Literature DB >> 28069307

Finding clean water habitats in urban landscapes: professional researcher vs citizen science approaches.

Elaine McGoff1, Francesca Dunn1, Luis Moliner Cachazo1, Penny Williams2, Jeremy Biggs1, Pascale Nicolet1, Naomi C Ewald1.   

Abstract

This study investigated patterns of nutrient pollution in waterbody types across Greater London. Nitrate and phosphate data were collected by both citizen scientists and professional ecologists and their results were compared. The professional survey comprised 495 randomly selected pond, lake, river, stream and ditch sites. Citizen science survey sites were self-selected and comprised 76 ponds, lakes, rivers and streams. At each site, nutrient concentrations were assessed using field chemistry kits to measure nitrate-N and phosphate-P. The professional and the citizen science datasets both showed that standing waterbodies had significantly lower average nutrient concentrations than running waters. In the professional datasets 46% of ponds and lakes had nutrient levels below the threshold at which biological impairment is likely, whereas only 3% of running waters were unimpaired by nutrients. The citizen science dataset showed the same broad pattern, but there was a trend towards selection of higher quality waterbodies with 77% standing waters and 14% of rivers and streams unimpaired. Waterbody nutrient levels in the professional dataset were broadly correlated with landuse intensity. Rivers and streams had a significantly higher proportion of urban and suburban land cover than other waterbody types. Ponds had higher percentage of semi-natural vegetation within their much smaller catchments. Relationships with land cover and water quality were less apparent in the citizen-collected dataset probably because the areas visited by citizens were less representative of the landscape as whole. The results suggest that standing waterbodies, especially ponds, may represent an important clean water resource within urban areas. Small waterbodies, including ponds, small lakes<50ha and ditches, are rarely part of the statutory water quality monitoring programmes and are frequently overlooked. Citizen scientist data have the potential to partly fill this gap if they are co-ordinated to reduce bias in the type and location of the waterbodies selected.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ditch; Lake; Nutrients; Pond; River; Stream

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28069307     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

Review 1.  Applying citizen science to monitor for the Sustainable Development Goal Indicator 6.3.2: a review.

Authors:  Lauren Quinlivan; Deborah V Chapman; Timothy Sullivan
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Community monitoring of coliform pollution in Lake Tanganyika.

Authors:  Happiness Anold Moshi; Daniel Abel Shilla; Ismael Aaron Kimirei; Catherine O' Reilly; Wim Clymans; Isabel Bishop; Steven Arthur Loiselle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Monitoring biological water quality by volunteers complements professional assessments.

Authors:  Edwin T H M Peeters; Anton A M Gerritsen; Laura M S Seelen; Matthijs Begheyn; Froukje Rienks; Sven Teurlincx
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Opportunities, approaches and challenges to the engagement of citizens in filling small water body data gaps.

Authors:  M Kelly-Quinn; J N Biggs; S Brooks; P Fortuño; S Hegarty; J I Jones; F Regan
Journal:  Hydrobiologia       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.822

5.  Getting the full picture: Assessing the complementarity of citizen science and agency monitoring data.

Authors:  Jeneen Hadj-Hammou; Steven Loiselle; Daniel Ophof; Ian Thornhill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.