Literature DB >> 28068551

Investigating task inhibition in children versus adults: A diffusion model analysis.

Stefanie Schuch1, Kerstin Konrad2.   

Abstract

One can take n-2 task repetition costs as a measure of inhibition on the level of task sets. When switching back to a Task A after only one intermediate trial (ABA task sequence), Task A is thought to still be inhibited, leading to performance costs relative to task sequences where switching back to Task A is preceded by at least two intermediary trials (CBA). The current study investigated differences in inhibitory ability between children and adults by comparing n-2 task repetition costs in children (9-11years of age, N=32) and young adults (21-30years of age, N=32). The mean reaction times and error rate differences between ABA and CBA sequences did not differ between the two age groups. However, diffusion model analysis revealed that different cognitive processes contribute to the inhibition effect in the two age groups: The adults, but not the children, showed a smaller drift rate in ABA than in CBA, suggesting that persisting task inhibition is associated with slower response selection in adults. In children, non-decision time was longer in ABA than in CBA, possibly reflecting longer task preparation in ABA than in CBA. In addition, Ex-Gaussian functions were fitted to the distributions of correct reaction times. In adults, the ABA-CBA difference was reflected in the exponential parameter of the distribution; in children, the ABA-CBA difference was found in the Gaussian mu parameter. Hence, Ex-Gaussian analysis, although noisier, was generally in line with diffusion model analysis. Taken together, the data suggest that the task inhibition effect found in mean performance is mediated by different cognitive processes in children versus adults.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Cognitive development; Diffusion model analysis; N−2 Task repetition costs; Response time distributional analysis; Task inhibition

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28068551     DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  6 in total

1.  Increased cognitive control after task conflict? Investigating the N-3 effect in task switching.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; James A Grange
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-25

2.  A spurious correlation between difference scores in evidence-accumulation model parameters.

Authors:  James A Grange; Stefanie Schuch
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-09-22

3.  Task intentions and their implementation into actions: cognitive control from adolescence to middle adulthood.

Authors:  Edita Poljac; Rianne Haartsen; Renske van der Cruijsen; Andrea Kiesel; Ervin Poljac
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-10-13

Review 4.  Computational neuroscience across the lifespan: Promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  Wouter van den Bos; Rasmus Bruckner; Matthew R Nassar; Rui Mata; Ben Eppinger
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.464

5.  The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching: a diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Agnieszka W Kowalczyk; James A Grange
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-06-08

6.  On the reliability of behavioral measures of cognitive control: retest reliability of task-inhibition effect, task-preparation effect, Stroop-like interference, and conflict adaptation effect.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; Andrea M Philipp; Luisa Maulitz; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-12-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.