Literature DB >> 28065949

Hernioplasty: Tension free mesh repair versus Mayos repair for umbilical hernias.

Nazir Ahmed Tunio1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare two different techniques of repairing umbilical hernia.
METHODS: The comparative study was conducted from April 2009 to December 2011 at the Gambat Institute of Medical Sciences, Gambat, Pakistan, and comprised hernia patients who were randomly allocated to group A and group B. In group A, repair was carried with tension free hernioplasty, while group B underwent Mayo's repair. All patients were operated by the same consultant surgeon. All patients were followed up for 36 months.
RESULTS: The 86 patients were divided into two groups of 43(50%) each. There were 18(20.9%) males and 68(79%) females. Patients in group A needed less post-operative analgesics 4.3±7.49 (p<0.05) and short hospital stay 6.14±1.3 days (p<0.05). Postoperative complications were more in group B (p<0.05). There was 1(2.3%) recurrence in group A and 3(7%) in group B over the 36-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Tension free mesh repair was found to be a better technique than Mayo's repair for umbilical hernia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernioplasty, Mayo's repair, Umbilical hernias.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28065949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc        ISSN: 0030-9982            Impact factor:   0.781


  3 in total

1.  Management of epigastric, umbilical, spigelian and small incisional hernia as a day case procedure: results of long-term follow-up after open preperitoneal flat mesh technique.

Authors:  M Zuvela; D Galun; A Bogdanovic; N Bidzic; M Zivanovic; M Zuvela; M Zuvela
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Mesh versus suture in elective repair of umbilical hernia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  L J Madsen; E Oma; L N Jorgensen; K K Jensen
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-04-06

3.  Efficacy of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Repair for Inguinal Hernia.

Authors:  Zhigang Pan; Minjie Zhang; Ling Wang
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.464

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.