| Literature DB >> 28070321 |
Geoffrey Ssepuuya1, Ivan Muzira Mukisa1, Dorothy Nakimbugwe1.
Abstract
The nutritional and commercial potential of the edible grasshopper (Ruspolia nitidula, nsenene in Luganda), a delicacy in Uganda and many East African tribes, is limited by a short shelf life and unverified nutritional value. This research established that R. nitidula is nutritious with 36-40% protein, 41-43% fat, 2.5-3.2% carbohydrate, 2.6-3.9% ash, 11.0-14.5% dietary fiber, and 900-2300 μg/100 g total carotenoids on a dry matter basis. Sautéing was the most preferred processing method resulting in grasshoppers with a notably better aroma and flavor. After 12 weeks of storage at room temperature, processed and vacuum packed, ready-to-eat grasshoppers maintained their edible quality with an acid value of 3.2 mg KOH/g, a total plate count of log 1.8 cfu/g, and an overall acceptability of 6.7-7.2 on a 9-point hedonic scale. Further research is required for extending the shelf stability beyond 12 weeks and characterizing the profile of major nutrients.Entities:
Keywords: Acceptability; Ruspolia nitidula; edible insects; nutritional value; processing; shelf stability
Year: 2016 PMID: 28070321 PMCID: PMC5217929 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Effect of preparation methods on the consumer acceptability of Ruspolia nitidula
| Sample | Ingredients | Mean overall acceptability | Most frequent comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sautéed and dried | |||
| A | Salt | 5.667 | Was dry |
| B | Salt, onion |
| The best, well spiced |
| C | Salt, onion, curry powder | 6.121 | Tastes good, dry, fatty |
| D | Salt, onion, curry powder, tomatoes | 6.272 | Well flavored |
| E | Salt, onion, curry powder, tomatoes, garlic |
| Sweet/good smell Bad garlic smell |
| Deep fried | |||
| F | Salt, onion | 5.272 | Too oily |
| G | Salt |
| Very dry and no flavor |
| Boiled and dried | |||
| H | Salt | 6.709 | So dry, but tasty |
| I | Salt, onion | 7.000 | Soft, tasty |
| J | Salt, onion, tomato |
| Best of all, well prepared |
NB: 30‐panellist members were used.
Proximate, mineral, and total carotenoid contents of the green and brown Ruspolia nitidula subtypes for two swarming seasons
| Subtype and Origin | Moisture | Nutritional components (% dry matter) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude protein | Crude fat | Carobhydrate | Dietary fiber | Ash | Phosphorus (mg/kg) | Potassium (mg/kg) | Carotenoids ( | ||
| KGN | 53.41 ± 0.9b | 39.12 ± 1.5a | 41.17 ± 0.7a | 2.64 ± 0.8a | 13.06 ± 0.8a | 3.96 ± 0.4b | 4.96 ± 0.3a | 4.94 ± 0.4a | 1267.1 ± 0.6a |
| KGA | 47.63 ± 0.3a | 40.08 ± 0.5a | 42.37 ± 1.6a | 3.02 ± 0.5a | 11.89 ± 0.8b | 2.67 ± 0.4a | 4.96 ± 0.3a | 5.08 ± 0.3a | 2164.9 ± 3.1b |
| MGN | 52.97 ± 1.0b | 37.92 ± 1.4a | 41.81 ± 2.2a | 2.50 ± 0.4a | 14.34 ± 0.5a | 3.41 ± 0.7a | 4.75 ± 0.2a | 5.25 ± 0.1a | 1389.4 ± 2.2a |
| MGA | 47.56 ± 0.7a | 40.30 ± 1.2a | 42.23 ± 0.7a | 3.21 ± 1.0a | 11.32 ± 0.8b | 2.60 ± 0.1a | 4.75 ± 0.2a | 4.80 ± 0.2a | 2156.8 ± 2.5b |
| KBN | 55.39 ± 2.4b | 38.49 ± 0.7a | 41.41 ± 1.0a | 2.96 ± 1.6a | 13.85 ± 1.3a | 3.27 ± 0.5a | 4.66 ± 0.4a | 5.04 ± 0.3a | 1224.5 ± 0.8a |
| KBA | 51.60 ± 0.7c | 39.73 ± 0.8a | 42.38 ± 1.7a | 2.96 ± 0.8a | 12.19 ± 0.5b | 2.74 ± 0.1a | 4.85 ± 0.5a | 5.55 ± 0.6a | 2084.8 ± 2.8b |
| MBN | 54.55 ± 2.7b | 36.99 ± 0.9a | 43.04 ± 1.5a | 2.92 ± 1.6a | 13.14 ± 0.9a | 3.75 ± 0.1a | 4.22 ± 0.4a | 4.57 ± 0.5a | 913.7 ± 0.1c |
| MBA | 50.93 ± 0.9c | 40.38 ± 2.6a | 41.94 ± 2.0a | 3.06 ± 0.4a | 11.34 ± 0.7b | 3.05 ± 0.5a | 4.37 ± 0.3a | 4.88 ± 0.6a | 2273.1 ± 1.4b |
Figures having the same superscripts in a column are not significantly different (P ≥ 0.05, three replicates).
M, Masaka; K, Kampala; G, green; B, brown; A, March–May season; N, November–December season.
Changes in mean attribute scores of sautéed and dried Ruspolia nitidula flavored with salt and onions over 12 weeks of storage
| Attribute | Biweekly mean attribute score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | |
| Aroma | 6.9 ± 2.34a | 6.8 ± 1.21a | 6.9 ± 1.25a | 7.3 ± 1.17a | 6.6 ± 1.52a | 7.3 ± 0.99a | 6.6 ± 1.52a |
| Taste | 7.6 ± 1.4a | 7.1 ± 1.36a | 7.2 ± 1.37a | 7.6 ± 1.13a | 7.3 ± 1.02a | 7.9 ± 0.86a | 7.3 ± 1.02a |
| Flavor | 7.7 ± 1.92a | 7.0 ± 1.18a | 7.0 ± 1.18a | 7.4 ± 1.28a | 6.9 ± 1.14a | 7.0 ± 1.44a | 6.9 ± 1.14a |
| Texture | 7.0 ± 2.13a | 6.5 ± 1.72a | 6.5 ± 1.50a | 6.7 ± 1.81a | 6.6 ± 1.61a | 7.0 ± 1.21a | 6.6 ± 1.61a |
| Appearance | 6.8 ± 2.41a | 6.2 ± 1.89a | 6.6 ± 1.74a | 6.8 ± 1.72a | 6.9 ± 1.35a | 7.3 ± 1.84a | 6.9 ± 1.34a |
| Color | 7.1 ± 1.16a | 7.4 ± 1.22a | 7.0 ± 1.07a | 7.1 ± 0.77a | 6.9 ± 1.31a | 7.7 ± 1.23a | 6.9 ± 1.30a |
| Overall acceptability | 7.2 ± 1.18a | 6.8 ± 1.33a | 6.9 ± 1.46a | 7.2 ± 1.39a | 6.9 ± 1.28a | 7.3 ± 1.18a | 6.9 ± 1.40a |
Results are mean ± standard deviations of 30 panelists per sitting for a period of 12 weeks.
Figures having the same superscripts are not significantly different (P ≥ 0.05, three replicates).
Changes in mean attribute scores of boiled and dried Ruspolia nitidula flavored with salt and onions over 12 weeks of storage
| Attribute | Biweekly mean attribute score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 12 | |
| Aroma | 5.8 ± 1.32a | 5.0 ± 2.52b | 5.1 ± 1.98b | 5.0 ± 1.47b | 5.3 ± 1.56b | 5.7 ± 1.44a | 5.3 ± 1.78b |
| Taste | 6.6 ± 1.68a | 5.2 ± 1.92b | 6.0 ± 1.82b | 5.2 ± 1.61b | 5.0 ± 2.12b | 5.7 ± 1.55b | 5.5 ± 1.81b |
| Flavor | 6.5 ± 1.51a | 5.4 ± 1.69b | 5.1 ± 1.79b | 5.0 ± 1.83b | 5.7 ± 1.69b | 5.6 ± 1.30b | 5.0 ± 2.22b |
| Texture | 6.2 ± 1.43a | 5.5 ± 2.33b | 5.9 ± 2.04b | 5.7 ± 1.58b | 5.7 ± 1.78b | 5.9 ± 2.08a | 5.2 ± 1.95b |
| Appearance | 6.8 ± 1.52a | 4.7 ± 1.95b | 6.0 ± 1.85b | 5.2 ± 1.79b | 5.1 ± 1.99b | 5.5 ± 1.87b | 5.1 ± 2.10b |
| Color | 6.4 ± 1.99a | 5.4 ± 1.96b | 5.4 ± 1.92b | 5.7 ± 1.76b | 5.3 ± 1.89b | 5.8 ± 1.69b | 5.2 ± 1.93b |
| Overall acceptability | 6.4 ± 1.59a | 5.2 ± 1.71b | 5.6 ± 1.62b | 5.3 ± 1.58b | 5.4 ± 1.86b | 5.7 ± 1.43b | 5.1 ± 1.91b |
Results are mean ± standard deviations of 30 panelists per sitting for a period of 12 weeks.
Figures having the same superscripts are not significantly different (P ≥ 0.05, three replicates).
Figure 1Changes in the total plate count of Ruspolia nitidula during 12 weeks of storage at ambient temperature.
Figure 2Changes in the acid value of Ruspolia nitidula during 12 weeks of storage at ambient temperature.
Figure 3Frequency of descriptive comments given by panelists on each attribute during shelf‐life testing of Ruspolia nitidula.