Literature DB >> 28067610

The Efficacy of a Computer-Assisted Cognitive Rehabilitation Program for Patients with Mild Cognitive Deficits: A Pilot Study.

William E Mansbach1, Ryan A Mace1, Kristen M Clark1.   

Abstract

Background/Study
Context: Whereas computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation (CR) programs show promise as tools for improving cognition in certain populations, there is not a consensus regarding their efficacy. This study focuses on restorative CR, a treatment designed to improve cognitive functioning affected by progressive brain changes due to disease or aging, through computer-assisted cognitive exercises. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a computer-assisted restorative CR intervention for improving cognitive functioning in older rehabilitation patients with relatively mild cognitive deficits.
METHODS: Older adult residents in a Maryland retirement community (N = 43) who met inclusion criteria were assigned to either the CR treatment or the control group. Treatment group participants completed 3 weeks (nine sessions) of Memory Match, an online CR module designed to improve attention and visual memory, whereas the control group did not complete the CR program after the baseline assessment. Analyses were based on the 38 (n = 20 treatment, n = 18 control) participants (mean age = 78.08 ± 10.31) who completed the post-assessment Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool (BCAT) and a self-rating inventory (SRI) of cognitive ability.
RESULTS: Treatment group participants who received the CR treatment obtained significantly higher BCAT scores (medium to large effect size) at post-assessment than control group participants over the same period. Additional evidence for the efficacy of the CR program was found by comparing responses on a SRI of cognitive ability between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The authors discuss the merits and shortcoming of this pilot study, the utility of the CR program for older rehabilitation patients with relatively mild cognitive deficits, and ideas for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28067610     DOI: 10.1080/0361073X.2017.1258256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Conceptual View of Cognitive Intervention in Older Adults With and Without Cognitive Decline-A Systemic Review.

Authors:  Liliana Mendes; Joana Oliveira; Fernando Barbosa; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Front Aging       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 2.  Effects of computerised cognitive training on cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mingyue Hu; Xinyin Wu; Xinhui Shu; Hengyu Hu; Qiong Chen; Linlin Peng; Hui Feng
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Technology-based cognitive training and rehabilitation interventions for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shaoqing Ge; Zheng Zhu; Bei Wu; Eleanor S McConnell
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Training Cognitive Functions Using Mobile Apps in Breast Cancer Patients: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Laura Vergani; Giulia Marton; Silvia Francesca Maria Pizzoli; Dario Monzani; Ketti Mazzocco; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Healthcare Professionals' Acceptance of Digital Cognitive Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Ineke J M van der Ham; Rosalie van der Vaart; Anouk Miedema; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Milan N A van der Kuil
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-26

Review 6.  Categorizing Health Outcomes and Efficacy of mHealth Apps for Persons With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel R Bateman; Bhavana Srinivas; Thomas W Emmett; Titus K Schleyer; Richard J Holden; Hugh C Hendrie; Christopher M Callahan
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.