BACKGROUND: It has been proven that femoroacetabular impingement cases improve following arthroscopic surgery. However, rehabilitation has a major role in the patient's recovery. The protocol used by our institution consists of an evidence-based guideline for the different phases of rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: Describe and determine the effectiveness of our institution's kinesiotherapy rehabilitation program during 2011-2016, comparing Harris and Vail Hip Scores scales (HHS and VHS, respectively) at the beginning of each treatment phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an observational, descriptive, longitudinal and retrospective study which, from a total of 684 subjects who underwent surgery, and 103 subjects who followed our institution's rehabilitation program, ultimately uses a sample of 48 subjects for analysis; these subjects were included because they completed the scales on the three occasions determined. RESULTS: Significant exact differences were found in: multivariate contrasts HHS (F=147.420; p=0.000); VHS (F=82,160; p=0,000). Mauchly's sphericity test: HHS (W=0.722; p=0.001); VHS (W=0.830; p=0.014). The within-subject effect showed significant exact differences in: HHS (F=169.451; p=0.000); VHS (F=115.387; p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Results showed significant exact differences p=0.00. In spite of its limitations, this study provides a guideline for a patient's safe return to daily life activities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
BACKGROUND: It has been proven that femoroacetabular impingement cases improve following arthroscopic surgery. However, rehabilitation has a major role in the patient's recovery. The protocol used by our institution consists of an evidence-based guideline for the different phases of rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: Describe and determine the effectiveness of our institution's kinesiotherapy rehabilitation program during 2011-2016, comparing Harris and Vail Hip Scores scales (HHS and VHS, respectively) at the beginning of each treatment phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an observational, descriptive, longitudinal and retrospective study which, from a total of 684 subjects who underwent surgery, and 103 subjects who followed our institution's rehabilitation program, ultimately uses a sample of 48 subjects for analysis; these subjects were included because they completed the scales on the three occasions determined. RESULTS: Significant exact differences were found in: multivariate contrasts HHS (F=147.420; p=0.000); VHS (F=82,160; p=0,000). Mauchly's sphericity test: HHS (W=0.722; p=0.001); VHS (W=0.830; p=0.014). The within-subject effect showed significant exact differences in: HHS (F=169.451; p=0.000); VHS (F=115.387; p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Results showed significant exact differences p=0.00. In spite of its limitations, this study provides a guideline for a patient's safe return to daily life activities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Entities:
Keywords:
Harris Hip score; Vail Hip score; hip arthroscopy; kinesiotherapy rehabilitation
Authors: Marc J Philippon; Michael J Decker; J Erik Giphart; Michael R Torry; Michael S Wahoff; Robert F LaPrade Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Johannes Scherr; Bernd Wolfarth; Jeffrey W Christle; Axel Pressler; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Martin Halle Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2012-05-22 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Hari K Ankem; Mitchell J Yelton; Ajay C Lall; Alex M Bendersky; Philip J Rosinsky; David R Maldonado; Jacob Shapira; Mitchell B Meghpara; Benjamin G Domb Journal: J Hip Preserv Surg Date: 2020-12-18