| Literature DB >> 28066542 |
MengMeng Xu1, Odell D Jones2, Liyang Wang3, Xin Zhou3, Harry G Davis4, Joseph L Bryant4, Jianjie Ma5, Willian B Isaacs6, Xuehong Xu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Massive liquid crystal droplets have been found during embryonic development in more than twenty different tissues and organs, including the liver, brain and kidney. Liquid crystal deposits have also been identified in multiple human pathologies, including vascular disease, liver dysfunction, age-related macular degeneration, and other chronic illnesses. Despite the involvement of liquid crystals in such a large number of human processes, this phenomenon is poorly understood and there are no in vitro systems to further examine the function of liquid crystals in biology.Entities:
Keywords: Embryoid body; Embryonic stem cell; Liquid crystal; Phase transition
Year: 2017 PMID: 28066542 PMCID: PMC5210172 DOI: 10.1186/s13578-016-0130-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Biosci ISSN: 2045-3701 Impact factor: 7.133
Fig. 1The birefringent structures in the embryoid bodies derived from H9 and induced iPS DF19-9-7T) at 8-weeks after differentiation. The liquid crystal birefringence distribution in the cortex region (CR) of the EB in (a) and sketched (b) compared to H&E histology (c). The structures of the birefringence are mainly tubular or droplet shaped with the wider-ends oriented towards the center of the EB (d). Arrows in d denote the individual ~35 μm spaced birefringent clusters from which liquid crystal tubules originate on the EB surface. Cross sectional cut exposing the tubular structures (e). The birefringence distributions in two representative cortex areas of an EB (f, g) and their respective quantifications (i, j). Representative image showing the trajectory of a tubule penetrating to the EB core when cut along the longitudinal axis (h). The scale bars are 60 μm in a and c and 300 μm in d–h
Fig. 2Distribution of the longitudinal and cross sections of the EB tubular liquid crystal structures. Quantified measurements of longitudinal and cross sectional diameter lengths (a). Quantified thickness measurements of the shell-like wall (b). All measurements were obtained from birefringence of multiple cross sectional and longitudinal sections (For longitudinal diameters D1 and D2, n = 24; For cross diameters D1 and D2, n = 24; For longitudinal and cross sections, wall-thickness W1 and W2, n = 23). The diameter measurement is obtained from the distance between the outer edges of both sides of the birefringence along the long and short axis. Wall measurements are defined as the average width of the birefringence on each side of the axis (c)
Fig. 3Fluidity characterization of the liquid crystal structures in embryoid bodies derived from H9 and induced iPS DF19-9-7T using the pressure application and release approach. The structures exhibited elongation after pressure application (a). The birefringent complex structures were spread and flattened (c) compared to the structures prior to pressure application (b) in the same view. This change in width was insignificant (d). Time elapse images of the birefringent tubular structure before (e) and after pressure application (f–k) documents the structural distortion and recovery. Higher magnification images of liquid crystal tube recovery and quantifications of width distortion and recovery in several different tubules are shown (l and m, respectively). Statistical significance of tubule width changes in T2–T7 of panel m references time point 1 (T1) of respective color-coded tubules P1–P4. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 in panel m. Scale bars 300 μm in (a); 60 μm in b and c; 120 μm in e–k
Fig. 4Time-lapse recordings of temperature dependent phase transition of embryoid body birefringent liquid crystals. Birefringence of liquid crystals distributed in the embryoid body is lost as the crystals assume isotropic status with temperature increase to 43 °C (a–f). There is incomplete recovery of the birefringent structure as the thermostage resumed room temperature (h, i). This change in birefringence following temperature change and time progression is quantifiable (j). There are no significant differences among birefringence density of T1–T3, but extremely significant difference in T4–T13 based on references T1. Magnifications of the liquid–crystal structures before and after temperature transition highlight the incomplete resumption of the original structure (k, l, respectively). The decrease in size of EB liquid crystal structures is quantified by the significantly smaller diameters Maltese’s cross (D1 before and D1 after, p = 0.000003; D2 before and D2 after, p = 0.000001) and tubular structures (W1 before and W1 after, p = 0.000083; W2 before and W1 after, p = 0.003474) is quantified (M). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 in j. Scale bars are 300 μm in (a–i); 100 μm in (k, l)