ohman; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Harvey White
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Monitoring unfractionated heparin therapy with antifactor Xa activity results in fewer monitoring tests and dosage changes than monitoring with the activated partial thromboplastin time.

Authors:  T K Rosborough
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.705

4.  Identifying optimal initial infusion rates for unfractionated heparin in morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  Jennifer N Riney; James M Hollands; Jennifer R Smith; Eli N Deal
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Unfractionated heparin dosing for therapeutic anticoagulation in critically ill obese adults.

Authors:  E M Hohner; R M Kruer; V T Gilmore; M Streiff; H Gibbs
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.425

6.  Discordant aPTT and anti-Xa values and outcomes in hospitalized patients treated with intravenous unfractionated heparin.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Price; Jing Jin; Huong Marie Nguyen; Gomathi Krishnan; Raffick Bowen; James L Zehnder
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Safety and efficacy of the use of institutional unfractionated heparin protocols for therapeutic anticoagulation in obese patients: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  Sooyoung Shin; Elizabeth F Harthan
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.276

9.  Comparison of heparin dosing based on actual body weight in non-obese, obese and morbidly obese critically ill patients.

Authors:  Anthony T Gerlach; Jerilynn Folino; Benjamin N Morris; Claire V Murphy; Stansilaw P Stawicki; Charles H Cook
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2013-07

Review 10.  Guidance for the practical management of the heparin anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Maureen A Smythe; Jennifer Priziola; Paul P Dobesh; Diane Wirth; Adam Cuker; Ann K Wittkowsky
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.300

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intravenous unfractionated heparin dosing in obese patients using anti-Xa levels.

Authors:  Alex M Ebied; Tammy Li; Samantha F Axelrod; Douglas J Tam; Yiqing Chen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.300

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.