Literature DB >> 28070669

Prospective cohort study of cancer patients diagnosed with incidental venous thromboembolism on routine computed tomography scans.

Carmen P Escalante1, Gregory W Gladish2, Wei Qiao3, Ali Zalpour4, Binara Assylbekova4, Shuwei Gao4, Kelechi A Olejeme4, Marsha N Richardson4, Maria E Suarez-Almazor4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major complication of cancer with recent increasing reports of incidental VTE. The objectives are to estimate the prevalence of incidental VTE in cancer patients on staging CT scans, identify common symptoms, and determine VTE recurrence in a prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One thousand ninety patients were studied. Adult cancer patients scheduled for outpatient staging CT scans were eligible. VTE cases were followed for 6 months. Fisher's exact test for group comparisons of categorical variables and generalized linear modeling to estimate the prevalence of incidental VTE was used.
RESULTS: The mean age was 58 years (range 18-87 years); 50% were male. The prevalence of incidental VTE was 1.8% (CI 1.15-2.87%). Significant symptoms in patients with VTE included fatigue (p = 0.004), stress (p = 0.0195), depression (p = 0.019), poorer quality of life (p = 0.0194), and poorer physical well-being (p = 0.0007). All the patients with VTE had at least one comorbidity (p = 0.03). No patient had recurrence within 6 months.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of incidental VTE on staging CT scans is lower than previously reported. Symptoms were associated with VTE; however, further work is needed to understand whether these are clinically relevant. No VTE recurrences were noted following 6 months.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Incidental venous thromboembolism; Prevalence; Venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28070669     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-016-3559-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  10 in total

1.  Vascular enhancement and image quality of CT venography: comparison of standard and low kilovoltage settings.

Authors:  Atsuko Fujikawa; Shin Matsuoka; Kenji Kuramochi; Tatsuo Yoshikawa; Kunihiro Yagihashi; Yasuyuki Kurihara; Yasuo Nakajima
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Definition of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non-surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH.

Authors:  S Kaatz; D Ahmad; A C Spyropoulos; S Schulman
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  Incidental detection of pulmonary emboli on routine MDCT of the chest.

Authors:  Maria Luigia Storto; Angela Di Credico; Francesca Guido; Anna Rita Larici; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography.

Authors:  P A Loud; D S Katz; D A Bruce; D L Klippenstein; Z D Grossman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Incidental pulmonary emboli in oncology patients: prevalence, CT evaluation, and natural history.

Authors:  Gregory W Gladish; Du Hwan Choe; Edith M Marom; Bradley S Sabloff; Lyle D Broemeling; Reginald F Munden
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Relative impact of risk factors for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based study.

Authors:  John A Heit; W Michael O'Fallon; Tanya M Petterson; Christine M Lohse; Marc D Silverstein; David N Mohr; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-06-10

7.  Prevalence and significance of asymptomatic venous thromboembolic disease found on oncologic staging CT.

Authors:  Carmel G Cronin; Derek G Lohan; Maccon Keane; Clare Roche; Joseph M Murphy
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Incidental pulmonary emboli detected at helical CT: effect on patient care.

Authors:  C B Winston; R J Wechsler; A M Salazar; A B Kurtz; P W Spirn
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Unsuspected pulmonary embolism: prospective detection on routine helical CT scans.

Authors:  M V Gosselin; G D Rubin; A N Leung; J Huang; N W Rizk
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System: properties, applications, and interpretation.

Authors:  Kimberly Webster; David Cella; Kathleen Yost
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-12-16       Impact factor: 3.186

  10 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Incidental venous thromboembolism: is anticoagulation indicated?

Authors:  Marcello Di Nisio; Marc Carrier
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2017-12-08

2.  Clinical characteristics, management, and outcome of incidental pulmonary embolism in cancer patients.

Authors:  Aiham Qdaisat; Mona Kamal; Aisha Al-Breiki; Biman Goswami; Carol C Wu; Shouhao Zhou; Terry W Rice; Kumar Alagappan; Sai-Ching Jim Yeung
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-04-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.