Sherif Ramadan1, Narinder Paul, Hani E Naguib. 1. Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Rosebrugh Building (RS), 164 College Street, Room 407, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Quantifying the mechanical behaviors of soft biological tissues is of considerable research interest. However, validity and reproducibility between different researchers and apparatus is questionable. This study aims to quantify the mechanical properties of myocardium while investigating methodologies that can standardize biological tissue testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tensile testing was performed to obtain Young's modulus and a dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) determined the viscoelastic properties. A frequency range of 0.5 Hz (30bpm) to 3.5 Hz (210bpm) was analyzed. For tensile testing three different preconditioning settings were tested: no load, 0.05 N preload, and a cyclic preload at 2.5% strain and 10 cycles. Samples were placed in saline and tested at 37 °C. Five ovine and five porcine hearts were tested. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Cyclic loading results in the most consistent moduli values. The modulus of ovine/porcine tissue was mean = 0.05/.06 MPa, SD = 0.02/0.03 MPa. The storage/loss modulus varied from = 0.02/0.003 MPa at 0.5 Hz to 0.04/0.008 MPa at 3.5 Hz; Stiffness increases linearly from 400 to 800 N m-1 with a tan delta around 0.175. CONCLUSIONS: Static analysis of the mechanical properties of myocardial tissue confirms that; preconditioning is necessary for reproducibility, and DMA provides a platform for reproducible testing of soft biological tissues.
INTRODUCTION: Quantifying the mechanical behaviors of soft biological tissues is of considerable research interest. However, validity and reproducibility between different researchers and apparatus is questionable. This study aims to quantify the mechanical properties of myocardium while investigating methodologies that can standardize biological tissue testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tensile testing was performed to obtain Young's modulus and a dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) determined the viscoelastic properties. A frequency range of 0.5 Hz (30bpm) to 3.5 Hz (210bpm) was analyzed. For tensile testing three different preconditioning settings were tested: no load, 0.05 N preload, and a cyclic preload at 2.5% strain and 10 cycles. Samples were placed in saline and tested at 37 °C. Five ovine and five porcine hearts were tested. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Cyclic loading results in the most consistent moduli values. The modulus of ovine/porcine tissue was mean = 0.05/.06 MPa, SD = 0.02/0.03 MPa. The storage/loss modulus varied from = 0.02/0.003 MPa at 0.5 Hz to 0.04/0.008 MPa at 3.5 Hz; Stiffness increases linearly from 400 to 800 N m-1 with a tan delta around 0.175. CONCLUSIONS: Static analysis of the mechanical properties of myocardial tissue confirms that; preconditioning is necessary for reproducibility, and DMA provides a platform for reproducible testing of soft biological tissues.
Authors: Clara Park; Yiling Fan; Gregor Hager; Hyunwoo Yuk; Manisha Singh; Allison Rojas; Aamir Hameed; Mossab Saeed; Nikolay V Vasilyev; Terry W J Steele; Xuanhe Zhao; Christopher T Nguyen; Ellen T Roche Journal: Sci Robot Date: 2020-01-29
Authors: Elisabetta Rosellini; Yu Shrike Zhang; Bianca Migliori; Niccoletta Barbani; Luigi Lazzeri; Su Ryon Shin; Mehmet Remzi Dokmeci; Maria Grazia Cascone Journal: J Biomed Mater Res A Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 4.396
Authors: Danielle Pretorius; Asher M Kahn-Krell; Wesley C LaBarge; Xi Lou; Ramaswamy Kannappan; Andrew E Pollard; Vladimir G Fast; Joel L Berry; Alan W Eberhardt; Jianyi Zhang Journal: Biomed Mater Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 3.715
Authors: Eline Huethorst; Peter Mortensen; Radostin D Simitev; Hao Gao; Lotta Pohjolainen; Virpi Talman; Heikki Ruskoaho; Francis L Burton; Nikolaj Gadegaard; Godfrey L Smith Journal: J Physiol Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 6.228
Authors: Ryan A Behmer Hansen; Xinming Wang; Gitanjali Kaw; Valinteshley Pierre; Samuel E Senyo Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 3.246
Authors: Ghazaleh Haghiashtiani; Kaiyan Qiu; Jorge D Zhingre Sanchez; Zachary J Fuenning; Priya Nair; Sarah E Ahlberg; Paul A Iaizzo; Michael C McAlpine Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 14.136