Literature DB >> 28069905

Evaluation of the threshold value for the modified early warning score (MEWS) in medical septic patients: a secondary analysis of an Italian multicentric prospective cohort (SNOOPII study).

D Tirotta1, M Gambacorta2, M La Regina3, T Attardo4, A Lo Gullo3,5, F Panzone6, A Mazzone7, M Campanini8, F Dentali9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to aging and resources limitation, septic patients are often admitted to medical wards (MWs). Early warning deterioration is a relevant issue in this setting. Unfortunately, a suitable prognostic score has not been identified, yet. AIM: To explore the ability of Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) to predict the in-hospital mortality in septic patients admitted to MWs.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicentric prospective study.
METHODS: Consecutive septic patients with positive blood culture admitted to 31 Italian MWs were included. Baseline characteristics, clinics, isolates, rate of transfer to ICU, MEWS was collected on admission according to the study protocol. The accuracy of MEWS in predicting the in-hospital mortality was assessed with the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV), likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated for different MEWS cut-offs and age/comorbidities subgroups.
RESULTS: In total 526 patients were included in this analysis. Median MEWS was (range 0-11). In-hospital mortality was 14.8% and transfer to ICU 1.3%. Mortality progressively increased according to MEWS (3% in MEWS 0 vs. 27% in MEWS >5; Chi square for trend P < 0.05). The AUC of MEWS in predicting in-hospital mortality was 0.596 (95% CI, 0.524, 0.669). MEWS did not appear to have an adequate sensitivity, sensibility, PPV, NPV and LR both in the whole population and in the pre-specified subgroups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not seem to support the use of MEWS to predict the in-hospital mortality risk of sepsis in MWs.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Physicians. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28069905     DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcw229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QJM        ISSN: 1460-2393


  10 in total

1.  Technical considerations for evaluating clinical prediction indices: a case study for predicting code blue events with MEWS.

Authors:  Kais Gadhoumi; Alex Beltran; Christopher G Scully; Ran Xiao; David O Nahmias; Xiao Hu
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.688

2.  Early warning score validation methodologies and performance metrics: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Hao Sen Fang; Wan Tin Lim; Tharmmambal Balakrishnan
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Early warning scores for detecting deterioration in adult hospital patients: systematic review and critical appraisal of methodology.

Authors:  Stephen Gerry; Timothy Bonnici; Jacqueline Birks; Shona Kirtley; Pradeep S Virdee; Peter J Watkinson; Gary S Collins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-05-20

4.  Prognostic value of Modified Early Warning Score generated in a Chinese emergency department: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xiaohua Xie; Wenlong Huang; Qiongling Liu; Wei Tan; Lu Pan; Lei Wang; Jian Zhang; Yunyun Wang; Yingchun Zeng
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Lactate-enhanced-qSOFA (LqSOFA) score is superior to the other four rapid scoring tools in predicting in-hospital mortality rate of the sepsis patients.

Authors:  Sijia Liu; Chengqi He; Weilue He; Tian Jiang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-08

6.  Establishment of a novel risk score for in-hospital mortality in adult sepsis patients.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Zheng; Xiao-Juan Zhu; Yu-Wei Chen; Yu-Zhen Zheng; Yi Zhou; Wen-Jie Chen; Xiang-Tao Zheng; Ming Zhong; Zhi-Tao Yang; En-Qiang Mao; Er-Zhen Chen; Ying Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-07

7.  A prediction model for 30-day mortality of sepsis patients based on intravenous fluids and electrolytes.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Songqiao Feng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  A Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Use of the Modified Early Warning Score to Improve Outcome Prediction in Neurosurgical Patients.

Authors:  Michael Karsy; Joshua C Hunsaker; Forrest Hamrick; Matthew N Sanford; Amanda Breviu; William T Couldwell; Devin Horton
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-29

Review 9.  Developing a framework for evidence-based grading and assessment of predictive tools for clinical decision support.

Authors:  Mohamed Khalifa; Farah Magrabi; Blanca Gallego
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Use of the Modified Early Warning Score in intrahospital transfer of patients.

Authors:  Luciele da Rocha Monzon; Márcio Manozzo Boniatti
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.