BACKGROUND AND AIM: The significance of examination time of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for asymptomatic examinees is yet to be established. We aimed to clarify whether endoscopists who allot more examination time can detect higher numbers of neoplastic lesions among asymptomatic examinees. METHODS: We reviewed a database of consecutive examinees who underwent EGD in our hospital from April 2010 to September 2015. Staff endoscopists were classified into fast, moderate, and slow groups based on the mean examination time of EGD without a biopsy. Neoplastic lesion detection rate among these groups was compared using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 55 786 consecutive examinees who underwent EGD, 15 763 asymptomatic examinees who were screened by staff doctors were analyzed. Mean examination time of 13 661 EGD without biopsy was 6.2 min (range, 2-18 min). When cut-off times of 5 and 7 min were used, four endoscopists were classified into the fast (mean duration, 4.4 ± 1.0 min), 12 into the moderate (6.1 ± 1.4 min), and four into the slow (7.8 ± 1.9 min) groups. Neoplastic lesion detection rates in the fast, moderate, and slow groups were 0.57% (13/2288), 0.97% (99/10 180), and 0.94% (31/3295), respectively. Compared with that in the fast group, odds ratios for the neoplastic lesion detection rate in the moderate and slow groups were 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.40) and 1.89 (95% CI, 0.98-3.64), respectively. CONCLUSION: Endoscopists who do not allot adequate examination time may overlook neoplastic lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The significance of examination time of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for asymptomatic examinees is yet to be established. We aimed to clarify whether endoscopists who allot more examination time can detect higher numbers of neoplastic lesions among asymptomatic examinees. METHODS: We reviewed a database of consecutive examinees who underwent EGD in our hospital from April 2010 to September 2015. Staff endoscopists were classified into fast, moderate, and slow groups based on the mean examination time of EGD without a biopsy. Neoplastic lesion detection rate among these groups was compared using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 55 786 consecutive examinees who underwent EGD, 15 763 asymptomatic examinees who were screened by staff doctors were analyzed. Mean examination time of 13 661 EGD without biopsy was 6.2 min (range, 2-18 min). When cut-off times of 5 and 7 min were used, four endoscopists were classified into the fast (mean duration, 4.4 ± 1.0 min), 12 into the moderate (6.1 ± 1.4 min), and four into the slow (7.8 ± 1.9 min) groups. Neoplastic lesion detection rates in the fast, moderate, and slow groups were 0.57% (13/2288), 0.97% (99/10 180), and 0.94% (31/3295), respectively. Compared with that in the fast group, odds ratios for the neoplastic lesion detection rate in the moderate and slow groups were 1.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.40) and 1.89 (95% CI, 0.98-3.64), respectively. CONCLUSION: Endoscopists who do not allot adequate examination time may overlook neoplastic lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Authors: Marcin Romańczyk; Bartosz Ostrowski; Tomasz Marek; Tomasz Romańczyk; Małgorzata Błaszczyńska; Krzysztof Budzyń; Maciej Bugajski; Mateusz Koziej; Maciej Kajor; Krzysztof Januszewski; Wojciech Zajęcki; Marek Waluga; Marek Hartleb Journal: J Gastroenterol Date: 2021-05-02 Impact factor: 6.772
Authors: Jun Ki Min; Jae Myung Cha; Min Seob Kwak; Jin Young Yoon; Yunho Jung; Jeong Eun Shin; Hyo Joon Yang Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.759
Authors: Duc T Quach; Quy-Dung D Ho; Khien V Vu; Khanh T Vu; Huy V Tran; Nhan Q Le; Nguyen-Phuong N Tran; Thai H Duong; Minh C Dinh; Phuong K Bo; Xung V Nguyen; Quy N Bui; Canh D Tran; Tien T Dao; Huong M Duong Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-04-26 Impact factor: 3.411