| Literature DB >> 28070055 |
Ji-Su Kim1,2, Seung-Bin Yoon1,2,3, Kang-Jin Jeong1, Bo-Woong Sim1,3, Seon-A Choi1,3, Sang-Il Lee1, Yeung Bae Jin1, Bong-Seok Song1,3, Sang-Rae Lee1,2, Sun-Uk Kim1,2,3, Kyu-Tae Chang1,2,3.
Abstract
The current study was performed to investigate the effect of oocyte donor status, including age and body weight, on metaphase II (MII) oocyte recovery using two superovulation methods in cynomolgus monkeys. The use of Method A [recombinant gonadotrophin (75 IU/kg, 3 ×, 3-day intervals) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)] led to great increases in ovary size and the mean number of MII oocytes retrieved in age- and body-weight-dependent manner; in contrast, both the parameters were similar in Method B [recombinant gonadotrophin (60 IU, twice daily, 6 days), recombinant gonadotropin and recombinant human luteinizing hormone (rhLH) (60 IU, twice daily, 3 days), and hCG]. Importantly, Method A showed maximal MII oocyte recovery rate in > 60-month-old or 4.5-5.0-kg female monkeys, whereas Method B was equally effective regardless of the donor age and body weight. These results indicate that superovulatory responses depend on the interaction between oocyte donor status and the superovulation method used in cynomolgus monkeys.Entities:
Keywords: Age; Body weight; Cynomolgus monkey; MII oocyte; Superovulation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28070055 PMCID: PMC5401808 DOI: 10.1262/jrd.2016-074
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Dev ISSN: 0916-8818 Impact factor: 2.214
Fig. 1.Schematic illustration of two superovulation methods used in this study.
Fig. 2.Changes in ovary size in females of different ages (A and C) and body weights (B and D) after superovulation stimulation by Method A. Scale bar, 5 mm (A and B). Values are presented as the means ± standard deviation (S.D.; * P < 0.05). M, month.
Fig. 3.Bright- (A) and fluorescence-field (B) images of oocytes recovered from ovaries stimulated by Method A. Scale bar, 25 μm (A and B). The number (C and E) and proportion (D and F) of oocytes retrieved from females of different ages (C and D) and body weights (E and F). Values represent the means ± S.D. (* P < 0.05). BF, bright-field; GV, germinal vesicle; MII, metaphase II.
Fig. 4.Changes in ovary size in females of different ages (A and C) and body weights (B and D) after superovulation stimulation by Method B. Scale bar, 5 mm (A and B). Values are presented as the means ± S.D.
Fig. 5.The number (A and C) and proportion (b and d) of oocytes retrieved from females of different ages (A and B) and body weights (C and D) after stimulation with Method B. Values represent the means ± S.D. (* P < 0.05).