| Literature DB >> 28070518 |
Weijie Ma1, Zhenfei Hong1, Hailing Liu2, Xi Chen1, Lu Ding3, Zhisu Liu1, Fuling Zhou3, Yufeng Yuan1.
Abstract
Background. The association between human endogenous retroviruses-K (HERV-K) (HML-2) and human disease, including a variety of cancers, has been indicated. However, the function of HERV-K (HML-2) in the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) still remains largely unclear. Methods. We detected the expression of HERV-K (HML-2) in 84 HCC tissues and adjacent nontumor tissues by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and analyzed its correlation with the clinical parameters. Result. The HEVR-K level was significantly increased in HCC compared with adjacent normal tissues (P < 0.01) which was proved to be significantly associated with cirrhosis (P < 0.05), tumor differentiation (P < 0.05), and TNM stage (P < 0.05). Moreover, the high expression of HERV-K (HML-2) had a poorer overall survival than patients with lower expression by a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (P < 0.01). The multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that the level of HERV-K (HML-2) was an independent prognostic factor for the overall survival rate of HCC patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated the diagnostic accuracy of HERV-K (HML-2) expression in HCC (AUC = 0.729, 74.7% sensitivity, and 67.8% specificity). Conclusions. Our results suggested that upregulation of HERV-K (HML-2) in HCC patients was significantly related to cancer progression and poor outcome, indicating that HERV-K (HML-2) might be a novel candidate prognostic biomarker for HCC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28070518 PMCID: PMC5192314 DOI: 10.1155/2016/8201642
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Association of HERV-K expression with clinical parameters in HCC.
| Characteristics |
| HERV-K relative expression (−log) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD |
|
| ||
| Tissue | −8.224 | <0.001 | ||
| HCC | 84 | 5.94 ± 0.83 | ||
| Adjacent noncancerous liver | 84 | 6.49 ± 0.72 | ||
| Gender | 0.306 | 0.240 | ||
| Male | 78 | 5.95 ± 0.86 | ||
| Female | 6 | 5.84 ± 0.32 | ||
| Age | −0.130 | 0.320 | ||
| <55 | 40 | 5.84 ± 1.00 | ||
| ≧55 | 44 | 6.02 ± 0.67 | ||
| Smoking | 1.280 | 0.204 | ||
| Negative | 43 | 6.05 ± 0.69 | ||
| Positive | 41 | 5.82 ± 0.95 | ||
| Alcoholism | 1.662 | 0.100 | ||
| Negative | 25 | 5.70 ± 1.18 | ||
| Positive | 59 | 6.03 ± 0.63 | ||
| Differentiation | 2.601 | 0.011 | ||
| High/moderate | 59 | 6.05 ± 0.68 | ||
| Low | 15 | 5.43 ± 1.23 | ||
| Missing | 10 | |||
| Size | 1.693 | 0.095 | ||
| <10 cm | 53 | 6.01 ± 0.85 | ||
| ≧10 cm | 23 | 5.66 ± 0.76 | ||
| Missing | 8 | |||
| Tumor nodes | −0.728 | 0.469 | ||
| Single | 66 | 5.91 ± 0.88 | ||
| Multi | 10 | 6.12 ± 0.61 | ||
| Missing | 8 | |||
| TNM stage | 2.144 | 0.035 | ||
| I~II | 34 | 6.12 ± 0.78 | ||
| III~IV | 42 | 5.72 ± 0.84 | ||
| Missing | 8 | |||
| HBV DNA (IU/mL) | 0.861 | 0.394 | ||
| <500 | 17 | 5.90 ± 0.68 | ||
| ≧500 | 34 | 5.68 ± 0.95 | ||
| Missing | 33 | |||
| Cirrhosis | −2.181 | 0.044 | ||
| Negative | 34 | 6.11 ± 0.65 | ||
| Positive | 14 | 5.39 ± 1.17 | ||
| Missing | 36 | |||
| AFP (ng/mL) | −0.137 | 0.891 | ||
| <200 | 41 | 5.93 ± 0.94 | ||
| ≧200 | 35 | 5.95 ± 0.75 | ||
| Missing | 8 | |||
| ALT (u/L) | 0.958 | 0.341 | ||
| <46 | 48 | 6.00 ± 0.76 | ||
| ≧46 | 32 | 5.81 ± 0.96 | ||
| Missing | 4 | |||
| AST (u/L) | 0.642 | 0.523 | ||
| <46 | 45 | 5.97 ± 0.66 | ||
| ≧46 | 35 | 5.86 ± 1.04 | ||
| Missing | 4 | |||
Data are mean ± SD. P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.
A paired t-test was used with the analysis of the differences between HCC and adjacent noncancerous liver. Independent t-tests were applied to the rest of data.
Figure 1Increased HERV-K (HML-2) expression in HCC tissues and the association with clinical parameters of HCC patients. The value of relative expression was detected by the value of −log of 2−ΔCt. (a) HERV-K (HML-2) expression level in tumor tissues was significantly higher than in nontumor tissues, P < 0.0001. (b) Differentiation: a: high/moderate; b: low; TNM stage: a: I-II; b: III-IV; Cirrhosis: negative/positive. Results are expressed as mean ± SD. All data were analyzed using Student's t-test. P < 0.05 and P < 0.01.
Figure 2High level of HERV-K (HML-2) predicts poor survival in HCC. Patients with higher HERV-K (HML-2) expression (n = 42) showed reduced survival time compared with patients with lower levels of HERV-K (HML-2) expression (n = 42) by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve analyses (log-rank test: P < 0.01).
Prognostic factors in Cox proportional hazards model.
| Factors |
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| ||
| Gender | 84 | 1.542 (0.549–4.327) | 0.411 | ||
| Age | 80 | 0.911 (0.492–1.685) | 0.766 | ||
| Smoking | 83 | 1.266 (0.689–2.326) | 0.448 | ||
| Alcoholism | 83 | 1.097 (0.561–2.142) | 0.787 | ||
| Cirrhosis | 48 | 0.813 (0.362–1.826) | 0.616 | ||
| Tumor number | 80 | 0.546 (0.194–1.535) | 0.251 | ||
| ALT | 80 | 0.978 (0.528–1.812) | 0.944 | ||
| AST | 80 | 1.013 (0.551–1.861) | 0.967 | ||
| AFP | 76 | 1.463 (0.786–2.723) | 0.230 | ||
| Differentiation | 74 | 1.866 (0.903–3.853) | 0.092 | ||
| TNM (III~IV versus I~II) | 76 | 4.386 (2.009–9.575) | <0.001 | 3.660 (1.647–8.130) | 0.001 |
| HERV-K expression (high low versus low high) | 84 | 3.017 (1.563–5.820) | 0.001 | 2.121 (1.070–4.203) | 0.031 |
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; AFP: α-fetoprotein; TNM: tumor-node-metastasis.
Figure 3ROC curves of HERV-K (HML-2) expression. (a) HERV-K (HML-2) was considered to be a valuable parameter in the prediction of HCC (AUC = 0.730, 95% CI: 65.21%–80.55%, and P < 0.0001). (b) The predicative value of HERV-K (HML-2) for differentiation of HCC resulted in AUC of 0.678 (95% CI: 50.70%–83.65%, P = 0.041). (c) The significant diagnostic value of HERV-K (HML-2) for TNM stage of HCC (AUC = 0.645, 95% CI: 51.79%–77.27%, and P = 0.030).