| Literature DB >> 28067859 |
Jin-Chern Chiou1,2, Shun-Hsi Hsu3, Yu-Chieh Huang4, Guan-Ting Yeh5, Wei-Ting Liou6, Cheng-Kai Kuei7.
Abstract
This study presented a wireless smart contact lens system that was composed of a reconfigurable capacitive sensor interface circuitry and wirelessly powered radio-frequency identification (RFID) addressable system for sensor control and data communication. In order to improve compliance and reduce user discomfort, a capacitive sensor was embedded on a soft contact lens of 200 μm thickness using commercially available bio-compatible lens material and a standard manufacturing process. The results indicated that the reconfigurable sensor interface achieved sensitivity and baseline tuning up to 120 pF while consuming only 110 μW power. The range and sensitivity tuning of the readout circuitry ensured a reliable operation with respect to sensor fabrication variations and independent calibration of the sensor baseline for individuals. The on-chip voltage scaling allowed the further extension of the detection range and prevented the implementation of large on-chip elements. The on-lens system enabled the detection of capacitive variation caused by pressure changes in the range of 2.25 to 30 mmHg and hydration level variation from a distance of 1 cm using incident power from an RFID reader at 26.5 dBm.Entities:
Keywords: UHF RFID Class1 Gen2; capacitance-to-digital converter (CDC); capacitive sensor; soft contact lens
Year: 2017 PMID: 28067859 PMCID: PMC5298681 DOI: 10.3390/s17010108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Proposed smart contact lens (SCL) system architecture; (b) Block diagram of the proposed smart contact lens.
Figure 2(a) Prototypes of transmitting (left) and receiving antennas (right); (b) Simulated |S11| of transmitting antenna (left) and receiving antenna (right).
Figure 3(a) Configuration of the simulation; (b) Eye model for specific absorption rate (SAR) simulation.
Figure 4Principle and fabrication process of the capacitive pressure sensor.
Figure 5(a) System model of the capacitance-to-digital converter (CDC); (b) Charge conversion curve of the CDC.
Figure 6(a) A schematic of the proposed reconfigurable CDC; (b) Conversion curve and tuning behaviors of CDC.
Figure 7(a) Contact lens assembly process; (b) Assembled wrinkle free soft contact lens.
Figure 8Die photo of the proposed sensor chip.
Figure 9(a) Baseline tuning of the CDC; (b) Sensitivity tuning of the CDC; (c) CDC conversion curves; (d) The ENOB of the CDC.
A comparison of the performance of the capacitance-to-digital converter used in the present study to those used in previous studies.
| [ | [ | [ | [ | This Work | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Δ-Σ | Dual-Slope | PWM | Δ-Σ | Δ-Σ |
| Input Range | 0.54–1.06 pF | 5.3–30.7 pF | 1–6.8 pF | 8.4–11.6 pF | 1.5–120 pF |
| Chip Area | 0.28 mm2 | N/A | 0.51 mm2 | 2.6 mm2 | 0.41 mm2 |
| Power | 10.3 μW | 110 nW | 210 μW | 14.9 mW | 100 μW |
| ENOB | 12.5 bits | 7.05 bits | 15 bits | 15.3 bits | 9.7 bits |
Figure 10The experimental setup.
Figure 11(a) Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement results; (b) Hydration level measurement results.
A comparison of the intraocular pressure monitoring system in the present study with those used in previous studies.
| References | [ | [ | [ | This Work |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Implantable | Implantable | Wearable | Wearable |
| Communication Technique | Active | Load Modulation | N/A | Load Modulation |
| Frequency | 2.5 GHz | 13.56 MHz | 27 MHz | 920 MHz |
| Power Consumption | 1.4 mW | 1.2 mW | N/A | 110 μW |
| Communication Distance | N/A | 4 cm | N/A | 1 cm |
| Sensor Type | Capacitive | Resistive | Resistive | Capacitive |
| Sensor Range | 5.3 pF–5.75 pF | 5 KΩ–50 KΩ | N/A | 1.5 pF–120 pF |
| ENOB | N/A | 8 | N/A | 9.7 |
| Chip Size | 0.5 mm2 | 2 mm2 | N/A | 1.58 mm2 |
| Communication Protocol | N.A | ISO-15693 | N/A | EPC Class1 Gen2 |
| Lens Thickness | N/A | N/A | 400 μm | 200 μm |
| Lens Material | N/A | N/A | Silicone | HEMA |